Globalisation Challenges and Knowledge Transfer from the Indian Scientific Diaspora

  • Jean-Claude Bolay
  • Gabriela Tejada
Part of the Dynamics of Asian Development book series (DAD)


This chapter looks at the opportunities and uncertainties of globalisation in terms of the production of world knowledge, with an emphasis on the factors that limit the distribution and fair use of this knowledge for the benefit of less advanced countries. We show how existing disparities between developed countries and emerging and developing countries relating to the level of higher education, the resources available for research and access to technologies and innovation have made scientific cooperation an indispensable mechanism for advancement. Having established this context, we then turn our attention to the transfer of knowledge for the benefit of developing countries, as promoted by the scientific diaspora. Taking the case of India and its relationship with Europe as an example, we present a qualitative analysis based on interviews held with Indian students and researchers who are either living in Europe or who have returned to India, and with some other key informants. India is a paradigmatic case in terms of knowledge, science and technology insofar as the country is a source of skilled personnel for many developed countries, including the European countries that have become popular as new destinations. We look at three determinants for channelling knowledge transfer: institutional mechanisms for bilateral cooperation, transnational collaboration and the affective capital of migrants. We observe how these channels foster scientific cooperation and strengthen the critical mass in the country of origin. While our findings point to a trend whereby scientific diasporas become carriers of knowledge for their countries of origin in the South, there is a need for further studies to examine the specific level of impact that these forms of knowledge transfer generate in the Indian context and to see whether the local society obtains actual benefits from them.


Home Country Knowledge Transfer United Nations Scientific Collaboration Scientific Cooperation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Azoulay, G. (2002). Les théories du développement. Rennes: Presses Universitaires de Rennes.Google Scholar
  2. Banerjee, P. (Ed.). (2009). India, Science and Technology 2008. New Delhi: Indian National Institute of Science, Technology and Development Studies (NISTADS).Google Scholar
  3. Barré, R., Hernández, V., Meyer, J-B., & Vinck, D. (2003). Diasporas scientifiques. Comment les pays en développement peuvent-ils tirer parti de leurs chercheurs et de leurs ingénieurs expatriés?. Paris: Institute de la Recherche pour le Développement.Google Scholar
  4. Bellon, A. (2007). Et Dieu créa la mondialisation. In: Manière de voir. Le Monde Diplomatique N° 91.Google Scholar
  5. Bolay, J.-C. (2004). World globalisation, sustainable development and scientific cooperation. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 7(2), 99–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bolay, J-C. (2012a). Appropriate technologies for sustainable development. In J-C. Bolay, M. Schmid, G.Tejada & E. Hazboun (Eds.), Technologies and innovations for development. Scientific cooperation for a sustainable future (pp. 3–15). Paris: Springer.Google Scholar
  7. Bolay, J.-C. (2012b). What sustainable development for the cities of the South? Urban issues for a third millennium. International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, 4(1), 76–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bruggeman, J. (2008). Social networks: An introduction. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Brunel, S. (2004) Le développement durable. Que sais-je? Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
  11. Caloz–Tschopp, M-C. (2010). Scientific diasporas, migration and development. A perspective from philosophy and political theory. In G. Tejada & J-C. Bolay (Eds.), Scientific diasporas as development partners. Skilled migrants from Colombia, India and South Africa in Switzerland: Empirical evidence and policy responses (pp. 21–136). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  12. Cassarino, J.-P. (2004). Theorising return migration: The conceptual approach to return migrants revisited. International Journal of Multicultural Societies, 6(2), 253–279.Google Scholar
  13. Castells, M. (1996). The rise of the network society. The information age: Economy, society and culture (Vol. I). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  14. Castells, M. (1997). The power of identity. The information age: Economy, society and culture (Vol. II). Cambridge and Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  15. Castells, M. (1998). End of millennium. The information age: Economy, society and culture (Vol. III). Cambridge and Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  16. Castells, M., & Cardoso, G. (2005). The network society: From knowledge to policy. Washington, DC: Johns Hopkins Centre for Transatlantic Relations.Google Scholar
  17. Chase-Dunn, Ch., Kawano, Y., & Brewer, B. (2000). Trade globalization since 1795: Waves of integration in the world-system. American Sociological Review, 65(1), 77–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cyranoski, D., Gilbert, N., Ledford, H., Nayar, A., & Yahia, M. (2011). Education: The PhD factory. The world is producing more PhDs than ever before. Is it time to stop? Nature, 472, 276–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Devarajan, S., Miller, M., & Swanson, E. (2002). Goals for development: history, prospects and costs. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 2819. Washington, DC: World Bank. Accessed 26 August 2013.
  20. Drèze, J., & Sen, A. (2013). An uncertain glory: India and its contradictions. New Delhi: Penguin.Google Scholar
  21. England, K., & Ward, K. (2007). Introduction: Reading neoliberalization. In K. England & K. Ward (Eds.), Neoliberalization: States, networks, peoples (pp. 1–22). Oxford: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. EU, ASM, & IOM. (2012). Success stories. Temporary return of representatives of the Moldovan scientific diaspora. Chisinau: European Union, Academy of Sciences of Moldova, International Organization of Migration, Mission to Moldova. Accessed 13 August 2013.
  23. Eurostat. (2007). Doctorate holders: The beginning of their career (Statistics in Focus—Science and Technology), 131/2007, Accessed on 2 January 2014.
  24. Foray, D. (2004). Economics of knowledge. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  25. Fosu, A. K. (2011). Growth, inequality, and poverty reduction in developing countries: recent global evidence. Working Paper. World Institute for Development Economics Research. Accessed 13 February 2013.
  26. Gaillard, J. (2010). Measuring research and development in developing countries: Main characteristics and implications for the Frascati manual. Science Technology and Society, 15(1), 77–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gorz, A. (2003). L’immatériel. Paris: Editions Galilée.Google Scholar
  28. Gunder Franck, A. (1975). On capitalist underdevelopment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Hollanders, H., & Soete, L. (2010). Le rôle croissant du savoir dans l’économie mondiale. Rapport de l’UNESCO sur la science (pp. 5–31). Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  30. Jones, N., Bailey, M., & Lyytikainen, M. (2007). Research capacity strengthening in Africa: Trends, gaps and opportunities. Overseas Department Institute. Accessed 13 February 2013.
  31. Lapeyre, F. (2006). Objectifs du millénaire pour le développement: outils de développement ou cheval de Troie des politiques néolibérales? In Objectifs du millénaire pour le développement. Points de vue critiques du Sud 13(1). Paris: Syllepse.Google Scholar
  32. Levitt, P. (2001). The transnational villagers. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  33. MacGregor, K. (2009). South Africa: Push to graduate more PhDs. University World News, Issue 30, 31 May, Accessed on 2 January 2014.
  34. Mehra, K. & Pohit, S. (Eds.). (2013). India. Science and technology (Vol. 2).  NISTADS. New Delhi: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  35. Melamed, C., & Scott, L. (2011). After 2015: Progress and challenges for development. Overseas Development Institute. Background Papers. Accessed 13 February 2013.
  36. Meyer, J. B. (2001). Network approach versus brain drain: Lessons from the diaspora. International Migration, 39(5), 91–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Meyer, J. B. (2011). A sociology of diaspora knowledge networks. In T. Faist, M. Fauser, & P. Kivisto (Eds.), The migration-development nexus (pp. 159–184). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  38. Mosneaga, A. (2014). Student migration at the global trijuncture of higher education, competition for talent and migration management. In G. Tejada, U. Bhattacharya, B. Khadria, & Ch. Kuptsch (Eds.), Skilled Indian migration and development: To Europe and back. New Delhi: Springer. (Chapter 5 in this volume).Google Scholar
  39. Nerad, M. (2010). Increase in PhD production and reform of doctoral education worldwide. Higher Education Forum, 7, 69–85.Google Scholar
  40. OECD. (1999). Mesurer les économies fondées sur le savoir. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  41. Özden, C., Rapoport, H., & Schiff, M. (2011a). Five questions on international migration and development. The World Bank Economic Review, 25(1), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Özden, C., Parsons, Ch., Schiff, M., & Walmsley, T. L. (2011b). Where on earth in everybody? The evolution of global bilateral migration 1960–2000. The World Bank Economic Review, 25(1), 12–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Portes, A. (2001). The debates and significance of immigrant transnationalism. Global Networks, 1(3), 181–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Portes, A., Guarnizo, L., & Landolt, P. (1999). The study of transnationalism: Pitfalls and promise of an emergent research field. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 2(22), 217–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Rist, G. (1996). Le développement. Histoire d’une croyance occidentale. Paris: Presses de Sciences Politiques.Google Scholar
  46. Robinson, W. (2001). Social theory and globalization: The rise of a transnational state. Theory and Society, 30(2), 157–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sabates-Wheeler, R., Taylor, L., & Natali, C. (2009). Great expectations and reality checks: The role of information in mediating migrants’ experience of return. European Journal of Development Research, 21, 752–771. doi: 10.1057/ejdr.2009.39 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sachs, I. (1997). L’écodéveloppement. Stratégies pour le XXIe siècle. Paris: Syros.Google Scholar
  49. Sassen, S. (2007). A sociology of globalization. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  50. Saxenian, A. L. (2005). From brain drain to brain circulation: Transnational communities and regional upgrading in India and China. Studies in Comparative International Development, 40(2), 35–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Saxenian, A. L. (2006). The new Argonauts. Regional advantage in a global economy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Stern, N. (2002). Globalization, growth, and poverty: Building an inclusive world economy. Washington, D.C: World Bank and Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Stiglitz, J. E. (2007). Making globalization work. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  54. Tejada, G. (2010). The Colombian scientific diaspora in Switzerland. In G. Tejada & J-C. Bolay (Eds.), Scientific diasporas as development partners: Skilled migrants from Colombia, India and South Africa in Switzerland. Empirical evidence and policy responses (pp. 199–313). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  55. Tejada, G. (2012). Mobility, knowledge and cooperation: scientific diasporas as agents of development. Migration and Development, 10(18), 59–92.Google Scholar
  56. Tejada, G., & Bolay, J-C. (2010). Scientific diasporas as development partners: skilled migrants from Colombia, India and South Africa in Switzerland. Empirical evidence and policy responses. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  57. The Economist. (2010). The disposable academic: Why doing a PhD is often a waste of time, 16 December.
  58. The Royal Society. (2011). Knowledge, networks and nations. Global scientific collaboration in the 21st century. London: The Royal Society. Accessed 13 February 2013.
  59. Tremblay, K. (2005). Academic mobility and immigration. Journal of Studies in International Education, 9(3), 196–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Tujan, A. (2006). OMD: réduire la pauvreté ou édulcorer la mondialisation néolibérale? In Objectifs du millénaire pour le développement. Points de vue critiques du Sud 13(1). Paris: Syllepse.Google Scholar
  61. UNESCO. (2010a). Tendances dans l’enseignement supérieur: l’Afrique subsaharienne. Bulletin d’information de l’Institut de statistique de l ‘UNESCO. No. 10. Accessed 23 August 2013.
  62. UNESCO. (2010b). UNESCO Science Report 2010. The current status of science around the world. Paris: UNESCO.Google Scholar
  63. United Nations. (2000). Resolution adopted by the General Assembly 55/2: United Nations Millennium Declaration. New York: United Nations. Accessed 13 February 2013.
  64. United Nations. (2012). The Millennium Development Goals Report 2012. Department of Economic and Social Affairs. New York: United Nations. Accessed 13 February 2013.
  65. Vertovec, S. (2004). Migrant transnationalism and modes of transformation. International Migration Review, 38(3), 970–1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Vincent-Lancrin, S. (2006). What is changing in academic research? Trends and futures scenarios. Accessed 23 August 2013.
  67. Walby, S. (2009). Globalization and inequalities. Complexity and contested modernities. Los Angeles: SAGE.Google Scholar
  68. WCED. (1987). BrundtlandReport. World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  69. Yussuf, S. (2001). Globalization and the challenge for developing countries. World Bank: Washington, D.C.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Cooperation and Development CenterÉcole Polytechnique Fédérale de LausanneLausanneSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations