Evaluation of Low-Cost Bio-technology for Community-Based Domestic Wastewater Treatment

  • Rani Devi


Domestic wastewater is the primary source of pathogens (disease-causing microorganisms) and putrescible organic substances. Pathogenic substances are excreted in faeces and sewage, potentially causing direct threat to public health. Putrescible organic matter causes another type of threat to water quality. So, wastewater must be treated before its discharge into other water bodies or onto the land. There are a large number of technologies used for wastewater treatment, and these have their own advantages or disadvantages. On the basis of advantages of technology, an important area of wastewater treatment is biological treatment and recently known as biotechnology. Microorganisms are isolated then selected, mutated and genetically engineered for effective bioremediation of wastewater. It can be applied for both in situ and ex situ treatment of contaminated wastewater. Biotechnology-based wastewater treatment involves bioaugmentation, bioremediation, bioreactors and phytoremediation. Wastewater can be treated by aerobic or anaerobic or blending of both the techniques. Considering the fact that environmental biotechnology can be operated in an inexpensive, flexible and also environmentally friendly way, there is a long list of areas where biotechnology-based approaches can and will expand in the near future.


Chemical Oxygen Demand Wastewater Treatment Anaerobic Digestion Biochemical Oxygen Demand Domestic Wastewater 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Devi R, Dahiya RP (2006) Chemical oxygen demand (COD) reduction in domestic wastewater by fly ash and brick kiln ash. Int J Water Air Soil Pollut 174(1–4):33–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Evy A, Abigail M, Nilanjana D (2012) Microbial degradation of atrazine, commonly used herbicide. Int J Adv Biol Res 2(1):16–23Google Scholar
  3. Gavrilescu M (2004) Removal of heavy metals from the environment by biosorption. Life Sci Eng 4(3):219–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Glick BR (2003) Phytoremediation: synergistic use of plants and bacteria to clean up the environment. Biotechnol Adv 21:383–393PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Jördening HJ, Winter J (eds) (2004) Environmental biotechnology: concepts and applications. Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, pp 39–48Google Scholar
  6. Khan FI, Husain T, Hejazi R (2004) An overview and analysis of site remediation technologies. J Environ Manag 71:95–122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Khin T, Annachhatre AP (2004) Novel microbial nitrogen removal processes. Biotechnol Adv 22:519–532PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lee K, de Mora S (1999) In situ bioremediation strategies for oiled shoreline environments. Environ Technol 20:783–794CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lens P, Von der Mass P, Zandvoort M, Vallero M (2004) New development in anaerobic environmental biotechnology. In: Ujang Z, Henze M (eds) Environmental biotechnology: advancement in water and wastewater application in tropics. IWA Publishing, London, pp 13–18Google Scholar
  10. Liu Y, Tay JH (2004) State of the art of biogranulation technology for wastewater treatment. Biotechnol Adv 22(5):33–63Google Scholar
  11. Macek T, Macková M, Káš J (2000) Exploitation of plants for the removal of organics in environmental remediation. Biotechnol Adv 18:23–34PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Pieper DH, Reineke W (2000) Engineering bacteria for bioremediation. Curr Opin Biotechnol 11:262–270PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Pletsch M, Santos de Araujo B, Charlwood BV (1999) Novel biotechnological approaches in environmental remediation research. Biotechnol Adv 17:679–687PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Renner R (1997) On the trail of bioremediating microbes. Environ Sci Technol 31:188–189CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Tuppurainen KO, Vaisanen O, Rintal JA (2002) Sulphate reducing laboratory scale high rate anaerobic reactors for treatment of metal and sulphate containing mine wastewater. Environ Technol 23:599–608PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Zhang CZ, Zhang ZY, Liu XJ, Jiang W, Wu Y (2010) Dissipation and environmental fate of herbicide H-9201 in carrot plantings under field conditions. Food Chem 119:874–879CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Energy and Environmental SciencesCh. Devi Lal UniversitySirsaIndia

Personalised recommendations