Skip to main content

In-Group Advantage and Other-Group Bias in Facial Emotion Recognition

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Understanding Facial Expressions in Communication

Abstract

This chapter summarizes the body of work about cultural differences in emotion recognition based on the match versus mismatch of the cultural group expressing the emotion and the cultural group perceiving the emotion. Two major perspectives have arisen to explain the well-replicated empirical finding that there tends to be better recognition of facial expressions where there is a match. The first is the notion of in-group advantage, which is an information-based explanation, arguing that individuals are more accurate judging emotional expressions from their own cultural group versus foreign groups due to better information about culturally specific elements of emotional expression. The finding of systematic in-group advantage has led to the development of a recent dialect theory of emotion, which uses a linguistic metaphor to argue emotion is a universal language with subtly different dialects. Just as it is more challenging to understand someone speaking a different dialect in verbal language, it can be more challenging to recognize emotions that are expressed in a different dialect. This dialect theory has been the subject of controversy due to its implications for dominant theories about cross-cultural differences in emotion. A second perspective is the notion of out-group bias, which is a motivation-based explanation. Individuals may use decoding rules to understand out-group emotional expressions differently, or they may be less motivated to recognize the emotions of other individuals who are members of foreign cultures, even when they are merely lead to believe falsely that expressions originate elsewhere. Both of these theoretical mechanisms can act singly or simultaneously.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaupre, M. G., & Hess, U. (2005). Cross-cultural emotion recognition among Canadian ethnic groups. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36, 355–370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beaupre, M. G., & Hess, U. (2006). An in-group advantage for confidence in emotion recognition judgments: The moderating effect of familiarity with the expressions of outgroup members. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 32, 16–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bühler, K. (1934/1990). Theory of language. The representational function of language. (D. F. Goodwin, Trans.). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dailey, M. N., Joyce, C., Lyons, M. J., Kamachi, M., Ishi, H., Gyoba, J., et al. (2010). Evidence and a computational explanation of cultural differences in facial expression recognition. Emotion, 10, 874–893.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ekman, P. (1972). Universals and cultural differences in facial expressions of emotion. In J. Cole (Ed.), Nebraska symposium on motivation, 1971 (Vol. 19, pp. 207–282). Lincoln: University of Nebraska Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elfenbein, H. A. (2006). Learning in emotion judgments: Training and the cross-cultural understanding of facial expressions. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 30, 21–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elfenbein, H. A., & Ambady, N. (2002a). Is there an in-group advantage in emotion recognition? Psychological Bulletin, 128, 243–249.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elfenbein, H. A., & Ambady, N. (2002b). On the universality and cultural specificity of emotion recognition: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 203–235.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elfenbein, H. A., & Ambady, N. (2003). When familiarity breeds accuracy: Cultural exposure and facial emotion recognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 276–290.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elfenbein, H. A., Beaupré, M. G., Lévesque, M., & Hess, U. (2007). Toward a dialect theory: Cultural differences in the expression and recognition of posed facial expressions. Emotion, 7, 131–146.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Elfenbein, H. A., Mandal, M. K., Ambady, N., Harizuka, S., & Kumar, S. (2004). Hemifacial differences in the in-group advantage in emotion recognition. Cognition and Emotion, 18, 613–629.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elfenbein, H. A., Marsh, A., & Ambady, N. (2002). Emotional Intelligence and the recognition of emotion from the face. In L. F. Barrett & P. Salovey (Eds.), The wisdom of feelings: processes underlying emotional intelligence (pp. 37–59). New York: Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fridlund, A. J. (1991). The sociality of solitary smiles: Effects of an implicit audience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 229–240.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fridlund, A. J. (1994). Human facial expression: an evolutionary view. San Diego, CA, US: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frijda, N. H. (1986). The emotions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, H. M., Mendes, W. B., & Denny-Brown, C. (2008). An in-group advantage in detecting intergroup anxiety. Psychological Science, 19, 1233–1237.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Izard, C. E. (1971). The face of emotion. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kang, S. M., & Lau, A. S. (2013). Revisiting the out-group advantage in emotion recognition in a multicultural society: further evidence for the in-group advantage. Emotion, 13(2), 203–215.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinsmith, A., De Silva, P. R., & Bianchi-Berthouze, N. (2006). Cross-cultural differences in recognizing affect from body posture. Interacting with Computers, 18, 1371–1389.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klineberg, O. (1938). Emotional expression in Chinese literature. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 33, 517–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S. L., Chiu, C. Y., & Chan, T. K. (2005). Some boundary conditions of the expressor culture effect in emotion recognition: Evidence from Hong Kong Chinese perceivers. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 8, 224–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, A. A., Elfenbein, H. A., & Ambady, N. (2003). Nonverbal “accents”: Cultural differences in facial expressions of emotion. Psychological Science, 14, 373–376.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matsumoto, D. (1989). Cultural influences on the perception of emotion. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 20, 92–105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsumoto, D. (2002). Methodological requirements to test a possible in-group advantage in judging emotions across cultures: Comments on Elfenbein and Ambady and evidence. Psychological Bulletin, 128, 236–242.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Matsumoto, D., & Assar, M. (1992). The effects of language on judgments of universal facial expressions of emotion. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 16, 85–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matsumoto, D., & Ekman, P. (1988). Japanese and Caucasian facial expressions of emotion (JACFEE). [Slides]. San Francisco, CA: Intercultural and Emotion Research Laboratory, Department of Psychology, San Francisco State University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsumoto, D., Olide, A., & Willingham, B. (2009). Is there an in-group advantage in recognizing spontaneously expressed emotions?. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 33, 181–191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owren, M. J., & Rendall, D. (2001). Sound on the rebound: Bringing form and function back to the forefront in understanding nonhuman primate vocal signaling. Evolutionary Anthropology, 10, 58–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parkinson, B. (2005). Do facial movements express emotions or communicate motives? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 278–311.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pell, M. D., Monetta, L., Paulmann, S., & Kotz, S. A. (2009). Recognizing emotions in a foreign language. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior, 33, 107–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pinkham, A. E., Sasson, N. J., Calkins, M. E., Richard, J., Hughett, P., Gur, R. E., et al. (2008). The other-race effect in face processing among African American and Caucasian individuals with schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry, 165, 639–645.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Russell, J. A., Bachorowski, J. A., & Fernandez-Dols, J.-M. (2003). Facial and vocal expressions of emotion. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 329–349.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sauter, D. A., Eisner, F., Ekman, P., & Scott, S. K. (2010). Cross-cultural recognition of basic emotions through nonverbal emotional vocalizations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107, 2408–2412.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scherer, K. R. (1988). On the symbolic functions of vocal affect expression. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 7, 79–100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thibault, P., Bourgeois, P., & Hess, U. (2006). The effect of group-identification on emotion recognition: The case of cats and basketball players. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 676–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, W. F., & Balkwill, L. L. (2006). Decoding speech prosody in five languages. Semiotica, 158, 407–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tomkins, S. S., & McCarter, R. (1964). What and where are the primary affects: Some evidence for a theory. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 18, 119–158.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tracy, J. L., & Robins, R. W. (2008). The nonverbal expression of pride: Evidence for cross-cultural recognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94, 516–530.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Kleef, G. A., de Dreu, C. K. W., & Manstead, A. S. R. (2010). An interpersonal approach to emotion in social decision making: The emotions as social information model. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 45–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van der Schalk, J., Hawk, S. T., Fischer, A. H., & Doosje, B. (2011). Moving faces, looking places: Validation of the Amsterdam Dynamic Facial Expression Set (ADFES). Emotion, 11, 907–920.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Wickline, V. B., Bailey, W., & Nowicki, S. (2009). Cultural in-group advantage: Emotion recognition in African American and European American faces and voices. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 1, 5–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, S. G., & Hugenberg, K. (2010). Mere social categorization modulates identification of facial expressions of emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99, 964–977.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

I thank James Russell, longtime collaborators (alphabetically) Abby Marsh, Dana Carney, Manas Mandal, Martin Beaupré, Nalini Ambady, Petri Laukka, and Ursula Hess, and U.S. National Science Foundation grant BCS-0617634.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hillary Anger Elfenbein .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer India

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Elfenbein, H.A. (2015). In-Group Advantage and Other-Group Bias in Facial Emotion Recognition. In: Mandal, M., Awasthi, A. (eds) Understanding Facial Expressions in Communication. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1934-7_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics