Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) are found in the rhizosphere of plants and are beneficial for plant development. Presently, PGPR include representatives from very diverse bacterial taxa. The important genera of PGPR belong to pseudomonads, bacilli, diazotrophic PGPR, actinomycetes, enterobacteria and rhizobia. They promote plant growth by increasing the availability of nutrients and increasing the uptake of nitrogen, phosphorus and other minerals, which are known as trace elements in the plant habitat. PGPR help plants directly by secreting phytohormones and some other plant growth-promoting substances and are used as biofertilizers. PGPR also protect plants against pathogens by exploiting their antagonistic potential. They also induce plant-mediated systematic resistance against above-ground microbial pathogens and chewing insects. Preplant bacterization is a plant-protection strategy through delivery of beneficial endophytic bacteria. The use of PGPR as a biocontrol agent has become an effective method of crop protection.


Biocontrol Agent Fusarium Wilt Plant Growth Promotion Rhizoctonia Solani Hydrogen Cyanide 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Alabouvette C, Lemanceau P, Steinberg C (1993) Recent advances in the biological control of fusarium wilts. Pestic Sci 37:365–373CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Antoun H, Beauchamp CJ, Goussard N, Chabot R, Lalande R (1998) Potential of Rhizobium and Bradyrhizobium species as plant growth promoting rhizobacteria on nonlegumes: effect on radishes (Raphanus sativus L.). Plant Soil 204:57–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bakanchikova TI, Lobanok EV, Pavlova-Ivanova LK, Redkina TV, Nagapetyan ZA, Majsuryan AN (1993) Inhibition of tumor formation process in dicotyledonous plants by Azospirillum brasilense strains. Mikrobiologiya 62(Suppl 3):515–523Google Scholar
  4. Bardin SD, Huang HC, Liu L, Yanke LJ (2003) Control of Pythium damping off of canola, safflower, dry pea and sugar beet by microbial seed treatment. Can J Plant Pathol 25:268–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bardin SD, Huang HC, Pinto J, Amundsen EJ, Erickson RS (2004) Biological control of Pythium damping-off of pea and sugar beet by Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. viceae. Can J Bot 82:291–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bashan Y, de-Bashan LE (2002a) Reduction of bacterial speck (Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato) of tomato by combined treatments of plant growth-promoting bacterium, Azospirillum brasilense, streptomycin sulfate, and chemothermal seed treatment. Eur J Plant Pathol 108:821–829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bashan Y, de-Bashan LE (2002b) Protection of tomato seedlings against infection by Pseudomonas syringae pv. tomato by using the plant growth-promoting bacterium Azospirillum brasilense. Appl. Environ. Microbiology 68(Suppl 6):2637–2643Google Scholar
  8. Beattie GA (2006) Plant-associated bacteria: survey, molecular phylogeny, genomics and recent advances. In: Gnanamanickam SS (ed) Plant-associated bacteria. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 1–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bowen GD, Rovira AD (1999) The rhizosphere and its management to improve plant growth. Adv Agron 66:1–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Buonassisi AJ, Copeman RJ, Pepin HS, Eaton GW (1986) Effect of Rhizobium spp. on Fusarium solani f. sp. phaseoli. Can J Phytopathol 8:140–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cao L, Qiu Z, Dai X, Tan H, Lin Y, Zhou S (2004) Isolation of endophytic actinomycetes from roots and leaves of banana (Musa acuminata) plants and their activities against Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 20:501–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chahal PPK, Chahal VPS (1988) Biological control of root-knot nematode on brinjal (Solanum melongena L.) with Azotobacter chroococcum. In: Maqbool MA, Golden AM, Gaffar A, Krusberg LQ (eds) Advances in plant nematology. National Nematological Research Centre, Univ. of Karachi, Karachi, pp 257–263Google Scholar
  13. Chahal VPS, Chahal PPK (2003) Bacillus thuringiensis for the control of Meloidogyne incognita. In: Trivedi PC (ed) Nematode management in plants. Scientific Publishers (India), Jodhpur, pp 251–257Google Scholar
  14. Chakraborty U, Chakraborty B, Basnet M (2006) Plant growth promotion and induction of resistance in Camellia sinensis by Bacillus megaterium. J Basic Microbiol 46(Suppl 3):186–195PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Charest MH, Beauchamp CJ, Antoun H (2005) Effects of the humic substances of de-inking paper sludge on the antagonism between two compost bacteria and Pythium ultimum. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 52:219–227PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cook RJ (2002) Advances in plant health management in the twentieth century. Annu Rev Phytopathol 38:95–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ehteshamul-Haque S, Ghaffar A (1993) Use of rhizobia in the control of root rot diseases of sunflower, okra, soybean and mungbean. J Phytopathol 138:157–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Elliot LF, Lynch JM (1995) The international workshop on establishment of microbial inocula in soils: cooperative research project on biological resource management of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). Am J Altern Agric 10:50–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Franco-Correa M, Quintana A, Duque C et al (2010) Evaluation of actinomycete strains for key traits related with plant growth promotion and mycorrhiza helping activities. Appl Soil Ecol 45:209–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Glick BR (1995) The enhancement of plant growth by free-living bacteria. Can J Microbiol 41:109–117CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Glick BR, Patten CL, Holguin G, Penrose DM (1999) Biochemical and genetic mechanisms used by plant growth-promoting bacteria. Imperial College Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. Gray EJ, Smith DL (2005) Intracellular and extracellular PGPR: commonalities and distinctions in the plant-bacterium signaling processes. Soil Biol Biochem 37:395–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hernández-Castillo FD, Carvajal CR, Guerrero E, Sánchez A, Gallegos G, Lira-Saldivar RH (2005) Susceptibilidad a fungicidas de grupos de anastomosis del hongo Rhizoctonia solani Khün colectados en zonas paperas de Chihuahua. Méx Int J Expt Bot 74:259–269Google Scholar
  24. Hoffland E, Pieterse C, Bik L, van Pelt JA (1995) Induced systemic resistance in radish is not associated with accumulation of pathogenesis-related proteins. Physiol Mol Plant Pathol 46:309–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Holguin G, Bashan Y (1996) Nitrogen-fixation by Azospirillum brasilense Cd is promoted when co-cultured with a mangrove rhizosphere bacterium (Staphylococcus sp). Soil Biol Biochem 28(Suppl 12):1651–1660CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jeyarajan R, Nakkeeran S (2000) Exploitation of microorganisms and viruses as biocontrol agents for crop disease management. In: Upadhyay RK et al (eds) Biocontrol potential and their exploitation in sustainable agriculture. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York, pp 95–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kloepper JW (1993) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria as biological control agents. In: Metting FB Jr (ed) Soil microbial ecology- applications in agricultural and environmental management. Marcel Dekker, New York, pp 255–274Google Scholar
  28. Kloepper JW, Schroth MN (1978) Plant growth-promoting rhizobacteria on radishes. In: Proc. of the 4th Int. Conf. on Plant Pathogenic Bacteria, vol 2, Station de Pathologie Vegetale et Phytobacteriologie, INRA, Angers, pp 879–882Google Scholar
  29. Kloepper JW, Schroth MN (1981) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria and plant growth under gnotobiotic conditions. Phytopathology 71:642–644CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lemanceau P, Alabouvette C (1993) Suppression of Fusarium wilts by fluorescent Pseudomonas: mechanisms and applications. Biocontrol Sci Tech 3:219–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lynch JM, Whipps JM (1991) Substrate flow in the rhizosphere. In: Keister DL, Cregan B (eds) The rhizosphere and plant growth, vol 14, Beltsville symposium. in agricultural research. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 15–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mayak S, Tirosh T, Glick BR (2004) Plant growth-promoting bacteria confer resistance in tomato plants to salt stress. Plant Physiol Biochem 42:565–572PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mazzola M (2002) Mechanisms of natural soil suppressiveness to soil-borne diseases. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 81:557–564PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Merzaeva OV, Shirokikh IG (2006) Colonization of plant rhizosphere by actinomycetes of different genera. Microbiology 75:226–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Oliveira RGB, Drozdowicz A (1987) Inhibition of bacteriocin producing strains of Azospirillum lipoferum by their own bacteriocin. Zentralbl Mikrobiol 142:387–391Google Scholar
  36. Parra G, Ristaino J (2001) Resistance to Mefenoxam and Metalaxyl among field isolates of Phytophthora capsici causing Phytophthora blight of bell pepper. Plant Dis 85:1069–1075CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Paulitz TC, Belanger RB (2001) Biological control in greenhouse systems. Annu Rev Phytopathol 39:103–133PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Raaijmakers JM, Vlami M, de Souza JT (2002) Antibiotic production by bacterial biocontrol agents. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 81:537–547PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Reitz M, Rudolph K, Schröder I, Hoffmann-Hergarten S, Hallmann J, Sikora RA (2000) Lipopolysaccharides of Rhizobium etli strain G12 act in potato roots as an inducing agent of systemic resistance to infection by the cyst nematode Globodera pallida. Appl Environ Microbiol 66:3515–3518PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  40. Ristaino JB (1991) Influence of rainfall, drip irrigation, and inoculum density on the development of Phytophthora root and crown rot epidemics and yield in bell pepper. Phytopathology 81:922–929CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sabaratnam S, Traquair JA (2002) Formulation of a Streptomyces biocontrol agent for the suppression of Rhizoctonia damping-off in tomato transplants. Biol Control 23:245–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Shah S, Karkhanis V, Desai A (1992) Isolation and characterization of siderophore, with antimicrobial activity, from Azospirillum lipoferum M. Curr Microbiol 25(Suppl 6):347–351CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Smith RS (1997) New inoculant technology to meet changing legume management. In: Elmerich C, Kondorosi A, Newton WE (eds) Biological nitrogen fixation for the 21st century. Kluwer, Dordrecht, pp 621–622Google Scholar
  44. Somers E, Ptacek D, Gysegom P, Srinivasan M, Vanderleyden J (2005) Azospirillum brasilense produces the auxin-like phenylacetic acid by using the key enzyme for indole-3-acetic acid biosynthesis. Appl Environ Microbiol 71(Suppl 4):1803–1810PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Sudhakar P, Gangwar SK, Satpathy B, Sahu PK, Ghosh JK, Saratchandra B (2000) Evaluation of some nitrogen fixing bacteria for control of foliar diseases of mulberry (Morus alba). Indian J Seric 39(Suppl 1):9–11Google Scholar
  46. Taechowisan T, Peberdy JF, Lumyong S (2003) Isolation of endophytic actinomycetes from selected plants and their antifungal activity. World J Microbiol Biotechnol 19:381–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Vessey JK (2003) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria as biofertilizers. Plant Soil 255:571–586CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Weller DM (1988) Biological control of soil borne plant pathogens in the rhizosphere with bacteria. Annu Rev Phytopathol 26:379–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Weller DM, Thomashow LS (1993) Use of rhizobacteria for biocontrol. Curr Opin Biotechnol 4:306–311CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Weller DM, Raaijmakers JM, McSpadden Gardener BB, Thomashow LS (2002) Microbial populations responsible for specific soil suppressiveness to plant pathogens. Annu Rev Phytopathol 40:309–348PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Whipps JM (2001) Microbial interactions and biocontrol in the rhizosphere. J Exp Bot 52:487–511PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. Parvatha Reddy
    • 1
  1. 1.Indian Institute of Horticultural ResearchBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations