Subtropical and Temperate Fruit Crops

  • P. Parvatha Reddy


Symptoms, biomanagement and integrated management of fungal, bacterial and viral diseases, nematode pests, disease complexes and insect pests of subtropical (mango, grape vine, guava and pomegranate) and temperate fruit crops (apple, peach, plum, pear, almond, apricot and strawberry) using PGPR alone or PGPR integrated with physical and cultural methods, botanicals, bioagents and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi are discussed.


Fruit Yield Botrytis Cinerea Grey Mould Meloidogyne Incognita Bacterial Canker 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Berg G, Kunze S, Dahl R (1999) Rhizobacterial isolates for use against phytopathogenic soil fungi and process for applying these rhizobacterial isolates. European Patent no. 98124694Google Scholar
  2. Berg G, Kunze S, Buchner A, Wellington EM, Smalla K (2000) Successful strategy for the selection of new strawberry associated rhizobacteria antagonistic to Verticillium wilt. Can J Microbiol 46:1128–1137PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Berg G, Fritze A, Roskot N, Smalla K (2001) Evaluation of potential biocontrol rhizobacteria from different host plants of Verticillium dahliae. Kleb J Appl Microbiol 91:963–971CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bordiec S, Paquis S, Lacroix H, Dhondt S, Barka EA, Kauffmann S, Jeandet P, Mazeyrat-Gourbeyre F, Cle’ment C, Baillieul F, Dorey S (2011) Comparative analysis of defence responses induced by the endophytic plant growth-promoting rhizobacterium Burkholderia phytofirmans strain PsJN and the non-host bacterium Pseudomonas syringae pv. pisi in grapevine cell suspensions. J Exp Bot 62:595–603PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Burchill RT, Cook RTA (1971) The interaction of urea and microorganisms in suppressing development of perithecia of Venturia inequalis (Cke.) Wint. In: Preace TF, Dickensen CH (eds) Ecology of leaf surface microorganisms. Academic, New York, pp 471–483Google Scholar
  6. De Villiers EE, Korsten L (1994) Biological treatments for the control of mango post-harvest diseases. S Afr Mango Grow Rsquo Assoc Yearb 14:48–51Google Scholar
  7. Guetsky R, Elad Y, Shtienberg D, Dinoor A (2002) Establishment, survival and activity of the biocontrol agents Pichia guilliermondii and Bacillus mycoides applied as a mixture on strawberry plants. Biocont Sci Tech 12:705–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Gupta VK, Sharma K (2004) Integration of chemicals and biocontrol agents for managing white root rot of apple. Acta Hort 635:141–149Google Scholar
  9. Heye CC, Andrews JH (1983) Antagonism of Athelia bombacina and Chaetomium globosum to the apple scab pathogen, Venturia inaequalis. Phytopathology 73:650–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Janisiewicz WJ (1988) Biocontrol of postharvest diseases of apples with antagonist mixtures. Phytopathology 78:194–198CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Janisiewicz WJ, Bors B (1995) Development of a microbial community of bacterial and yeast antagonists to control wound-invading postharvest pathogens of fruits. Appl Environ Microbiol 61:3261–3267PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Janisiewicz WJ, Jeffers SN (1997) Efficacy of commercial formulation of two biofungicides for control of blue mold and gray mold of apple in cold storage. Crop Prot 16:629–633CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Jeffers SN, Wright TS (1994) Comparison of four promising biological control agents for managing postharvest diseases of apples and pears. Phytopathology 84:1082Google Scholar
  14. Jones DA, Kerr A (1989) Agrobacterium radiobacter K1026, a genetically engineered derivative of strain K84, for biological control of crown gall. Plant Dis 73:15–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kabayashi N (1989) Charcoal compost fixed antagonistic microorganisms and its effect to soil-borne diseases (Abstr.). Ann Phytopathol Soc Jpn 55Google Scholar
  16. Kerr A (1980) Biological control of crown gall through production of agrocin 84. Plant Dis 64:25–30Google Scholar
  17. Kishun R (2003) Mango bacterial canker disease and its management strategies. In: Prasad D, Puri SN (eds) Crop pest and disease management: challenges for the millennium. Jyothi Publications, New Delhi, pp 253–259Google Scholar
  18. Koomen I, Jeffries P (1993) Effect of antagonistic microorganisms on the post harvest development of Colletotrichum gloeosporoides on mango. Plant Pathol 42:230–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Korsten L, Lonsdale JH, De Villiers EE, De Jager ES (1992) Pre-harvest control of mango diseases. S Afr Mango Grow Rsquo Assoc Yearb 12:72–78Google Scholar
  20. Leibinger W, Breuker B, Hahn M, Mendgen K (1997) Control of post-harvest pathogens and colonization of the apple surface by antagonistic microorganisms in the field. Phytopathology 87:1103–1110PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lindow SE, McGourty G, Elkins R (1996) Interactions of antibiotics with Pseudomonas fluorescens strain A506 in the control of fire blight and frost injury to pear. Phytopathology 86:841–848CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McInnis T, Klupfel D, Zehr E (1990) Suppression of Criconemella xenoplax on peach by rhizosphere bacteria. In: Proceedings of the 2nd international nematology congress. VeldhovenGoogle Scholar
  23. Montesinos E, Bonaterra A, Ophir A, Beer SV (1996) Antagonism of selected bacterial strains to Stemphylium vesicarium and biological control of brown spot of pear under controlled environmental conditions. Phytopathology 86:856–863CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Moore LW, Warren G (1979) Agrobacterium radiobacter strain 84 and biological control of crown gall caused by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Ann Rev Phytopathol 17:163–179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Garg N, Prakash O, Pathak RK (2003) Biocontrol of anthracnose disease of guava using actinomycete from cow dung. In: Seminar on plant diseases of national importance with special reference to guava wilt and mango malformation. Central Institute of Sub-tropical Horticulture, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India, p 55Google Scholar
  26. Pawar SA, Mhase NL, Kadam DB, Chandlee AG (2013) Management of root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita, Race-II infesting pomegranate by using bioinoculants. Indian J Nematol 43:92–94Google Scholar
  27. Pruvost O, Luisetti J (1991) Acta Hort 291:314–327Google Scholar
  28. Pusey PL, Hotchkiss MW, Dulmage HT, Baumgardner RA, Zehr EI, Reilly CC, Wilson CL (1988) Pilot tests for commercial production and application of Bacillus subtilis (B-3) for postharvest control of peach brown rot. Plant Dis 72:622–626CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Ruangwong OU, Chang CI, Lamine SA, Liang WJ (2012) Identification of antifungal compound produced by Bacillus subtilis LB5 with ability to control anthracnose disease caused by Colletotrichum gloeosporioides. Afr J Microbiol Res 6:3732–3738Google Scholar
  30. Santhi A, Rajeswari S, Sivakumar CV (1998) Soil application of Pseudomonas fluorescens (Migula) for the control of root-knot nematode (Meloidogyne incognita) on grapevine (Vitis vinifera Linn.). In: Mehta UK (ed) Nematology – challenges and opportunities in 21st century. Sugarcane Breeding Institute, Coimbatore, pp 203–206Google Scholar
  31. Senthil Kumar T, Rajendran G (2004) Biocontrol agents for the management of disease complex involving root-knot nematode, Meloidogyne incognita and Fusarium moniliforme on grapevine (Vitis vinifera). Indian J Nematol 34:49–51Google Scholar
  32. Sharma RC, Sharma S, Sharma JN (1999) Present concepts and strategies of disease management in pome and stone fruits. Int J Trop Plant Dis 17:69–80Google Scholar
  33. Slota JE, Farrand SK (1982) Genetic isolation and physical characterization of pAgK84, the plasmid responsible for agrocin 84 production. Plasmid 8:175–186PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Sugar D, Spotts RA (1999) Control of postharvest decay in pear by four laboratory- grown yeasts and two registered biocontrol products. Plant Dis 83:155–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Sundarababu R, Mani MP, Sivakumar CV (1999) A new biocontrol agent for plant parasitic nematodes. Indian Hort 12:25Google Scholar
  36. Tzeng KC, Lin YC, Hsu ST (1994) Place Path Bull 3:24–33Google Scholar
  37. Vanneste JL, Yu J (1996) Biological control of fire blight using Erwinia herbicola Eh252 and Pseudomonas fluorescens A506 separately or in combination. Acta Hort 411:351–353Google Scholar
  38. Vivekananthan R, Ravi M, Ramanathan A, Samiyappan R (2004) Lytic enzymes induced by Pseudomonas fluorescens and other biocontrol organisms mediate defence against the anthracnose pathogen in mango. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 20:235–244CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wilson M, Lindow SE (1993) Interactions between the biological control agent Pseudomonas fluorescens strain A 506 Erwinia amylovora in pear blossoms. Phytopathology 83:117–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Wilson CL, Pusey PL (1985) Potential for biological control of postharvest plant diseases. Plant Dis 69:375–378CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zhang Y, Fan T, Jia W, Zhang W, Liu Q, Li B, Zhang L (2012) Identification and characterization of a Bacillus subtilis strain TS06 as bio-control agent of strawberry replant disease (Fusarium and Verticillium wilts). Afr J Biotechnol 11(3):570–580Google Scholar
  42. Zhou T, Schneider K (1998) Control of peach brown rot by preharvest applications of an isolate of Pseudomonas syringae. In: Abstracts of 7th international congress of plant pathology 3:20Google Scholar
  43. Zhou T, Northover J, Schneider K (1999) Biological control of postharvest diseases of peach with phyllosphere isolates of Pseudomonas syringae. Can J Plant Pathol 21:375–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Zhou T, Northover J, Schneider K, Lu X (2002) Interaction between Pseudomonas syringae MA-4 and cyprodinil in the control of blue mold and gray mold of apple. Can J Plant Pathol 24:154–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Parvatha Reddy
    • 1
  1. 1.Indian Institute of Horticultural ResearchBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations