Lines of Siege: The Contested Government of Nature



Michel Foucault’s archaeology of modern forms of power is deeply embedded in the understanding that space is not a passive support structure of social and economic relations but the very medium of politics. This text traces the articulations between power/knowledge formations and territorial, urban and architectural arrangements, further arguing that Foucault’s definition of biopolitics must be located in relation to an ‘ecological diagram’ inside which nature appears as a fundamental locus of modes of subjugation and resistance. In the second part I draw on my current research at the frontiers of Amazonia in order to probe these theoretical insights, tracing the lines that are currently being drawn between sovereignty and nature, government and environment, politics and ecology as they unfold in the spatial conflicts of today.


Indigenous People Private Property Chicago School State Repression State Terror 



 The author would like to thank CAPES, Minister of Culture of Brazil, for the kind support to this research.


  1. Agamben, G. (1998). Homo sacer. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. AmazonWatch. (2009). Day 50 of indigenous protests in Peru, 28 May 2013, Accessed 26 June 2013.
  3. Amnesty International. (2009). Peru: Baguá six months on: ‘Just because we think and speak differently, they are doing this injustice to us’, 2 Dec 2009. London, AMR 46/017/2009. Accessed 26 June 2013.
  4. APRODEH. (2008). La criminalización de la protesta en el gobierno de Alan Garcia, Serios peligros para los derechos humanos. Lima: APRODEH.Google Scholar
  5. Arce, L. (2009). Peru: Massive protests against García government over Amazon massacre. World socialist web site, 13 June 2009. Accessed 26 June 2013.
  6. Canguilhem, G. (1980 [1952]). Le vivant et son milieu. In La connaissance de la vie, Paris: J. Vrin, translated into English by Graham Burchell as The living being and its environment (milieu). Accessed 26 June 2013.
  7. CNA Analysis and Solutions. (2007). National security and threat of climate change. Accessed 1 July 2013.
  8. Cobain, I. (2009). British mining company faces damages claim after allegations of torture in Peru. The Guardian, 18 Oct 2009. Accessed 26 June 2013.
  9. Crutzen, P., & Stoerner, E. (2000). The Anthropocene, IGBP [International Geosphere-Biosphere Programme] Newsletter 41.Google Scholar
  10. Cullather, N. (2010). The hungry world. Harvard: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  11. DARN (Derechos, Ambiente e RecursosNaturales). (2009). Hechos y AspectosVulneratorios de Los DecretosLegislativos 1090 y 1064, June.Google Scholar
  12. de Soto, H. (1989). The other path: The economic answer to terrorism. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  13. Ehrlich, P. R. (1968). The population bomb. New York: Buccaneer Books.Google Scholar
  14. Foucault, M. (1990). The history of sexuality (Vol. 1). New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar
  15. Foucault, M. (2001). Madness and civilization; a history of insanity in the age of reason. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Foucault, M. (2003). Society must be defended. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  17. Foucault, M. (2004). The birth of biopolitics. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  18. Foucault, M. (2007). Security, territory, population, lecture one: 11 January 1978. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  19. Grandin, G. (2004). The last colonial massacre. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Grove, R. H. (1995). Green imperialism: Colonial expansion, tropical island edens and the origins of environmentalism 1600–1860. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Holdridge, L. R. (1947). Determination of world plant formations from simple climatic data. Science, 105(2727), 367–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Holdridge, L. R. (1967). Life zone ecology. San José: Tropical Science Center.Google Scholar
  23. Klein, N. (2007). The shock doctrine: The rise of disaster capitalism. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  24. Le Maître, A. (1682). La metropolitée. Amsterdam: Chés Balthes Boekholt pour Jean van Gorp.Google Scholar
  25. Linebaugh, P. (2008). The Magna Carta manifesto: Liberties and commons for all. Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  26. Luke, T. W. (1995). On environmentality: Geo-power and eco-knowledge in the discourse of contemporary environmentalism. Cultural Critique, 31. The politics of systems and environments, Part II (Autumn), 57–81.
  27. Luke, T. W. (1996). Generating green governmentality: A cultural critique of environmental studies as a power/knowledge formation. Available at: Last Accessed 26 June 2013.
  28. Luke, T. W. (1999). Ecocritique in context: Technology, democracy and capitalism as environment. Available at: Last Accessed 26 June 2013.
  29. Macdonald, T. (2005). State of the world’s minorities 2006 – Latin America: Indigenous peoples. London: Minority Rights Group International.Google Scholar
  30. Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., & Behrens, W. W., III. (1972). The limits to growth. New York: New American Library.Google Scholar
  31. Moran, R. E. (2001). An alternative look at a proposed mine. In Tambogrande. Peru: Oxfam America.Google Scholar
  32. National Intelligence Council. (2004). Mapping the global future: A report of the national intelligence council’s 2020 project. Pittsburgh: NIC.
  33. Negri, A., & Hardt, M. (2004). Multitude: War and democracy in the age of empire. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  34. ODECOFROC. (2010). Peru: A chronicle of deception. Copenhagen: International Work Group for Indigenous Affairs (IWGIA).Google Scholar
  35. ONERN. (1976). Mapa Ecologico del Peru. Lima: ONERN.Google Scholar
  36. ONERN. (1981). Mapa de Capacidad de Uso Mayor de Las Tierras del Peru. Lima: ONERN.Google Scholar
  37. Oxfam. (2008). Análises de la conformidadconstitucional del uso de lasfaculdadeslegislativasotorgadaspor el congreso al podeEecutivomediante la Ley no. 29157, Lima.Google Scholar
  38. Oxfam. (2009). Mining conflicts in Peru: Condition critical. London: Oxfam. Available at:
  39. Pemberton, M. (2009). Military vs. climate security: Mapping the shift from the Bush years to the Obama era. Washington, D.C.: Foreign Policy in Focus.Google Scholar
  40. Persons, J. J. (1962). Review of Mapa Ecológico do Peru. Economic Geography, 38(3), 278–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Peruvian Times. (2009). Amazon update: Peru government declares state of emergency in 9 eastern districts, 9 May 2009. Accessed 26 June 2013.
  42. Poole, D., & Rénique, G. (1992). Peru: Time of fear. London: Latin American Bureau.Google Scholar
  43. Rabinow, R. (1995). French modern: Norms and forms of the social environment. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  44. Rostow, W. (1960). The stages of economic growth: A non-communist manifesto. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Streeter, S. M. (2000). Managing the counterrevolution: The United States and Guatemala, 1954–1961. Athens: Ohio University Centre for International Studies.Google Scholar
  46. Tosi, J. A. (1958). Zonas de Vida Natural en el Peru, with an appendix by L. R. Holdridge. Lima: Instituto Interamericano de Ciencias Agricolas de la OEA.Google Scholar
  47. Tosi, J. A. (1969). Mapa Ecologico del Peru (three sheets – in colour 1:1,000,000), IRENA.Google Scholar
  48. UNEP. (2013). Sudan: Post-conflict environmental assessment. Available at: Accessed 1 July 2013.
  49. Walsh, C. (2009). O interculturalizarda nova Constituiçãoequatoriana. Revista de Doutrina, nº 31, (Brazil), August.Google Scholar
  50. Webb, T. (2011). UK firm’s partner wanted Peru to curb priests in mine conflict areas. The Guardian, 31 Jan 2011. Accessed 26 June 2013.
  51. World Rain Forest Movement Bulletin. (2009). Peru: Amazon peoples, bastions of resistance, Bulletin No. 142, May. Accessed 1 July 2013.
  52. Zibechi, R. (2009). Masacre en La Amazonia: la Guerra por los bienes communes., 12 June 2009. Available at: Accessed 26 June 2013.
  53. Zimmerer, K. S. (2011). Vertical environment. In J. Dym & K. Offen (Eds.), Mapping Latin America: A cartographic reader (pp. 263–268). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Pontificia Universidad Católica de Ecuador – Facultad de Arquitectura, Diseño y ArteQuitoEcuador

Personalised recommendations