Monitoring of High-Risk Areas: Burn Units



Burns are one of the most common and devastating forms of trauma. Globally WHO estimates burn-related deaths to be 195,000 annually, and almost half occur in the Southeast Asia Region. In India, over 6–7 million people sustain moderate or severe burns per year. In 2008, over 410,000 burn injuries occurred in the United States of America, with approximately 40,000 requiring hospitalization [1]. Infection and sepsis are among the leading causes of mortality in burns, responsible for 75 % of all deaths [2]. Prevention and control of infections in burn patient is a challenge as several characteristics of burn patients (Table 16.1) make them particularly susceptible to infection; the environment in burn units (BUs) can become contaminated; and these organisms can be easily transmitted. Thus, BU can be a site of explosive and prolonged outbreaks caused by resistant organisms.


Resistant Organism Total Body Surface Area Surveillance Culture Infection Control Practice National Nosocomial Infection Surveillance 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
  2. 2.
    Taneja N, Emmanuel R, Chari PS, Sharma M. A prospective study of hospital-acquired infections in burn patients at a tertiary care referral centre in North India. Burns. 2004;30(7):665–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mayhall CG. The epidemiology of burn wound infections: then and now. Clin Infect Dis. 2003;37(4):543–50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Shankowsky HA, Callioux LS, Tredget EE. North American survey of hydrotherapy in modern burn care. J Burn Care Rehabil. 1994;15:143–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Steven EW, Basil AP, Seung HK. Infections in burns. In: Cunha BA, editor. Infectious diseases in critical care medicine. 2nd ed. New York: Informa Healthcare USA; 2007. p. 507–25.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Weber JM, Neely AN, Mayhall CG. Burns. In: Carrico R, editor. APIC text of infection control and epidemiology. 3rd ed. Washington, DC: APIC; 2009.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Dudeck MA, Horan TC, Peterson KD, Allen-Bridson K, Morrell GC, Pollock DA, Edwards JR. National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN) report, data summary for 2009, device-associated module. Am J Infect Control. 2011;39(5):349–67.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Steer JA, Papini RP, Wilson AP, McGrouther DA, Parkhouse N. Quantitative microbiology in the management of burn patients. Correlation between quantitative and qualitative burn wound biopsy culture and surface alginate swab culture. Burns. 1996;22:173–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Pruitt Jr BA, McManus AT, Kim SH, Goodwin CW. Burn wound infections: current status. World J Surg. 1998;22:135–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    de la Cal MA, Cerdá E, García-Hierro P, van Saene HK, Gómez-Santos D, Negro E, Lorente JA. Survival benefit in critically ill burned patients receiving decontamination of the digestive tract: a randomized placebo-controlled, double-blind trial. Ann Surg. 2005;241:424–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Barret JP, Jeschke MG, Herndon DN. Selective decontamination of the digestive tract in severely burned pediatric patients. Burns. 2001;27:439–45.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mozingo DW, McManus AT, Pruitt BA. Infections of burn wounds. In: Jarvis WR, editor. Bennett & Brachman’s Hospital Infections. 5th ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; 2007. p. 599–610.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MicrobiologyVMMC and Safdarjung HospitalNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations