Advertisement

Wetland-Based Agroforestry Systems: Balancing Between Carbon Sink and Source

  • A. Arunachalam
  • D. Balasubramanian
  • K. Arunachalam
  • J. C. Dagar
  • B. Mohan Kumar
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Agroforestry book series (ADAG, volume 10)

Abstract

Wetlands of India, estimated to be 58.2 million ha, are important repositories of aquatic biodiversity. The diverse ecoclimatic regimes extant in the country resulted in a variety of wetland systems ranging from high altitude cold desert wetland to hot and humid wetlands in coastal zones with its diverse flora and fauna. These ecosystems provide immense services and commodities to humanity. Wetlands perform numerous valuable functions such as recycle nutrients, purify water, attenuate floods, maintain stream flow, recharge ground water, and also serve in providing livelihood to local people in terms of fish, drinking water, fodder, fuel, and environmental services. With rapidly expanding human population, wetlands of India are threatened and facing severe anthropogenic pressures. There is obviously much ground to be covered in our conservation efforts of wetlands. Various agencies at local and government level need to join hands in making these viable, functional, and sustainable. Being diversified farming systems, agroforestry opportunities are abundant in rehabilitation of wetland systems. The nutrient-rich riparian zone provides a suitable site for harnessing the ecosystem services of tree-based farming in the flood plains and in the ecologically fragile hilly region. Ecologically, wetland use as a component in agroforestry may be more acceptable in areas which are facing frequent/seasonal or permanently flooding. It is envisaged that wetland agroforestry can alleviate poverty by making substantial contribution toward local economy in terms of fish and agricultural production.

Keywords

Agroforestry System Mangrove Forest Natural Wetland Colocasia Esculenta Backwater Area 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Ajai BA, Chauhan HB, Sarma KS, Bhattacharya S, Ashutosh S, Pandey CN, Thangaradjou T, Gnanppazham L, Selvam V, Nayak SR (2013) Mangrove inventory of India at community level. Nat Acad Sci Lett 36(1):67–77Google Scholar
  2. Alamgir M, Al-Amin M (2007) Organic carbon storage in trees within different geopositions of chittagong (south) forest division, Bangladesh. J For Res 18(3):174–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Arunachalam A, Khan ML, Arunachalam K (2002) Balancing traditional Jhum cultivation with modern agroforestry in eastern Himalaya-A biodiversity hot spot. Curr Sci 83:117–118Google Scholar
  4. Asian Development Bank (2005) Federated states of Micronesia economic report toward a self sustainable economy. Asian Development Bank, Manila, The Philippines, Pacific Studies Series. http://www.adb.org/sites/default/files/pub/2005/fsm-economic-report.pdf Accessed on 19 Feb 2013
  5. Athens JS, Ward JV, Murakami GM (1996) Development of agroforest on a Micronesian high island: prehistoric Kosraean agriculture. Antiquity 70:834–846Google Scholar
  6. Balasubramanian D, Arunachalam A, Arunachalam K, Das AK (2011) Nutrient accumulation pattern of Eichhornia crassipes Mart. (Solms.) in natural wetlands with different trophic condition. In: Malik DS, Kumar S, Bharti U (eds) Water pollution and management. Biotech Books, New Delhi, pp 30–56Google Scholar
  7. Gopal B (1995) Biodiversity in freshwater ecosystems including wetlands, biodiversity and conservation in India. A status report, vol 4. Zoological Survey of India, CalcuttaGoogle Scholar
  8. Butler S (ed) (2010) Macquarie concise dictionary, 5th edn. Macquarie Dictionary Publishers Ltd., SydneyGoogle Scholar
  9. Chavan BL, Rasal GB (2011) Potentiality of carbon sequestration in six year ages young plant from university campus of Aurangabad. Global J Res Eng 11(7):15–20Google Scholar
  10. Chimner RA, Ewel KC (2004) Differences in carbon fluxes between forested and cultivated Micronesian tropical peatlands. Wetland Ecol Manage 12:419–427CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chimner RA, Ewel KC (2005) A tropical freshwater wetland: II. Production, decomposition and peat formation. Wetland Ecol Manage 13:671–684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Conroy NK, Fares A (2011) A snapshot of agroforestry in Terminalia carolinensis wetlands in Kosrae, Fed States Micronesia 41(2):177–195Google Scholar
  13. Dagar JC (2003) Biodiversity of Indian saline habitats and management and utilization of high salinity tolerant plants with industrial application for rehabilitation of saline areas. In: Alsharhan AA, Wood WW, Gouie AS, Fowler A, Abdellatif EM (eds) Desertification in the third millennium. Swets and Zeitlinger Publishers, Lisse, pp 151–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Dagar JC (2008) Indian mangroves : Status, management and their plausible benefits for livelihood security. J India Soc Coast Agric Res 26(2):121–128Google Scholar
  15. Dagar JC, Mongia AD, Bandyopadhyay AK (1991) Mangroves of Andaman & Nicobar Islands. Oxford & IBH Publishing Co. Ltd., New Delhi, p 166Google Scholar
  16. Dagar JC, Singh G (2007) Biodiversity of Saline and Waterlogged Environments: Documentation, Utilization and Management. NBA Scientific Bulletin Number - 9, National Biodiversity Authority, Tamil Nadu, India, p 78Google Scholar
  17. Dagar JC, Singh NT, Mongia AD (1993) Characteristics of mangrove soils and vegetation of bay islands in India. In: Lieth H, Al Masoom A (eds) Towards the rational use of high salinity tolerant plants, vol 1, Kluwer Academic Publishers, The Netherlands, pp 59–80Google Scholar
  18. Deepa RS, Ramachandra TV (1999) Impact of Urbanization in the interconnectivity of wetlands. In: Proceedings of National Symposium on Remote Sensing Applications for Natural Resources: Retrospective and perspective, Indian Society of Remote Sensing, BangaloreGoogle Scholar
  19. Devi B, Bhardwaj DR, Panwar P, Pal S, Gupta NK, Thakur CL (2013) Carbon allocation, sequestration and carbon dioxide mitigation under plantation forests of north western Himalaya, India. Ann For Res 56(1): 123–135Google Scholar
  20. Dixon RK (1995) Agroforestry systems: sources or sinks of greenhouse gases. Agrofor Syst 31:99–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. DoEP (2011) Glossary. Department of Environmental Protection, state of Florida (http:www.dep.state.fl.us/evergladesforever/about/glossary.html)
  22. Drew WM, Ewel KC, Naylor RL, Sigrah A (2005) A tropical freshwater wetland: III. Direct use values and other goods and services. Wetlands Ecol Manage 13:685–693CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Forestry Paper 153 (2007) The worlds mangroves 1980–2005: a thematic study prepared in the framework of the global forest resources assessment 2005. FAO, Rome, p 77Google Scholar
  24. Fang S, Xu X, Yu X, Li Z (2005) Poplar in wetland agroforestry: a case study of ecological benefits, site productivity, and economics. Wetlands Ecol Manage 13:93–104CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Feller C, Albrecht A, Blanchart E, Cabidoche YM, ChevallierT, Hartmann C, Eschenbrenner V, Larre-Larrouy MC, Ndandou JF (2001) Soil carbon sequestration in tropicalareas: general considerations and analysis of some edaphicdeterminants for lesser antilles soils. Nutr Cycl Agroecosyst 61:19–31Google Scholar
  26. FSI (2011) India state of forest report 2011. forest survey of India, ministry of environment and forests, government of India, Dehra Dun, pp 286Google Scholar
  27. MoEF (2007) Conservation of wetlands in India: a profile. Ministry of environment and forests, government of India, New Delhi, pp56Google Scholar
  28. Namboothiry SS (2000) Romancing with Kerala Backwaters. http://pib.nic.in/feature/feyr2000/fjun2000/f220620002.html Accessed 02 February 2013
  29. Nath AJ, Das AK (2011) Carbon storage and sequestration in bamboo-based smallholder homegardens of Barak valley, Assam. Curr Sci 100(2):229–233Google Scholar
  30. Patil V, Singh A, Naik N, Seema U, Sawant B (2012) Carbon sequestration in mangroves ecosystems. J Environ Res Dev 7(1A):576–583Google Scholar
  31. Parikh J, Parikh K (1999) Sustainable Wetland. Environmental Governance – 2, Indira Gandhi Institute of Development Research, MumbaiGoogle Scholar
  32. Prasad SN, Ramachandra TV, Ahalya N, Sengupta T, kumar A, Tiwari AK, Vijayan VS, Vijayan L (2002) Conservation of wetlands in India–a review. Trop Ecol 43:173–186Google Scholar
  33. Ranabhat S, Awasthi KD, Malla R (2008) Carbon sequestration potential of Alnus nepalensis in the mid hill of Nepal: a case study from Kaski district. BankoJanakari 18(2):3–9Google Scholar
  34. Ranasinghe S (2012) Potential impacts of climate change on coconut. http://climatenet.blogspot.in/2012/07/potential-impacts-of-climate-change-on.html. Accessed 02 Feb 2013
  35. Rizvi RH, Dhyani SK, Yadav RS, Singh R (2011) Biomass production and carbon stock of poplar agroforestry systems in Yamunanagar and Saharanpur districts of northwestern India. Curr Sci 100(5):736–742Google Scholar
  36. Tateda Y (2005) Estimation of CO2 sequestration rate by mangrove ecosystem, http://criepi.denken.or.jp/en/publications/annual/2005/05juten16.pdf. Accessed on 02 Feb 2013
  37. Ullah MR, Al-Amin M (2012) Above- and below-ground carbon stock estimation in a natural forest of Bangladesh. J For Sci 58(8):372–379Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • A. Arunachalam
    • 1
  • D. Balasubramanian
    • 1
  • K. Arunachalam
    • 2
  • J. C. Dagar
    • 1
  • B. Mohan Kumar
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Natural Resource ManagementIndian Council of Agricultural ResearchNew DelhiIndia
  2. 2.School of Environment and Natural ResourcesDoon UniversityDehradunIndia

Personalised recommendations