Skip to main content

Estimating Economic Costs of Municipal Solid Waste Management: Using Contingent Valuation Method

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

This paper estimates the welfare loss due to improper municipal solid waste management (MSWM) in Tirunelveli Corporation, which is one of the fast-developing cities in Tamil Nadu. Much of the municipal solid waste stream in Tirunelveli is generated by urban dwellers, whereas landfills are often located in adjacent rural communities. Landfill disposal of municipal solid waste often creates external cost in Tirunelveli and the adjacent areas. The loss of welfare was estimated using econometric methods based on the Logit and Tobit models, which were used to introduce willingness to pay (WTP) to improve the quality of municipal solid waste management. The primary data collected through household surveys are used in the estimation of the models. Measuring external costs of municipal solid waste is very complex and the available methods of economic evaluation are often rudimentary. We have analyzed how the monetary value of health benefits could be increased by adopting an appropriate method of municipal solid waste management, which will be useful to policymakers to reduce vector-borne diseases among the urban population of Tirunelveli city. Variables, such as household income, family size, years of residence, distance from the landfill sites and the respondent’s education, sex and perception of health risks were significantly important in determining a household’s WTP to avoid such vector-borne diseases caused by rampant municipal solid waste. The empirical exercise enables us to measure man-days loss, wage loss and the number of hospital visits due to municipal solid waste management. Thus, this study addresses the current status and consequences of MSWM, which is a matter of concern in developing countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For detailed discussion in this context see Mitchell and Carson (1989) and Cummings et al. (1986).

References

  • Arrow K, Solow R, Portney PR, Leamer EE, Radner R, Schuman H (1993) Report of the NOAA Panel on Contingent Valuation, http://www.darrp.noaa.gov/library/pdf/cvblue.pdf

  • Brookshire DS, Eubanks LS, Randall A (1983) Estimating option prices and existence values for wildlife resources. Land Econ 59:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choe H et al (1996) The β-chemokine receptors CCR3 and CCR5 facilitate infection by primary HIV-1 isolates. Cell 85:1135–1148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cummings RG, Brookshire DS, Schulze WD, (1986) (ed.) Valuing environmental goods: a state of the arts assessment of the contingent valuation method. Totowa, NJ: Roweman and Allanheld.

    Google Scholar 

  • Desvousges WH et al (1993) Measuring natural resource damages with contingent valuation: tests of validity and reliability. In: Hausman JA (ed). Contingent valuation: a critical assessment. North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 91–159

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hausman JA (1993) (ed) Contingent valuation: a critical assessment. North Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Inanace B, Idris A, Terazono A, Sakai S (2004) Development of a database of landfills and dumpsite in Asian countries. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 6:97–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Jha MK, Sondhi OAK, Pansare M (2003) Solid waste management—a case study. Indian J Envron Prot 23(10):1153–1160

    Google Scholar 

  • Khan RR (1994) Environmental management of municipal solid wastes. Indian J Environ Prot 14(1):26–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Loomis JB, duVair PH (1993) Evaluating the effects of alternative risk communication devices on willingness to pay: results from a dichotomous choice contingent valuation experiment. Land Econ 69:287–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merrett S (2002) Deconstructing households’ willingness-to-pay for water in low-income countries. Water Policy 4:157–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell RC, Carson RT (1989) Using surveys to value public goods: the contingent valuation method. Washington, DC: Resource for the Future.

    Google Scholar 

  • MoEF (2000) Municipal solid waste management and handling rules. Ministry of Environment and Forests, Government of India, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Niklitschek M, Leon J (1996) Combining intended demand and yes/no responses in the estimation of contingent valuation models. J Environ Econ Manage 31:387–402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyangababo JT, Hamya JW (1980) The deposition of lead, cadmium, zinc and copper from motor traffic on Bradaria Enimi and soil along a major Bombo road. Int J Environ Stud Legol 1(32):117

    Google Scholar 

  • Reddy S, Galab S (1998) An integrated economic and environmental assessment of solid waste management in India—the case of Hyderabad, India. An unpublished report, Centre for Economic and Social Studies, Andhra Pradesh, India

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith VK (2006) “Fifty Years of Contingent Valuation.” In A. Alberini and J.R. Kahn, eds., Handbook on Contingent Valuation. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar Publishing

    Google Scholar 

  • Sudhakar Y, Sarika K (2003) Economic insight into municipal solid waste management in Mumbai: a critical analysis. Int J Environ Pollut 19(5):516–527

    Google Scholar 

  • Walsh RG, Loomis JB, Gillman RA (1984) Valuing option, existence and bequest demands for wilderness. Land Econ 60:14–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittington D (1998) Administering contingent valuation surveys in developing countries. World Dev 26:21–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Sacratees .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer India

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sacratees, J., Hari Govindaraj, G. (2014). Estimating Economic Costs of Municipal Solid Waste Management: Using Contingent Valuation Method. In: Sridhar, K., Wan, G. (eds) Urbanization in Asia. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1638-4_11

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics