Abstract
New chemical entities (NCE) with potential bioactivity are synthesized, isolated, and thoroughly characterized for structure elucidation and purity before being subjected to further research. Spectroscopy is one of the most powerful means to deduce the correct structure and configuration of a compound or a fragment. In organic synthesis, the compounds are usually characterized by the spectral techniques such as ultraviolet–visible (UV–Vis), nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR), infrared (IR), mass spectrometry (MS), X-ray, etc. NMR and MS methods are employed in fragment-based drug discovery approaches to identify compounds from a high-throughput screen or a proteomics experiment. However, it is not possible to manually interpret the complex spectral data that require sophisticated computational tools for characterization. These tools aid in spectra analysis, peaks assignment, intensity, etc. and thereby annotate the compound with the appropriate functional group and fragments. The prediction algorithms are developed based on principles of quantum chemistry, machine learning, or simple database/pattern match-based methods. Some of the methods using quantum chemistry are accurate; however, they require more computational time; on the other hand, the machine learning methods such as neural network are faster but require more experimental data for improving their prediction capability. So, there is a trade-off between speed and accuracy, and the user has to decide his/her preference. A number of spectra prediction tools, commercial as well as open source, are discussed in this chapter accompanied with detailed tutorials on the use of some of them. To manage the data, many online servers and spectral databases are available today and a brief introduction to them is also provided. Here, we also describe an in-house-developed carbon and proton NMR chemical shift-based binary fingerprints and their use in virtual screening.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
http://missionscience.nasa.gov/ems/TourOfEMS_Booklet_Web.pdf. Accessed 31 Oct 2013
Pavia DL, Lampman GM, Kriz GS, Vyvyan JR (eds) (2009) Introduction to spectroscopy. Brooks/Cole Cengage Learning, USA
Gunther H (1995) NMR spectroscopy: basic principles, concepts and applications in organic chemistry. Wiley
McDonald RS (1986) Review: infrared spectrometry. Anal Chem 58:1906–1925
Schoonheydt RA (2010) UV-VIS-NIR spectroscopy and microscopy of heterogeneous catalysts. Chem Soc Rev 39:5051–5066
Watson JT, Sparkman D (2007) Introduction to mass spectrometry. Wiley
Smyth MS, Martin JHJ (2000) X Ray crystallography. Mol Path 53:8–14
Dyer JR (1965) Applications of organic spectroscopy of compounds. Prentice Hall
Silverstein RRM, Webster FK, Kiemle DJ (2005) The spectrometric identification of organic compounds. Wiley
Kalsi PS (2004) Spectroscopy of organic compounds. New age international publishers, New Delhi
Calloway D (1997) Beer-Lambert law. J Chem Educ 74:744
Stuart B (2004) Infrared spectroscopy fundamentals and applications. Wiley, England
Karthikeyan M, Imran (unpublished results)
Hamm P, Zani M (2011) Concepts and methods of 2D Infra red spectroscopy. Cambridge University press, New York
Callaghan PT (1991) Principles of nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Oxford Science Publications, New York
Keeler J (2010) Understanding NMR spectroscopy. Wiley
Richards SA, Hollerton JC (2010) Essential practical NMR for organic chemistry. Wiley
Campos-Olivas R (2011) NMR screening and hit validation in fragment based drug discovery. Curr Top Med Chem 11(1):43–67
Stothers J (1972) Carbon 13 NMR spectroscopy, vol 24 organic chemistry. Academic Press
Clayden J, Greeves N, Warren S (2012) Organic chemistry. Oxford
Hamming MC, Foster NC (1972) Interpretation of mass spectroscopy of organic compounds. Academic Press
Berardi MJ, Shih WM, Harrison SC, Chou JJ (2011) Mitochondrial uncoupling protein 2 structure determined by NMR molecular fragment searching. Nature 476:109–113
Fernandez C, Jahnke W (2004) New Approaches for NMR screening in drug discovery. Drug Discov Today Technol 1(3):277–283
Liu P, Lu M, Zheng Q et al (2013) Recent advances of electrochemical mass spectrometry. Analyst
Kang EH, Lee EY, Lee YJ et al (2008) Clinical features and risk factors of postsurgical gout. Ann Rheum Dis 67:1271–1275
Taber DF (2007) Organic Spectroscopic structure determination: a problem based learning approach. Oxford University Press
Buchnicek J (1950) Colchicine in ripening seeds of the wild saffron (Colchicum autumnale L). Pharm Acta Helv 25:389–401
Shuker SB, Hajduk PJ, Meadows RP, Fesik SW (1996) Discovering high affinity ligands for proteins SAR by NMR. Science 274(5292):1531–1534
Rynchnovsky SD (2006) Predicting NMR spectra by computational Methods: structure revision of hexacyclinol. Org Lett 8:2995–2898
Elyashberg M, Blinov K, Smurnyy Y, Churanova T, Williams A (2010) Empirical and DFT GIAO quantum mechanical methods of 13C chemical shifts prediction competitors or collaborators. Magnet Reson Chem 48(3):209–229
Hu Y, Li Y, Lam H (2011) A semiemprirical approach for predicting unobserved peptide MS MS spectra from spectral libraries. Proteomics 11(4702):4711
Charpenier T (2011) The PAW/GIPAW approach for computing NMR parameters: a new dimension added to NMR study of solids. Solid State Nucl Magn Reson 40(1):1–20
Will M, Joachim R (1997) Spec-Solv an innovation at work. J Chem Inf Comput Sci 37:403–404
Blinov KA, Smurnyy YD, Elyashberg ME, Churanova TS, Kvasha M, Steinbeck C, Lefebvre BA, Williams AJ (2008) Performance validation of neural network of 13C NMR prediction using a publicly available data source. J Chem Inf Model 48:550–555
Pretsch E, Furst A, Bodertscher M, Burgin R (1992) C13Shift: A computer program for the prediction of 13CNMR spectra based on an open set of additivity rules. J Chem Inf Model 32:291–295
http://www.bruker.com/products/mr/NMR/NMR-software/software/topspin/overview.html
Shen Y, Lange O, Delaglio F, Rossi P, Aramini JA, Liu G, Eletsky A, Wu Y, Singarapu KK, Lemak A, Ignatchenko A, Arrowsmith CH, Szyperski T, Montelione GT, Baker D, Bax A (2008) Consistent blind protein structure generation from NMR chemical shift data. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 105(12):4685–4690
http://www.bioNMR.com/forum/NMR-dynamics-21/tensor-2-analysis-overall-internal-dynamics-54/. Accessed 31 Oct 2013
http://www.cambridgesoft.com/Ensemble_for_Chemistry/ChemDraw/. Accessed 31 Oct 2013
http://www.chemaxon.com/marvin/help/calculations/NMRpredict.html. Accessed 31 Oct 2013
http://www.acdlabs.com/products/adh/NMR/NMR_pred/. Accessed 31 Oct 2013
http://mestrelab.com/software/mnova-NMRpredict-desktop/. Accessed 31 Oct 2013
Wiberg KB, Hammer JD, Zilm KW, Cheeseman JR (1999) NMR chemical shifts. 3. A comparison of acetylene, allene, and the higher cumulenes. J Org Chem 64:6394
Spanton SG, Whittern D (2009) The development of an NMR chemical shift prediction application with the accuracy necessary to grade proton NMR spectra for identity. Magn Reson Chem 47(12):1055–1061
Raymond AJ, Mehdi M (2004) The prediction of 1H NMR chemical shifts in organic compounds. Spectrosc Eur 16(4):20–22
http://www.msg.ameslab.gov/gamess/. Accessed 31 Oct 2013
Roesky HW, Walawalkar MG, Ramaswamy M (2001) Is water a friend or foe in organometallic chemistry? The case of group 13 organometallic compounds. Acc Chem Res 34(3):201–211
Gordon MS, Schmidt MW (2005) Advances in electronic structure theory: GAMESS a decade later. In: Dykstra CE, Frenking G, Kim KS, Scuseria GE (eds) Theory and applications of computational chemistry: the first forty years, pp. 1167–1189. Elsevier, Amsterdam
Pagenkopf B (2005) ACD/HNMR Predictor and ACD/CNMR Predictor. J Am Chem Soc 127(9):3232
Chemicke L (2008) Drasar, Pavel Bulletin presents. Comparison of advantages and disadvantages of ACD/1D NMR Assistant, ACD/1D NMR Processor, and ACD/Labs NMR Predictor software. 102(4):299–300
http://insideinformatics.cambridgesoft.com/VideosAndDemos/Default.aspx?ID=52
Wang H (2005) Application of chemdraw nmr tool: correlation of program-generated 13c chemical shifts and pKa values of para-substituted benzoic acids. J Chem Educ 82(9):1340
http://www.schrodinger.com/productpage/14/7/. Accessed on 31 Oct 2013
Saitoa H, Andob I, Ramamoorthy A (2010) Tensors the heart of NMR. Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc 57(20):181–228
Mason J (1993) Solid State Nucl Magn Reson 2:285
Facelli JC (2011) Chemical shift tensors: theory and application to molecular structure problems. Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc 58(3–4):176–201
http://www.gaussian.com/g_whitepap/NMRcomp.htm. Accessed 31 Oct 2013
Nikolic G, Shimazaki T, Yoshihiro A (eds) (2011) Fourier transforms, Gaussian and Fourier Transform (GFT) method and screened Hartree-Fock exchange potential for first-principles band structure calculations. 15–36
http://www.scm.com/Products/Capabilities/SpectroscopicProperties.html. Accessed 31 Oct 2013
Francesco RD, Stener M, Fronzoni G (2012) Theoretical study of near-edge X-ray absorption fine structure spectra of metal phthalocyanines at C and N K-edges. J Phys Chem A 116:2285–22894
Cobas C, Seoane F, Dominiguez S, Sykora S, Davies AN (2011) A new approach to improving automated analysis of proton NMR spectra through global spectral deconvolution(GSD) 23(1)
Jens M, Maier W, Martin W, Reinhard M (2002) Using neural networks for 13C NMR chemical shift prediction-comparison with traditional methods. J Magn Reson 157(2):242–252
Pearlman DA (1996) Fingar: a new genetic algorithm based method for fitting NMR data. J Biomol NMR 8(1):49–66
http://www.wavefun.com/products/spartan.html. Accessed 31 October 2013
Yang S, Bax A (2010) SPARTA + A modest improvement in empirical NMR chemical shift prediction by an artificial neural network. J Biomol NMR 48(1):13–22
Plainchont B, Nuzillard JM (2013) Structure verification though computer assisted spectral assignment of NMR spectra. Magn Reson Chem 51(1):54–59
Bertini I, Felli IC, Kuemmerle R, Moskau D, Pierattelli R (2004) 13C-13C NOESY: an attractive alternative for studying large macromolecules. J Am Chem Soc 126(2):464–465
Kuhn S, Schlorer NE (2012) NMR structure determination in synthetic chemistry. Nachrichten aus der Cemie 60(11):1106–1107
http://www.massbank.jp/?lang=en. Accessed 31 Oct 2013
http://www.swgdrug.org. Accessed 31 Oct 2013
Kazutoshi T, Hayamizu K, Shuitiro O (1991) Analytical sciences, spectral database system on PC with CD-ROM 7 (Suppl., Proc. Int. Congr. Anal. Sci., Pt. 1), 711–712
http://www.sigmaaldrich.com/labware/labware-products.html?TablePage=19816610
Nitsche C (1996) SciFinder 2.0: Preserving the partnership between chemistry and the information professional. Database (Oxford) 19:51
http://jspecview.sourceforge.net/. Accessed 31 Oct 2013
unpublished results
http://pubchem.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/. Accessed 31 Oct 2013
https://www.ebi.ac.uk/chembl/. Accessed 31 Oct 2013
http://www.hmdb.ca/. Accessed 31 Oct 2013
http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/scripts/cder/drugsatfda/. Accessed 31 Oct 2013
Toukach FV, Ananikov VP (2013) Recent advances in computational prediction of NMR parameters for the structural elucidation of carbohydrates: methods and limitations. Chem Soc Rev 42:8376
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer India
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Karthikeyan, M., Vyas, R. (2014). Predictive Methods for Organic Spectral Data Simulation. In: Practical Chemoinformatics. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1780-0_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1780-0_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi
Print ISBN: 978-81-322-1779-4
Online ISBN: 978-81-322-1780-0
eBook Packages: Chemistry and Materials ScienceChemistry and Material Science (R0)