Quantitative Phase: Identification of Factors Affecting and Discriminating Sustainability

  • Nadiya Marakkath
Part of the India Studies in Business and Economics book series (ISBE)


A three-phased sequential explanatory mixed-methods research framework is designed to conduct the research investigation presented in this book. The first phase of this design, which is quantitative in nature, is presented in this chapter. This quantitative phase is pursued to accomplish the first and second objectives of the study, which aims to identify the determinant and discriminant factors for the sustainability of Indian Microfinance Institutions (MFIs). Identifying these factors is pertinent, as it calls for managerial attention from any Indian MFI aiming to augment its sustainability. Therefore to fulfill these objectives, the author undertakes a quantitative analysis on the data sourced from 50 Indian MFIs. Regression and discriminant analysis techniques are used to conduct this analysis. The results of this analysis depict, Growth Factor, Portfolio Risk Factor, Development Factor and Institutional Factor as the significant factors affecting the Operational Self-sustainability (OSS) of Indian MFIs and Cost Efficiency Factor as the factor discriminating its OSS status. Thus at the end of this chapter, the author narrows done to five significant factors that determine and discriminate the OSS status of Indian MFIs.


Discriminant Analysis Discriminant Function Proxy Variable Quantitative Phase Loan Portfolio 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Altman EI (1968) Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. J Financ 23(4):189–209CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashim KK (2010) Sustainability and mission drift in microfinance: empirical studies on mutual exclusion of double bottom lines. Published Doctoral Thesis, Hanken School of Economics, HelsinkiGoogle Scholar
  3. Ayayi A, Sene M (2007) What drives microfinance institution’s financial sustainability. J Dev Area 44(1):303–324CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bhatt N, Tang SY (2001) Delivering microfinance in developing countries: controversies and policy perspective. Policy Stud Organ 29(2):319–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bogan V (2008) Microfinance institutions: does capital structure matter? www.papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1144762&rec=1&srcabs=1480844. Retrieved 25 Dec 2010
  6. Christen RP (2001) Commercialization and mission drift. The transformation of microfinance in Latin America. Consultative Group to Assist the Poor (CGAP) Occasional Paper 5, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  7. Churchill C (2000) Banking on customer loyalty. J Microfinanc 2:1–21Google Scholar
  8. Coleman AK (2007) The impact of capital structure on the performance of microfinance institutions. J Risk Financ 8(1):56–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Conning J (1999) Outreach, sustainability and leverage in monitored and peer monitoring lending. J Dev Econ 60:229–248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Crombrugghe AD, Tenikue M, Sureda J (2008) Performance analysis for a sample of microfinance institutions in India. Ann Pub Coop Econ 79(2):269–299CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cull R, Kunt AD, Morduch J (2007) Financial performance and outreach: a global analysis of leading MicroBank. Econ J 117:107–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. D’Espallier B, Guerin I, Mersland R (2011) Women and repayment in microfinance: a global analysis. World Dev 39(5):758–772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fisher RA (1936) The use of multiple measurements in taxonomic problems. Ann Eugen 7(2):179–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ghatak M (2000) Screening by the company you keep: joint liability lending and the peer selection effect. Econ J 110:601–631CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ghatak M, Guinnane TW (1999) The economics of lending with joint liability: theory and practice. J Dev Econ 60:195–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gujarati D, Sangeetha S (2007) Basic econometrics. Tata McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  17. Intellecap (2010) Indian microfinance crisis of 2010: turf war or a battle of intentions? An Intellecap white paper. Intellecap, HyderabadGoogle Scholar
  18. Littlefield E, Rosenberg R (2004) Microfinance and the poor: breaking down walls between microfinance and formal finance. Financ Dev 41(2):38–40Google Scholar
  19. Malegam Committee Report (2011) Report of the Reserve Bank of India sub-committee of its Central Board of Directors to study issues and concerns in the Micro Finance Institutions (MFI) sector, Reserve Bank of India. http://www.rbi.org.in/scripts/BS_PressReleaseDisplay.aspx?prid=23780. Retrieved 25 Dec 2010
  20. Malhotra KN (2003) Marketing research—an applied orientation. Prentice-Hall, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  21. Marakkath N, Ramanan TR (2012) What discriminates the operational self-sustainability of Indian MFIs: a multiple discriminant analysis inquiry. Paper presented at 3rd international conference on Institutional and Technological Environment for Microfinance (ITEM3) on Cost Management & Social Performance in Microfinance, New Delhi, 4–7 Jan 2012. Organized by Burgundy School of Business, France (Secured Top Paper Presentation Award)Google Scholar
  22. Nair A (2005) Sustainability of microfinance self help groups in India: would federating help? World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3516Google Scholar
  23. Navajas S, Schreiner M, Richard M, Claudio G, RodriguezMeza J (2000) Microcredit and the poorest of the poor: theory and evidence from Bolivia. World Dev 28(2):333–346CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nisha B (2007) Microfinance and microfinance institutions in India: issues and challenges. Network 11(2):1Google Scholar
  25. Olivers-Polanco F (2005) Commercializing microfinance and deepening outreach? Empirical evidence from Latin America. J Microfinanc 7(2):38–40Google Scholar
  26. Pischke V (1996) Measuring the trade-off between outreach and sustainability of microentreprise lenders. J Int Dev 8:225–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Qayyum A, Ahmad M (2006) Efficiency and sustainability of micro finance institutions in South Asia. MPRA Paper 11674, University Library of Munich, Germany. http://www.saneinetwork.net/pdf/SANEI_VI/SANEI-VI%20PROJECT%207%20Efficiency%20and%20Sustainability%20of%20Micro%20Finance%20Institutions%20in%20South%20Asia.pdf. Retrieved 25 Dec 2010
  28. Robinson SM (1996) Addressing some key questions on finance and poverty. J Int Dev 8:153–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Savitha S (2007) Transaction cost in group microcredit in India. Case studies of three micro finance institutions. Working paper series. The Institute of Financial Management and Research, Centre of Microfinance, Chennai, India. http://www.ifmr.ac.in/cmf/publications/wp/2006/13_shankar-caseStudyMFIs.pdf. Retrieved 6 May 2010
  30. Venkatraman S, RajSekhar T (2008) For India’s microfinance institutions, governance is the key to sustained and scalable growth. www.standardandpoors.com/ratingsdirect. Retrieved 25 Dec 2010

Copyright information

© Springer India 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nadiya Marakkath
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Management & Labour StudiesTata Institute of Social Sciences Centre for Social EntrepreneurshipMumbaiIndia

Personalised recommendations