Bone Conduction Implant Devices



Bone conduction implants (BCIs) are semi-implantable devices for the treatment of hearing losses in patients who either cannot wear or underperform with conventional hearing aids. These devices have to be surgically implanted, are based on the principle of osseointegration, and work by enhancing natural bone conduction. Since their first introduction in 1977, they have evolved in their external design and functionality. Even the surgical technique has undergone several modifications. Today, they are available as percutaneous and transcutaneous devices.


Hearing Loss Bone Conduction Cortical Bone Thickness Implant Stability Quotient Idiopathic Sudden Sensorineural Hearing Loss 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The author would like to acknowledge Cochlear Ltd., MED-EL GmBH, Oticon Medical, and Sophono Inc. for providing inputs and images.


  1. 1.
    Mudry A, Tjellström A, Kompis M, Caversaccio M-D (eds). Historical background of bone conduction hearing devices and bone conduction hearing aids: implantable bone conduction hearing aids. Adv Otorhinolaryngol. Basel, Karger, vol 71; 2011. pp 1–9 (doi:  10.1159/000323569)
  2. 2.
    Hakansson B, Eeg-Olofsson M, Reinfeldt S, Stenfelt S, Granstrom G. Percutaneous versus transcutaneous bone conduction implant system: a feasibility study on a cadaver head. Otol Neurotol. 2008;29(8):113–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Albrektsson T, Branemark PI, Hansson HA, Lindstrom J. Osseo-integrated titanium implants. Requirements for ensuring a long lasting, direct bone-to-implant anchorage in man. Acta Orthop Scand. 1981;52(2):155–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jahrsdoerfer RA, Yeakley JW, Aguilar EA, Cole RR, Gray LC. Grading system for the selection of patients with congenital aural atresia. Am J Otol. 1992;13(1):6–12.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Shonka Jr DC, Livingston III WJ, Kesser BW. The Jahrsdoerfer grading scale in surgery to repair congenital aural atresia. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008;134(8):873–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Vázquez de la Iglesia F, Cervera-Paz FJ, Manrique Rodríguez M. Surgery for atresia auris: retrospective study of our results and correlation with Jahrsdoerfer prognostic criterium. Acta Otorrinolaringol Esp. 2004;55(7):315–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    De Wolf MJ, et al. Better performance with bone-anchored hearing aid than acoustic devices in patients with severe air-bone gap. Laryngoscope. 2011;121:613–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wazen JJ, Spitzer JB, Ghossaini SN, Fayad JN, Niparko JK, et al. Transcranial contralateral cochlear stimulation in unilateral deafness. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2003;129(3):248–54.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Arndt S, Aschendorff A, Laszig R, Beck R, Schild C, Kroeger S, Ihorst G, Wesarg T. Comparison of pseudobinaural hearing to real binaural hearing rehabilitation after cochlear implantation in patients with unilateral deafness and tinnitus. Otol Neurotol. 2011;32(1):39–47. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181fcf271.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    van de Berg R, Stokroos RJ, Hof JR, Chenault MN. Bone-anchored hearing aid: a comparison of surgical techniques. Otol Neurotol. 2010;31(1):129–35. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e3181c29fec.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mudry A. Bone-anchored hearing aids (BAHA): skin healing process for skin flap technique versus linear incision technique in the first three months after the implantation. Rev Laryngol Otol Rhinol (Bord). 2009;130(4–5):281–4.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Conejeros JMT, Galofre JD, Puchades VM, Rocher FP, Martínez SF, Navas PE. Comparison of skin complications between dermatome and U-graft technique in BAHA surgery. Acta Otorrinolaringol (English Edition). 2009;60(6):422–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Larsson A, Wigren S, Andersson M, Ekeroth G, Flynn M, Nannmark U. Histologic evaluation of soft tissue integration of experimental abutments for bone anchored hearing implants using surgery without soft tissue reduction. Otol Neurotol. 2012;33(8):1445–51. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e318268d4e0.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Wilson DF, Kim HH. A minimally invasive technique for the implantation of bone-anchored hearing devices. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2013;149(3):473–7. doi: 10.1177/0194599813492946. Epub 2013 Jun 5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gawęcki W, Wróbel M, Borucki Ł, Szyfter W. Evaluation of results of using new Baha(®) abutment and new surgical technique without soft tissue reduction. Otolaryngol Pol. 2013;67(6):278–82. doi: 10.1016/j.otpol.2013.10.001. Epub 2013 Oct 3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    House JW, Kutz JW. Bone-anchored hearing aids: incidence and management of postoperative complications. Otol Neurotol. 2007;28(2):213–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Badran K, Arya AK, Bunstone D, Mackinnon N. Long-term complications of bone-anchored hearing aids: a 14-year experience. J Laryngol Otol. 2009;123(2):170–6. doi: 10.1017/S0022215108002521. Epub 2008 May 20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Mesfin FB, Perkins NW, Brook C, et al. Epidural hematoma after tympanomastoidectomy and bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) placement: case report. Neurosurgery. 2010;67(5):E1451–3; discussion E1453.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shirazi MA, Marzo SJ, Leonetti JP. Perioperative complications with the bone-anchored hearing aid. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2006;134(2):236–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Holgers KM, Tjellstrom A, Bjursten LM, Erlandsson BE. Soft tissue reactions around percutaneous implants: a clinical study of soft tissue conditions around skin penetrating titanium implants for bone anchored hearing aids. Am J Otol. 1988;9(1):56–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Faber HT, de Ru. Suboccipital neuropathy after bone conduction device placement. B-ENT. 2013;9(3):247–50.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Stelmachowicz PG, Pittman AL, Hoover BM, Lewis DE. Effect of stimulus bandwidth on the perception of/s/in normal- and hearing-impaired children and adults. J Acoust Soc Am. 2001;110(4):2183–90.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ENTPD Hinduja HospitalMahim, MumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations