Skip to main content

Common Apprehensions About Nuclear Medicine

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Nuclear Medicine
  • 1831 Accesses

Abstract

Question Will nuclear medicine scans have some side effects? Answer There is always a weighing between benefi ts and risk. If the benefi t is more and risk is less, then only these procedures are recommended and erformed. The radiation dose to the patient in nuclear medicine is within safe limits. Suitable doses of radiation are used in a controlled way to treat cancer patients. Obviously in this case the benefi ts of radiation exposure far outweigh the possible risks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Siegel JA. Guide for diagnostic nuclear medicine. Reston: Nuclear Regulatory Commission Regulation of Nuclear Medicine, Society of Nuclear Medicine; 2001. p. 4, para 2.5.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Radioactivity in food stuff. Published at http://www.dae.nic.in/?q=node/192/Radioactivityinfoodstuff.

  3. What is Background radiation? Published at http://www.world-nuclear.org/uploadedFiles/org/PageMaker/Radiation/4_Background_Radiation.pdf.

  4. Javad Mortazavi SM. “An Introduction to Radiation Hormesis”. Published at http://www.angelfire.com/mo/radioadaptive/inthorm.html.

  5. Knuuti J, Kajander S, Mäki M, Ukkonen H. Quantification of myocardial blood flow will reform the detection of CAD. J Nucl Cardiol. 2009;16:497–506.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Le Guludec D, Lautamäki R, Knuuti J, Bax JJ, Bengel FM. European Council of Nuclear Cardiology. Present and future of clinical cardiovascular PET imaging in Europe—a position statement by the European Council of Nuclear Cardiology (ECNC). Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2008;35:1709–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kajander SA, Joutsiniemi E, Saraste M, Pietilä M, Ukkonen H, Saraste A, et al. Cardiac positron emission tomography/computed tomography imaging accurately detects anatomically and functionally significant coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2010;122(6):603–13. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.915009. Epub 2010 Jul 26. PMID: 20660808.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Machac J. Cardiac positron emission tomography imaging. Semin Nucl Med. 2005;35:17–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Di Carli MF, Hachamovitch R. New technology for noninvasive evaluation of coronary artery disease. Circulation. 2007;115:1464–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Flotats A, Knuuti J, Gutberlet M, Marcassa C, Bengel FM, Kaufmann PA, Rees MR, Hesse B. Hybrid cardiac imaging: SPECT/CT and PET/CT. A joint position statement by the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM), the European Society of Cardiac Radiology (ESCR) and the European Council of Nuclear Cardiology (ECNC). Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2011;38(1):201–12. doi: 10.1007/s00259-010-1586-y.

  11. Kaufmann PA. Cardiac hybrid imaging: state-of-the-art. Ann Nucl Med. 2009;23:325–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Siegel JA. Guide for diagnostic nuclear medicine. Reston: Nuclear Regulatory Commission Regulation of Nuclear Medicine, Society of Nuclear Medicine; 2001. p. 5.

    Google Scholar 

  13. RADAR Medical Procedure Radiation Dose calculator, http://www.doseinforadar.com/RADARDoseRiskCalc.html, accessed on 17 Mar 2014.

  14. Grimes J, Celler A, Birkenfeld B, Shcherbinin S, Listewnik MH, Piwowarska-Bilska H, et al. Patient-specific radiation dosimetry of 99mTc-HYNIC-Tyr3-octreotide in neuroendocrine tumors. J Nucl Med. 2011;52:1474–81.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ziessman HA, O’Malley JP, Thrall JH. Nuclear medicine: the requisites in radiology, 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Mosby Elsevier; 2006.p. 290. ISBN 978-0-323-02946-9.

    Google Scholar 

  16. International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP). Radiation dose to patients from radiopharmaceuticals, ICRP publication 80. Pergamon: Oxford; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer India

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Prakash, D. (2014). Common Apprehensions About Nuclear Medicine. In: Nuclear Medicine. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1826-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1826-5_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi

  • Print ISBN: 978-81-322-1825-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-81-322-1826-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics