Qualitative Phase: Management of Factors Affecting and Discriminating Sustainability

  • Nadiya Marakkath
Part of the India Studies in Business and Economics book series (ISBE)


In this chapter four out of the seven efficient and sustainable Microfinance Institutions (MFIs) identified in the intermediate participant selection phase of the study, are interviewed by the author. These interviews mark the beginning of the qualitative phase of the study. This phase aims to understand about the managerial aspects of the factors that affect and discriminate the sustainability of Indian MFIs. As per the findings of the quantitative phase, Growth Factor, Portfolio Risk Factor, Development Factor and Institutional Factor are the significant factors found to affect the sustainability of Indian MFIs and Cost Efficiency Factor is found to discriminate the sustainability of Indian MFIs. The intent of undertaking the interviews in this phase of the study, is to understand how these four efficient and sustainable MFIs are managing these five determinant and discriminate factors, found significant in the quantitative phase. The strategies used by these MFIs to manage these five factors are documented for the reference of other MFIs in the sector. Prior to the discussion on the strategies used to manage the five factors, confirmation is sought from the MFI managers about the observed relationships shared by the factors with Operation Self-Sustainability (OSS) ratio, as seen significant in the quantitative phase of the study.


Downside Risk Quantitative Phase Loan Portfolio Portfolio Risk Qualitative Phase 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Boyatzis R (1998) Transforming qualitative information: thematic analysis and code development. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  2. Crabtree B, Miller W (1999) A template approach to text analysis: developing and using codebooks. In: Crabtree B, Miller W (eds) Doing qualitative research. Sage, Newbury Park, pp 163–177Google Scholar
  3. Fereday J, Muir-Cochrane E (2006) Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: a hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. Int J Qual Method 5(1):7Google Scholar
  4. Johnson D, Meka S (2010) Access to finance in Andhra Pradesh. Centre for Microfinance. Institute for Financial Management and Research Publication, ChennaiGoogle Scholar
  5. Malegam Committee Report (2011) Report of the Reserve Bank of India Sub-Committee of its Central Board of Directors to Study Issues and Concerns in the Micro Finance Institutions (MFI) Sector. Reserve Bank of India. http://www.rbi.org.in/scripts/BS_PressReleaseDisplay.aspx?prid=23780. Retrieved 25 Feb 2010
  6. Marakkath N (2012) Innovative strategies used by Indian MFIS to achieve cost efficiency. Int J Financ Bank Stud 1(1):2147–4486Google Scholar
  7. Schutz A (1967) The phenomenology of the social world (trans: Walsh G, Lehnert F). North Western University Press, Evanston (Original German Work Published, 1932)Google Scholar
  8. Yin RK (1994) Case study research: design and methods, 3rd edn. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nadiya Marakkath
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Management & Labour StudiesTata Institute of Social Sciences Centre for Social EntrepreneurshipMumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations