Qualitative Phase: Mismanagement of the Factors Affecting and Discriminating Sustainability—Learnings from Indian Microfinance Crisis

  • Nadiya Marakkath
Part of the India Studies in Business and Economics book series (ISBE)


In the preceding chapter, the strategies used by the efficient and sustainable Indian Microfinance Institutions (MFIs), to manage the determinant and discriminant factors of their sustainability are documented. This documentation is expected to serve as a reference for other relatively less efficient Indian MFIs to understand how their efficient and sustainable counterparts are managing sustainability. Though this knowledge is important for them to improve sustainability, it is also pertinent for MFIs to understand the dangers that are imminent, if they mismanage the sustenance factors. Mismanagement occurs if MFIs become overly conscious of sustainability, oblivious of its impact on client welfare. By referring to Indian microfinance crisis and the literature associated with it, the author portrays such mismanagement issues and the adverse affects it can have on microfinance clients. This discussion ends by reminding the MFI players of an old tenet that governs the sector: sustainability is only a means to achieve the goal of poverty alleviation, and not an end in itself.


Initial Public Offering Loan Portfolio Portfolio Risk Microfinance Institution Loan Size 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Bamzai (2010) We’ve never been accused of abetting suicides. Business TodayGoogle Scholar
  2. Banerjee A, Bardhan P, Duflo E, Field E, Karlan D, Khwaja A, Mookherjee D, Pande R, Rajan R (2010) Help microfinance, don’t kill it. Indian ExpressGoogle Scholar
  3. Consultative Group to Assist the Poor (CGAP) 2010 Indian microfinance goes public: the SKS initial public offering. http://www.microfinancegateway.org/gm/document-1.9.47761/FN65-1.pdf. Retrieved 25 Jan 2010
  4. Guha, Marakkath (2013) Are microfinance services relevant for micro-entrepreneurial growth: a case based discussion from Indian microfinance models. Paper accepted for presentation at 4th international conference on Institutional and Technological Environment for Microfinance (ITEM4), ParisGoogle Scholar
  5. Kumar V, Rozas D (2010) Exclusive: SKS microfinance journey to IPO—an inside story. microfinance focus. http://www.microfinancefocus.com/news/2010/05/17/exclusive-sks-microfinance-journey-to-ipo-an-insidestory/. Retrieved 25 Jan 2010
  6. Malegam Committee Report (2011) Report of the Reserve Bank of India sub-committee of its central board of directors to study issues and concerns in the Micro Finance Institutions (MFI) sector. Reserve Bank of India. http://www.rbi.org.in/scripts/BS_PressReleaseDisplay.aspx?prid=23780. Retrieved 25 Feb 2010
  7. Nadiya M, Olivares-Polanco F, Radha Ramanan T (2012) Dangers in mismanaging the factors affecting the operational self-sustainability (OSS) of Indian microfinance institutions (MFIs) – an exploration into Indian microfinance crisis. Asian Econ Financ Rev 2(3):448–462 (Asian Economic and Social Society)Google Scholar
  8. Prabhu G (2011) Publically held microfinance firms are a form of organized crime in emerging economies. Paper presented at academy of management meeting, cross divisional paper session of managing in emerging economy and multinational contexts, San AntonioGoogle Scholar
  9. Rhyne E (1998) The Yin and Yang of microfinance: reaching the poor and sustainability. MicroBank Bull 2(1):6–8Google Scholar
  10. Sinha S (2010) How to calm the charging bull: an agenda for CGAP in the decade of the Teneeis. Micro-Credit Rating International Limited, GurgoanGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nadiya Marakkath
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Management & Labour StudiesTata Institute of Social Sciences Centre for Social EntrepreneurshipMumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations