Diversity as a Livelihood Strategy Near Mudumalai, Tamil Nadu: An Inquiry

  • Tarsh Thekaekara
  • Nishita Vasanth
  • Thomas F. Thornton


While the Valaiyars of Karandamalai Hills and most of the peripheral farming communities of Kanakapura have expanded their livelihood portfolios in response to the changes around them, for the ‘fringe’ forest communities of the Nilgiri Hills of Tamil Nadu, dependence on hunting and gathering remains high despite extensive engagement with the cash economy. The Kattunayakan and Bettakurumba people’s cultural model of the forest as communities of ‘other than human persons’ remains an important ontological and epistemological constraint in their engagement with forest ‘resources’. This case study assesses a progressive environmental NGO intervention in these communities, seeking to reduce the spread of an invasive woody shrub, Lantana camara, by helping local communities set up a ‘Lantana furniture centre’ for the conversion of the woody shrub into marketable furniture, a seemingly perfect conservation and development solution. However, instead of adopting the plan and intensifying production of Lantana, communities engaged in the industry only as a part-time activity and in ways complementary to their existing portfolio of livelihood activities. The study evaluates the limited success of the Lantana Craft Centre initiative by examining how the scheme clashed with the hunter-gatherer worldview and cultural models of the relationship between personhood and livelihood. The lessons from this Lantana furniture centre are more broadly relevant to issues in conservation, development and adaptation to biodiversity change in hunting-gathering and other forest communities.


Livelihood Activity Fuel Wood Forest Department Wild Food Wage Labour 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



We thank Ramesh Kannan and others at ATREE for helping launch the Lantana furniture project in Gudalur; Rajeev K. Srivastava, the Chief Conservator of Forests and Field Director of Mudumalai, for all his support and help in funding the Chembakolli EDC through the Mudumalai Tiger Foundation; Ramesh Madan, Jobi Thomas, H. Madhusudanan and others at The Shola Trust who have been involved in the Lantana Project and Shonil Bhagwat and Kathy Willis for various discussions around invasive species and helping in shaping some of the ideas in this chapter. We also thank the Rufford Small Grants Foundation for supporting a part of the Lantana project. Thornton’s work was funded in part by the framework project NE/I004149/ on human adaptation to biodiversity change, with support from the Ecosystem Services for Poverty Alleviation (ESPA) programme. The ESPA programme is funded by the Department for International Development (DFID), the Economic and Social Research Council (ESRC) and the Natural Environment Research Council (NERC).


  1. Achhireddy, N. R., & Singh, M. (1984). Allelopathic effects of Lantana (Lantana camara) on Milkweedvine (Morrenia odorata). Weed Science, 32, 757–761.Google Scholar
  2. Bhagwat, S. A., Breman, E., Thekaekara, T., Thornton, T. F., & Willis, K. J. (2012). A battle lost? Report on two centuries of invasion and management of Lantana camara L. in Australia, India and South Africa. PLoS One, 7(3), e32407. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0032407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bird-David, N. (1987). The Kurumbas of the Nilgiris: An ethnographic myth? Modern Asian Studies, 21(01), 173–189.Google Scholar
  4. Bird-David, N. (1990). The giving environment: Another perspective on the economic system of gatherer-hunters. Current Anthropology, 31(2), 189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bird-David, N. (1992). Beyond ‘the hunting and gathering mode of subsistence’: Culture-sensitive observations on the Nayaka and other modern hunter-gatherers. Man, 27(1), 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bird-David, N. (1994). The Nilgiri tribal systems: A view from below. Modern Asian Studies, 28(2), 339–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bird-David, N. (1999). ‘Animism’ revisited: Personhood, environment, and relational epistemology. Current Anthropology, 40(Supplement), 67–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chambers, R., & Conway, G. (1992). Sustainable rural livelihoods: Practical concepts for the 21st century (IDS Discussion Paper 296). Brighton: IDS.Google Scholar
  9. Day, M. D., Wiley, C. J., Playford, J., & Zalucki, M. P. (2003). Lantana: Current management, status and future prospects (ACIAR Monograph 102). Canberra: Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research.Google Scholar
  10. Dorga, R. K. (2007). Management plan for the Mudumalai Sanctuary and National Park, 2007–2012. Madras: Government Press.Google Scholar
  11. Endicott, K. (1979). Batek Negrito religion: The world-view and rituals of a hunting and gathering people of Peninsular Malaysia. Oxford/New York: Clarendon Press/Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Escobar, A. (1995). Encountering development: The making and unmaking of the third world. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Hallowell, A. I. (1960). Ojibwa ontology, behavior, and worldview. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
  14. Hockings, P. (2008). All Aboard the Nilgiri Express! – Sustained Links between Anthropology and a Single Indian District. History and Anthropology, 19(1), 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Ingold, T. (1994). From trust to domination – An alternative history of human-animal relations. In T. Ingold (Ed.), The perception of the environment: Essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill (pp. 61–76). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Johnsingh, A. J. T., Raghunath, R., & Madhusudhan, M. D. (2008). Suggested extension for the Mudumalai Tiger Reserve, a unique tiger landscape in India. Mysore: Nature Conservation Foundation.Google Scholar
  17. Love, A., Babu, S., & Babu, C. R. (2009). Management of Lantana, an invasive alien weed, in forest ecosystems of India. Current Science, 97(10), 1421–1429.Google Scholar
  18. Manfredo, M. J., & Dayer, A. A. (2004). Concepts for exploring the social aspects of human–wildlife conflict in a global context. Human Dimensions of Wildlife: An International Journal, 9(4), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Parsons, W. T., & Cuthbertson, E. G. (2001). Noxious weeds of Australia (2nd ed.). Collingwood/Melbourne: CSIRO Publishing.Google Scholar
  20. Scoones, I. (1998). Sustainable rural livelihoods: A framework for analysis (IDS Working Paper 72). Brighton: Institute of Development Studies.Google Scholar
  21. Sharma, O. P., Makkar, H. P. S., Dawra, R. K., & Negi, S. S. (1981). A review of the toxicity of Lantana camara (Linn) in animals. Clinical Toxicology, 18, 1077–1094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sharma, G. R., Raghubanshi, A. S., & Singh, J. S. (2005). Lantana invasion: An overview. Weed Biology and Management, 5, 157–165.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Suresh, H. S., Dattaraja, H. S., & Sukumar, R. (2010). Relationship between annual rainfall and tree mortality in a tropical dry forest: Results of a 19-year study at Mudumalai, Southern India. In Adaptation of forests and forest management to changing climate selected papers from the conference on ‘Adaptation of forests and forest management to changing climate with emphasis on forest health: A review of science, policies and practices’, Umeå, 25–28 Aug 2008. 259(4) (February 5), 762–769. doi: 10.1016/j.foreco.2009.09.025.
  24. Swarbrick, J. T., Willson, B. W., & Hannan-Jones, M. A. (1998). Lantana camara L. In F. D. Panetta, R. H. Groves, & R. C. H. Shepherd (Eds.), The biology of Australian weeds (pp. 119–136). Melbourne: R.G. & F.J. Richardson.Google Scholar
  25. Thaman, R. R. (1974). Lantana camara: Its introduction, dispersal and impact on islands of the tropical Pacific Ocean. Journal of the University of Guam, 10, 17–39.Google Scholar
  26. Thekaekara, M. (2009). Honey is life. The New Internationalist. http://www.newint.org/features/2009/09/01/tribal-peoples. Accessed 1 Oct 2012.
  27. Thekaekara, T. (2010). Dissecting the ‘human’ in human-wildlife conflict. M.Sc. thesis, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
  28. Thornton, T. F. (2008). Being and place among the Tlingit. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
  29. Thornton, T. F., et al. (n.d.). Human adaptation to biodiversity change: Rethinking pathways, synergies, and solutions. Manuscript in the author’s possession. Oxford: Environmental Change Institute, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
  30. Thornton, T. F., & Manasfi, N. (2010). Adaptation, genuine and spurious: Demystifying adaptation processes in relation to climate change. Environment and Society Advances in Research, 1, 132–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Thurston, E. (1909). Castes and tribes of Southern India. Madras: Government Press.Google Scholar
  32. Tireman, H. (1916). Lantana in the forests of Coorg. Indian Forester, XLII, 387–392.Google Scholar
  33. Turnbull, C. M. (1965). The Mbuti Pygmies: An ethnographic survey (Anthropological papers of the American Museum of Natural History, Vol. 50). New York: American Museum of Natural History.Google Scholar
  34. Turner, V. W. (1969). The ritual process: Structure and anti-structure. Chicago: Aldine Pub.Google Scholar
  35. Zvelebil, K. V. (1982). Jēnu Ku umba: Brief report on a ‘Tribal’ language of the Nilgiri Area. Journal of the American Oriental Society, 108(2), 297–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tarsh Thekaekara
    • 1
  • Nishita Vasanth
    • 1
  • Thomas F. Thornton
    • 2
  1. 1.The Shola TrustGudalur, NilgirisIndia
  2. 2.Oxford’s School of Geography and the Environment and Environmental Change InstituteOxfordUK

Personalised recommendations