Advertisement

Developmental Aspirations and Networked Readiness

  • Amita Singh
Chapter

Abstract

The world is a network of wires for most of us in the universities and policy sciences. Development has become data based made available through these many networks. The challenge of development is about managing networks which has also been one of the MDG located in the eighth place. The 2012 MDG Task Force laments for the miserable performance of nations on the achievement of this goal. ICT facilitates the networking process. But how well are countries placed to network and develop into knowledge economies? Development and ICTs are related and nothing proves it better than the rising GDP of countries as the score on ‘Networked Readiness Index’ (NRI) goes up. NRI is propensity of countries to exploit opportunities for bringing development. Granularity of metadata which serves as a design for the purpose of studying e-governance in different countries has become finer over the last decade. From the 2003 UN Survey woven around the minimum threshold level of technological infrastructure, human capital and e-connectivity has deepened to a complicated set of data which is diverse yet each data field can be treated in isolation. e-Government Readiness Index (EGRI) is composed of three indices WMI, TII and HCI which deal with the websites of countries, their infrastructure for e-governance and lastly their human capital availability. A short description about the three would explain how they reflect upon the government’s e-readiness. Networked governance is an expression used for modern day governance where administrative agencies work in partnerships and in communication with many other governmental and nongovernmental agencies for political, informational and social reasons. Lastly comes the warning that a substantial level of e-governance can be achieved provided the developmental aspirations of people and networked readiness are appropriately synchronised.

Keywords

Millennium Development Goal Network Governance Economist Intelligence Unit Judicial Service Commission Retail Financial Service 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Bibliography

  1. Arquette TJ (2001) Assessing the digital divide empirical analysis of a metaanalytic framework for assessing the current state of information and communication system development. www.sourceoecd.org. Retrieved 11 Mar 2006
  2. Bimber B (2001) Information and political engagement in America: the search for effects of information technology at the individual level. Polit Res Quart 54(1):53–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bouaziz F (2008) Public administration presence on the web: a cultural explanation. The Electron J of e-Government 6(1):11–22. Available online at www.ejeg.com Google Scholar
  4. Bridges.org (2005) E-ready for what? E-readiness in developing countries: current status and prospects toward the millennium development goals. infoDev – The World Bank, Washington, DC. http://www.infodev.org/files/2049_file_InfoDev_E_Rdnss_Rpt_rev11May05.pdf. Retrieved 21 Feb 2006
  5. Brynjolfsson E (1993) The productivity paradox of information technology. Commun ACM 36(12):66–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bui TX, Sankaran S, Sebastian IM (2003) A framework for measuring national e-readiness. Int J Electron Bus 1(1):3–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Business Software Alliance 2013Google Scholar
  8. Chavez v. NHA et al., G.R. No. 164527, August 15, 2007.Supreme Court of Manila, PhilippinesGoogle Scholar
  9. Commission on the Measurement of Economic Performance and Social Progress (CMEPSP) (2008) http://www.stat.si/doc/drzstat/Stiglitz%20report.pdf
  10. CUTS (2010) Analysing the right to information in India, Jaipur: CUTS CART Briefing Paper No.1 Studies on consumer unity and Trust SocietyGoogle Scholar
  11. Davison RM, Vogel DR, Harris RW, Jones N (2000) Technology leapfrogging in developing countries: an inevitable luxury? Electron J Inform Syst Dev Countries 1(5):1–10Google Scholar
  12. Dorgan S, Dowdy J (2004) When IT lifts productivity. McKinsey Quart (4):13–15 as adapted and cited by Arlotto P, Irby S (eds) (2012) Improving value through accountable meaningful use: a framework. In: Arlotto P, Irby S (eds) Rethinking return on investment: the challenge of accountable meaningful use, pp 14–22. Healthcare Information and Management Systems Society, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  13. Dutta S, Bilbao-Osorio B, Geiger T (2012) The networked readiness index 2012: benchmarking ICT progress and impacts for the next decade. Global Information Technology Report, GITR. World Economic Forum, pp 3–29. http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GITR_Report_year. pdf
  14. Economic Intelligence Unit (2006) The 2006 e-readiness ranking. Economic Intelligence Unit & IBM Institute, LondonGoogle Scholar
  15. Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU) (2001) E-readiness rankings 2001. http://www.ebusinessforum.com/
  16. Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU) (2002) Country profiles 2002. http://www.ebusinessforum.com/
  17. Erumban AA, de Jong SB (2006) Cross –country differences in ICT adoption: a consequence of culture? J World Bus 41(4):302–314, ElsevierCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Global Information Technology Report (2012)Google Scholar
  19. Hamelink CJ (1997) New information and communication technologies, social development and cultural change. Discussion paper no. 86.UNRISD, Geneva. http://www.unrisd.org/engindex/publ/list/dp/dp86/dp86.htm
  20. Hamelink CJ (2001) Confronting cultural rights. Media Development (4):44–47Google Scholar
  21. Harindranath G, Liebenau JL (1998) National information infrastructure policies in international perspective, UNIDO emerging technology series. UNIDO, ViennaGoogle Scholar
  22. Heeks R (1998) Information technology and public sector corruption, vol 4, Information systems for public sector management working paper. IDPM, ManchesterGoogle Scholar
  23. Heeks R (1999a) Information and communication technologies, poverty and development. IDPM Publications, Development Informatics: working papers, 5/1999Google Scholar
  24. Heeks R (1999b) Centralised vs. decentralised management of public information systems: a core-periphery solution, vol 7, Information systems for public sector management working paper. IDPM, ManchesterGoogle Scholar
  25. Heeks R (2010) Do information and communication technologies (ICTs) contribute to development? J Int Dev 22(5):625–640CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hofstede G, Hofstede GJ, Minkov M (2010) Cultures and organizations: software of the mind. McGraw Hill Professional, NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  27. Information and Communication Technology (Amendment) Act 2008Google Scholar
  28. Lallana EC, Pascual PJ, Soriano ES (2002) e-Government in the Philippines: benchmarking against global best practices. Digital Philippines, Manila. www.digitalphilippines.org, April
  29. Mahathir M (1982) The challenge! 3rd edn. Penerbitan Pustaka Antara, Kuala Lumpur (In Malay)Google Scholar
  30. Mahathir M, Ishihara S (1995) The voice of Asia: two leaders discuss the coming century. Kodansha International, TokyoGoogle Scholar
  31. Maier S (2007) Empowering women through ICT-based business initiatives: an overview of best practices in e-commerce/e-retailing projects, Information Technologies and International Development, vol 4(2), Winter, http://itidjournal.org/itid/article/viewFile/255/125
  32. Malone TW, Rockart JF (1991) Computers, networks and the corporation. Sci Am 265(3):128–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Manyika J, Roxburgh C (2011) The great transformer: the impact of the internet on economic growth and prosperity, McKinsey Global Institute. www.mckinsey.com/mgi. October UNPAN
  34. McKinsey Global Institute (2012) The social economy: unlocking value and productivity through social technologies. Available at http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/high_tech_telecoms_internet/the_social_economy
  35. Mossberger K, Tolbert CJ, Franko WW (2013) Digital cities: the Internet and the geography of opportunity. Oxford University Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  36. Piatkowski M (2004) The impact of ICT on growth in transition economies. TIGER working paper series, no. 59. July. Warsaw. From: http://www.tiger.edu.pl/publikacje/TWPNo59.pdf
  37. Pigato MA (2001) Information and communication technology, poverty, and development in sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia, Africa Region. Working paper series no. 20, August, The World Bank, Washington. Available at http://www.worldbank.org/afr/wps/wp20.htm
  38. Ricardo V et al. vs Feliciano B Jr. G.R. No. 74930 February 13, 1989. Supreme Court of Manila, PhilippinesGoogle Scholar
  39. Sein MK, Ahmad IU (2001) A framework to study the impact of information and communication technologies on developing countries: the case of cellular phones in Bangladesh. In: Proceedings of BITWORLD2001, CairoGoogle Scholar
  40. Solow RM (1987) We’d better watch out. New York Times Book Review, July 12Google Scholar
  41. U.N. Resolution (1946) A/59/R1 available at Department of Public Information (DPI), Dag Hammarskjöld Library (DHL). http://www.un.org/depts/dhl/resguide/r1.htm
  42. UN General Assembly (2000) United Nations millennium declaration, (A/RES/55/2) 8th September, United Nations, New York. Available at http://www.un.org/millennium/declaration/ares552e.htm
  43. UN Public Administration Programme (2008) United Nations e-government survey ‘from e-government to connected governance’. UN Publications, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  44. UNDP (2000) United Nations millennium declaration. Retrieved at http://www.un.org/millennium/declaration/ares552e.htm. ( Para III.11.)
  45. UNDP (2003) Human development report. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  46. UNDP (2012) Millennium development goal 8, The global partnership for development: making rhetoric a reality, The MDG Gap Task Force Report. United Nations Publications, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  47. UNDP (2013) From connectivity to service delivery: case studies in e-governance. Independent UN Publications, New York. http://www.undpegov.org/
  48. UNPublic Administration Network (2009) E-government readiness. UN Publications, New York. http://www.unpan.org/egovkb/
  49. WHO/UNICEF (2013a) Joint monitoring programme for water supply and sanitation (JMP), published in the “Progress on drinking water and sanitation – 2013 update”. Available at http://www.wsp.org/sites/wsp.org/files/publications/Sanitation_Impact_Synthesis_2.pdf
  50. WHO/UNICEF (2013b) Progress on sanitation and drinking water. WHO/UNICEF, Geneva/New YorkGoogle Scholar
  51. Wilson D (1995) IT Investment and its productivity effects: an organizational sociologist’s perspective on direction for future research. Econ Innov New Technol 4(3):235–251. Working paper series no. 59. July. Warsaw. From: http://www.tiger.edu.pl/publikacje/TWPNo59.pdf
  52. Wilson EJ (2004) The information revolution and developing countries. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  53. World Bank (2001) World Development Indicators. http://www.worldbank.org/data/wdi2001/index.htm
  54. World Bank (2002a) Knowledge Assessment Matrix (KAM). http://www1.worldbank.org/gdln/kam.htm
  55. World Bank (2002b) Statistical Information Management Analysis (SIMA) Database, Limited Edition at http://devdata.worldbank.org/query/
  56. Yang SC (2001) A theory of information infrastructure and information societies: New evidence on the effects of telecommunication investment, Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Claremont Graduate University, USAGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amita Singh
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for the Study of Law and GovernanceJawaharlal Nehru UniversityNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations