Reforming the International Monetary System: an Institutional Perspective

  • Jyoti Rahman
  • Ewa Orzechowska-Fischer
  • Redom Syed


The global financial crisis (GFC) drew attention to various imbalances in the international monetary system (IMS), leading to calls for the system to be dismantled. We aim to refocus the debate towards meaningful and achievable action to help guard against future crises. We examine the Group of 20 (G20) and International Monetary Fund’s (IMF) response to the crisis, and argue that the decisive and coordinated response from international policymakers shows that the system is resilient, but needs some maintenance.

Structural changes in the global economy call for structural changes to its guardians. We make the case for reform to the IMF’s governance structures to address the serious legitimacy issues damaging its effectiveness. The system’s evolution must proceed in a timely and responsible way, built around engagement of its key institutions and participants.


International Monetary Fund Global Economy Global Financial Crisis International Monetary System Bretton Wood System 


  1. Au-Yeung W, Kouparitsas M, Luu N, Sharma D (2013) Long-term international GDP projections, Treasury Working Paper Series. Treasury.Google Scholar
  2. Boughton M (2009) A New Bretton Woods, Finance and Development, IMFGoogle Scholar
  3. Bradford C, Wonhyuk L (2011) Toward the consolidation of the G20: from Crisis Committee to Global Steering Committee, Brookings InstituteGoogle Scholar
  4. Carney M (2009) The evolution of the international monetary system. Foreign Policy AssociationGoogle Scholar
  5. Eichengreen B, Irwin D (2009) The slide to protectionism in the great depression: who succumbed and why? National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  6. Independent Evaluation Office (2009) IMF performance in the run-up to the financial and economic crisis, IMF Surveillance in 2004–2007Google Scholar
  7. International Monetary Fund (2011a) Triennial surveillance reviewGoogle Scholar
  8. International Monetary Fund (2011c) Review of flexible credit line and precautionary credit lineGoogle Scholar
  9. International Monetary Fund (2012a) The liberalization and management of capital flows—an institutional viewGoogle Scholar
  10. International Monetary Fund (2012b) One year after the 2011 Triennial Surveillance ReviewGoogle Scholar
  11. International Monetary Fund (2012c) IMF Quota and Governance PublicationsGoogle Scholar
  12. International Monetary Fund (2013a) Managing Directors’ Global Policy AgendaGoogle Scholar
  13. International Monetary Fund (2013b) IMF’s response to the Global Economic Crisis—factsheetGoogle Scholar
  14. Kindleberger C (1973) An explanation of the 1929 depression. In The world in depression, pp 1929–1939. University of California Press, BerkeleyGoogle Scholar
  15. Lim VCS, Pontines V (2012) Global imbalances: a primer. Staff Paper The South East Asian Central Banks Research and Training CentreGoogle Scholar
  16. Moghadam R (2011) Strengthening the International Monetary System: taking stock and looking ahead, IMFGoogle Scholar
  17. Rodrik D (2013) The Past, Present and Future of Economic Growth, Working PaperGoogle Scholar
  18. Romer C (2003) The Great Depression, Berkeley, Forthcoming Paper for Encyclopædia BritannicaGoogle Scholar
  19. Seabrooke L (2006) Resolving the International Monetary Fund’s Legitimacy Crises, Working Paper, International Center for Business and Politics, Copenhagen Business SchoolGoogle Scholar
  20. UN Population Division (2011) World Population Prospects: the 2010 RevisionGoogle Scholar
  21. Xafa M (2010) The role of the IMF in the Global Financial Crisis. Cato J 30(3/Fall):475–489Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jyoti Rahman
    • 1
  • Ewa Orzechowska-Fischer
    • 1
  • Redom Syed
    • 1
  1. 1.International Finance and Development DivisionDepartment of TreasuryCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations