Crop Loss Assessment

  • N. G. Ravichandra


Crop losses are influenced by several factors including the pathogenicity of the species of nematode involved, the nematode population density at planting, the susceptibility and tolerance of the host, and a range of environmental factors (Trudgill and Phillips 1997). Because of this, available models only estimate yield losses as proportions of the nematode-free yield. Estimating threshold levels further involves various economic calculations. Consequently, predicting yield losses and calculating economic thresholds for most nematode/crop problems is not yet possible. What is needed is more field-based information on the relationship between nematode population densities and crop performance, and various approaches to obtaining such data are described. Measuring the population density, especially of Meloidogyne species, is a major problem which needs addressing. Better loss estimates are needed for most crops, but good estimates are costly in time and money. Detailed surveys and accurate damage threshold relationships are essential for strengthening expert opinion for generating loss estimates, which is currently the most feasible way to approach this vast and complex topic. Costs of nematode management practices and quarantine and regulatory penalties also should be included more often in generating loss information in the future.


Crop Loss Nematode Population Light Interception Potato Cyst Nematode Initial Population Density 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Dunn, R. A. (1984). How much do plant nematodes cost Floridians? Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Univ. of Florida. Entomology and Nematology News, 10, 7–8.Google Scholar
  2. Oostenbrink, M. (1966). Major characteristics of the relation between nematodes and plants. Meded Landbouwhogeschool Wageningen, 66, 1–46.Google Scholar
  3. Sasser, J. N., & Freckman, D. W. (1987). A world perspective on nematology: The role of the society. In J. A. Veech & D. W. Dickson (Eds.), Vistas on nematology (pp. 7–14; 509 pp). Hyattsville: Society of Nematologists.Google Scholar
  4. Seinhorst, J. W. (1965). The relation between nematode density and damage to plants. Nematologica, 11, 137–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Trudgill, D. L. (1987). Effects of rates of nematicide and of fertiliser on growth and yield of cultivars of potato which differ in their tolerance of damage by potato-cyst nematodes (G. rostochiensis and G. pallida). Plant and Soil, 104, 185–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Trudgill, D. L. (1992). Resistance to and tolerance of plant-parasitic nematodes in plants. Annual Review of Phytopathology, 29, 167–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Trudgill, D. L., & Phillips, M. S. (1997). Nematode population dynamics, threshold levels and estimation of crop losses. In Plant nematode problems and their control in the Near East region (FAO Plant Production and Protection Division, No.144). Karachi (Pakistan).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • N. G. Ravichandra
    • 1
  1. 1.AICRP (Nematodes) Department of Plant PathologyUniversity of Agricultural SciencesBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations