Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 236))

Abstract

Many modeling studies that aimed at providing an accurate relationship between the software project effort (or cost) and the involved cost drivers have been conducted for effective management of software projects. However, the derived models are only applicable for a specific project and its variables. In this chapter, we present the use of back-propagation neural network (NN) to model the software development (SD) effort of 18 SD NASA projects based on six cost drivers. The performance of the NN model was also compared with a multi-regression model and other models available in the literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Shukla, R. Misra, A.K.: Estimating software maintenance effort - a neural network approach. 1st India, Software Engineering Conference. 107–112 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jorgensen, M.: A review of studies on expert estimation of software development effort. J Syst. Software. 70(1–2), 37–60 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Jorgensen, M., Shepperd, M.: A systematic review of software development cost estimation studies. IEEE T. Software Eng. 33(1), 33–53 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Verner, J.M., Evanco, W.M., Cerpa, N.: State of the practice: an exploratory analysis of schedule estimation and software project success prediction. Inform. Software Tech. 49(2), 181–193 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jorgensen, M., Ostvold, K.M.: Reasons for software effort estimation error: impact of respondent role, information collection approach, and data analysis method. IEEE T. Software Eng. 30(12), 993–1007 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Huang, X., Ho, D., Ren, J., Capretz, L.F.: A soft computing framework for software effort estimation. Soft Comput. 10, 170–177 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tronto, I.F.B., Silva, J.D.S., Anna, N.S.: An investigation of artificial neural networks based prediction systems in software project management. J Syst. Software. 81(3), 356–367 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kumar, K.V., Ravi, V., Carr, M., Kiran, N.R.: Software development cost estimation using wavelet neural networks. J Syst. Software. 81(11), 1853–1860 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Sheta, A.: Estimation of the COCOMO model parameters using genetic algorithms for NASA software projects. J. Comput. Sci. 2(2), 118–123 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Xu, Z.W., Khoshgoftaar, T.M.: Identification of fuzzy models of software cost estimation. Fuzzy Set. Syst. 145(1), 141–163 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Ahmed, M., Saliu, M.O., Alghamdi, J.: Adaptive fuzzy logic-based framework for software development effort prediction. Inform. Software Tech. 47(1), 31–48 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kazemifard, M., Zaeri, A., Ghasem-Aghaee, N., Nematbakhsh, M.A., Mardukhi, F.: Fuzzy emotional COCOMO II software cost estimation (FECSCE) using multi-agent systems. Appl. Soft Comput. 11(2), 2260–2270 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Shukla, K.K.: Neuro-genetic prediction of software development effort. Inform. Software Tech. 42, 701–713 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Huang, S.J., Chiu, N.H.: Optimization of analogy weights by genetic algorithm for software effort estimation. Inform. Software Tech. 48, 1034–1045 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sheta, A. F., Al-Afeef, A.: A GP effort estimation model utilizing line of code and methodology for NASA software projects. 10th International Conference on Intelligent Systems Design and Applications. 290–295 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jorgensen, M.: Regression models of software development effort estimation accuracy and bias. Empir. Softw. Eng. 9, 297–314 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Shukla, R., Misra, A.K.: Software maintenance effort estimation-neural network vs regression modeling approach. Int. J. Comput. Applic. 1(29), 83–89 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bailey, J.W., Basili, V.R.: A metamodel for software development resource expenditures. 5th IEEE International Conference on, Software Engineering. 107–116 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  19. www.minitab.com (2012).

  20. www.mathworks.com/access/helpdesk/help/pdf_doc/nnet/nnet.pdf (2012).

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the financial support extended by the Faulty of Engineering and Built Environment, University of Johannesburg.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ruchi Shukla .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer India

About this paper

Cite this paper

Shukla, R., Shukla, M., Marwala, T. (2014). Neural Network and Statistical Modeling of Software Development Effort. In: Babu, B., et al. Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Soft Computing for Problem Solving (SocProS 2012), December 28-30, 2012. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 236. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1602-5_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1602-5_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi

  • Print ISBN: 978-81-322-1601-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-81-322-1602-5

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics