Pelvic organ prolapse (POP) refers to the descent of pelvic organs into the vagina. The prevalence of which varies from 40 % to 50 % over the age of 40 years. The incidence of prolapse increases with increasing age and surgical intervention might not be an ideal option for all. Conservative management should ideally be offered to women with prolapse while discussing their management options. Conservative measures have played a major role in the management of POP both as a short-term intervention and as a definitive management strategy. This includes lifestyle interventions, pelvic floor exercises, and mechanical support devices (pessaries). In assessing the success of conservative measures, it is usually the improvement of patient’s symptoms and the quality of life measures that are analyzed. Prolapse symptoms can include dragging sensation or heaviness in the vagina, backache, and a sensation of lump in the vagina, which may be associated with bladder, bowel, or sexual dysfunction. Objective assessment of POP, with staging using either the Baden-Walker or POP Quantification system, has been undertaken in a few studies evaluating the conservative management.
Stress Urinary Incontinence Pelvic Organ Prolapse Pelvic Floor Muscle Pelvic Floor Muscle Training Pelvic Floor Exercise
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.
Laycock J. Clinical evaluation of the pelvic floor. In: Schüssler B, Laycock J, Norton P, et al., editors. Pelvic floor re-education. London: Springer; 1994. p. 42–8.Google Scholar
Stupp L, Resende AP, Oliveira E, Castro RA, Girao MJ, Sartori MG. Pelvic floor muscle training for treatment of pelvic organ prolapse: an assessor-blinded randomized controlled trial. Int Urogynecol J. 2011;22(10):1233–1239.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagen S, Stark D. Conservative prevention and management of pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(12):CD003882. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD003882.pub4.
Hagen S, Stark D, Glazener C, Dickson S, Barry S, et al. Individualised pelvic floor muscle training in women with pelvic organ prolapse (POPPY): a multicentre randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2014;383(9919):796–806.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cundiff GW, Weidner A, Visco AG, et al. A survey of pessary use by the membership of the American Urogynecology Society. Obstet Gynecol. 2000;95:931–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hanson LA, Schulz JA, Flood CG, Cooley B, Tam F. Vaginal pessaries in managing women with pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence: patient characteristics and factors contributing to success. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2006;17(2):155–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu V, Farell SA, Baskett TF, et al. A simplified protocol for pessary management. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;90:990–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powers K, Lazarou G, Wang A, La Combe J, Besinger G, Greston WM, et al. Pessary use in advanced pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J. 2006;17:160–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sulak PJ, Kuehl TJ, Shull BL. Vaginal pessaries and their use in pelvic relaxation. J Reprod Med. 1993;38:919–23.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Handa VL, Jones M. Do pessaries prevent the progression of pelvic organ prolapse? Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2002;13:349–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cundiff GW, Amundsen CL, Bent AE, et al. The PESSRI study: symptom relief outcomes of a randomized crossover trial of the ring and Gellhorn pessaries. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2007;196(4):405–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mutone MF, Terry C, Hale DS, Benson JT. Factors which influence the short-term success of pessary management of pelvic organ prolapse. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005;193:89–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clemons JL, Aguilar VC, Sokol ER, et al. Patient characteristics that are associated with continued pessary use versus surgery after 1 year. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004;191:159–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones K, Yang L, Lowder JL, et al. Effect of pessary use on genital hiatus measurements in women with pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;112:630–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lone F, Thakar R, Sultan AH, Karamalis G. A 5-year prospective study of vaginal pessary use for pelvic organ prolapse. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2011;114(1):56–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abdool Z, Thakar R, Sultan AH, Oliver RS. Prospective evaluation of outcome of vaginal pessaries versus surgery in women with symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 2011;22(3):273–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robert M, et al. Technical update on pessary use. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2013;35(7):664–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Bugge C, Adams EJ, Gopinath D, Reid F. Pessaries (mechanical devices) for pelvic organ prolapse in women. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(2):CD004010. doi:10.1002/14651858.CD004010.pub3.
Bugge C, Hagen S, Thakar R. Vaginal pessaries for pelvic organ prolapse and urinary incontinence: a multiprofessional survey of practice. Int Urogynecol J. 2013;24:1017–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penrose KJ, Yin J, Tsokos N. Delayed vesicovaginal fistula after ring pessary usage. Int Urogynecol J. 2014;25:291–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geoffrion R, Zhang T, Lee T, Cundiff GW. Clinical characteristics associated with unsuccessful pessary outcomes. Female Pelvic Med Reonstr Surg. 2013;19:339–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar