Quorum Sensing Biosensors

  • Navneet Rai
  • Rewa Rai
  • K. V. Venkatesh


Quorum sensing is a cell density-dependent phenomenon, which at high cell density induces expression of target genes in a bacterial population. In bacteria, quorum sensing is facilitated by cell-to-cell signaling molecules referred as autoinducers (AIs). Among Gram-negative bacteria, quorum sensing is mediated primarily by two classes of AIs: AI-1 and AI-2. Further, AI-1 has tens of subtypes and each bacterium responds to a very limited subtypes of AI-1. These signaling molecules, at high cell density, regulate several physiological processes among bacteria, including bioluminescence, biofilm, and virulence.

Numbers of bacteria harboring quorum-sensing system are increasing tremendously. During the last decade, several biosensors have been developed for the detection of AIs. Quorum-sensing biosensors have been proven fast and reliable first-line tools for the screening of bacterial species producing AIs. Some biosensors detect very specific type of AI, and some detect a range of AIs. Biosensors are used for both qualitative and quantitative detection of AIs. In this chapter, we describe different classes of biosensors available for the detection of AI-1 and AI-2. Different qualitative and quantitative methods for the detection of AIs and sensitivity and limitations of biosensors have also been discussed.


Quorum Sense Quorum Sense System Acyl Homoserine Lactone Acyl Side Chain Quorum Sense Molecule 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Anbazhagan D, Mansor M, Yan GO, Md Yusof MY, Hassan H, Sekaran SD (2012) Detection of quorum sensing signal molecules and identification of an autoinducer synthase gene among biofilm forming clinical isolates of Acinetobacter spp. PLoS One 7(7):e36696PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. Chambers CE, Visser MB, Schwab U, Sokol PA (2005) Identification of N-acylhomoserine lactones in mucopurulent respiratory secretions from cystic fibrosis patients. FEMS Microbiol Lett 244(2):297–304PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Chen JW, Koh CL, Sam CK, Yin WF, Chan KG (2013) Short chain N-acyl homoserine lactone production by soil isolate Burkholderia sp. strain A9. Sensors (Basel) 13(10):13217–13227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. de Kievit T, Seed PC, Nezezon J, Passador L, Iglewski BH (1999) RsaL, a novel repressor of virulence gene expression in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Bacteriol 181(7):2175–2184PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  5. Deng X, Zhuang G, Ma A, Yu Q, Zhuang X (2014) Construction of a dual fluorescence whole-cell biosensor to detect N-acyl homoserine lactones. J Environ Sci 26(2):415–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dong YH, Zhang XF, Soo HM, Greenberg EP, Zhang LH (2005) The two-component response regulator PprB modulates quorum-sensing signal production and global gene expression in Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Mol Microbiol 56(5):1287–1301PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Farrand SK, Qin Y, Oger P (2002) Quorum-sensing system of Agrobacterium plasmids: analysis and utility. Methods Enzymol 358:452–484PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Khan SR, Mavrodi DV, Jog GJ, Suga H, Thomashow LS, Farrand SK (2005) Activation of the phz operon of Pseudomonas fluorescens 279 requires the LuxR homolog PhzR, N-(3-OH-Hexanoyl)-L-homoserine lactone produced by the LuxI homolog PhzI, and a cis-acting phz box. J Bacteriol 187(18):6517–6527PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. LaSarre B, Federle MJ (2013) Exploiting quorum sensing to confuse bacterial pathogens. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 77(1):73–111PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Lindsay A, Ahmer BM (2005) Effect of sdiA on biosensors of N-acylhomoserine lactones. J Bacteriol 187(14):5054–5058PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Llamas I, Keshavan N, Gonzalez JE (2004) Use of Sinorhizobium meliloti as an indicator for specific detection of long-chain N-acyl homoserine lactones. Appl Environ Microbiol 70(6):3715–3723PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Massai F, Imperi F, Quattrucci S, Zennaro E, Visca P, Leoni L (2011) A multitask biosensor for micro-volumetric detection of N-3-oxo-dodecanoyl-homoserine lactone quorum sensing signal. Biosens Bioelectron 26(8):3444–3449PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. McClean KH, Winson MK, Fish L, Taylor A, Chhabra SR, Camara M, Daykin M, Lamb JH, Swift S, Bycroft BW, Stewart GS, Williams P (1997) Quorum sensing and Chromobacterium violaceum: exploitation of violacein production and inhibition for the detection of N-acylhomoserine lactones. Microbiology 143(Pt 12):3703–3711PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Pearson JP, Gray KM, Passador L, Tucker KD, Eberhard A, Iglewski BH, Greenberg EP (1994) Structure of the autoinducer required for expression of Pseudomonas aeruginosa virulence genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 91(1):197–201PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  15. Rai N, Anand R, Ramkumar K, Sreenivasan V, Dabholkar S, Venkatesh KV, Thattai M (2012) Prediction by promoter logic in bacterial quorum sensing. PLoS Comput Biol 8(1):e1002361PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Rutherford ST, Bassler BL (2012) Bacterial quorum sensing: its role in virulence and possibilities for its control. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med 2(11)Google Scholar
  17. Savka MA, Le PT, Burr TJ (2011) LasR receptor for detection of long-chain quorum-sensing signals: identification of N-acyl-homoserine lactones encoded by the avsI locus of Agrobacterium vitis. Curr Microbiol 62(1):101–110PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Sokol PA, Sajjan U, Visser MB, Gingues S, Forstner J, Kooi C (2003) The CepIR quorum-sensing system contributes to the virulence of Burkholderia cenocepacia respiratory infections. Microbiology 149(Pt 12):3649–3658PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Steindler L, Venturi V (2007) Detection of quorum-sensing N-acyl homoserine lactone signal molecules by bacterial biosensors. FEMS Microbiol Lett 266(1):1–9PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Swift S, Karlyshev AV, Fish L, Durant EL, Winson MK, Chhabra SR, Williams P, Macintyre S, Stewart GS (1997) Quorum sensing in Aeromonas hydrophila and Aeromonas salmonicida: identification of the LuxRI homologs AhyRI and AsaRI and their cognate N-acylhomoserine lactone signal molecules. J Bacteriol 179(17):5271–5281PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. Taga ME, Xavier KB (2011) Methods for analysis of bacterial autoinducer-2 production. Curr Protoc Microbiol. Chapter 1:Unit 1C.1Google Scholar
  22. Tello E, Castellanos L, Duque C (2013) Synthesis of cembranoid analogues and evaluation of their potential as quorum sensing inhibitors. Bioorg Med Chem 21(1):242–256PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Winson MK, Swift S, Fish L, Throup JP, Jorgensen F, Chhabra SR, Bycroft BW, Williams P, Stewart GS (1998) Construction and analysis of luxCDABE-based plasmid sensors for investigating N-acyl homoserine lactone-mediated quorum sensing. FEMS Microbiol Lett 163(2):185–192PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Zhu J, Beaber JW, More MI, Fuqua C, Eberhard A, Winans SC (1998) Analogs of the autoinducer 3-oxooctanoyl-homoserine lactone strongly inhibit activity of the TraR protein of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. J Bacteriol 180(20):5398–5405PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Zhu J, Chai Y, Zhong Z, Li S, Winans SC (2003) Agrobacterium bioassay strain for ultrasensitive detection of N-acylhomoserine lactone-type quorum-sensing molecules: detection of autoinducers in Mesorhizobium huakuii. Appl Environ Microbiol 69(11):6949–6953PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Genome CenterUniversity of California DavisDavisUSA
  2. 2.Department of ChemistryIndian Institute of Technology DelhiHauz Khas, New DelhiIndia
  3. 3.Department of Chemical EngineeringIndian Institute of Technology BombayPowai, MumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations