Skip to main content

Biopolitics and Urban Governmentality in Mumbai

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Biopolitics of Development

Abstract

Everyday spaces for urban poor, informal workers and less privileged minority communities in the city of Mumbai portray that right to the city is differentially constituted for different people and communities. The chapter employs Foucault’s notions of governmentality and biopolitics to elucidate the complex manner in which the government and affluent sections of the society ensure that the urban poor continue to provide services for them amidst persistent insecurity, informality and anxiety. The chapter draws from three different, yet interlinked, cases mentioned above to establish and demonstrate the exercise of biopower in governing the city of Mumbai and its people. It explains the use of biopolitical strategies, such as statistical enquiries, censuses and programmes for enhancement or curtailment of benefits and services through which social lives get regulated, disciplined and marginalized.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Chawls are multi-storeyed one-room tenements created initially for the habitation of the working class population in Mumbai.

  2. 2.

    The Mumbai Metropolitan Region Development Authority (MMRDA) is an apex body for the planning and coordination of development activities in Mumbai region.

  3. 3.

    Sedentarization is the process of settling the nomadic population. James Scott in his book, ‘Seeing Like a State’ (1998), elaborated upon the desire of the state to know more about its subjects and therefore make attempts to settle subjects and make them legible.

  4. 4.

    The cards issued for ensuring people’s entitlement for subsidized food procurement under the public distribution system (PDS).

  5. 5.

    Foucault explains pastoral power in the following way: first, it was exercised over a flock of people on the move rather than over a static territory; second, it was a fundamentally beneficent power according to which the duty of the pastor (to the point of self-sacrifice) was the salvation of the flock; and finally, it was an individualizing power, in that the pastor must care for each and every member of the flock singly. Using the metaphor of pastoral power, Foucault explains the strategies of government vis-à-vis the conduct of population.

  6. 6.

    P. Chidambaram, the then Home Minister, blamed migrants for rising crimes in Delhi (DNA 2010).

  7. 7.

    Sheila Dikshit, Chief Minister of Delhi, blamed migrants for increasing crime against women in Delhi (India Today 2012).

  8. 8.

    CW No 267 and CM 464 of 1993, Delhi High Court.

  9. 9.

    Almitra H. Patel & Anr. Vs Union of India: (2000) 2 SSC 679.

  10. 10.

    Agamben (1998) differentiates bare life from qualified life of political citizens. Bare life is excluded from the higher aims of the state, yet is a subject of political control.

  11. 11.

    A nationwide sample survey called the National Sample Survey was initiated by the Government of India in the Department of Economic Affairs, Ministry of Finance, in 1950 to collect statistical sampling comprehensive socioeconomic data relating to different sector of the economy of the country. The National Sample Survey is a continuing multi-subject integrated survey conducted in the form of successive rounds, each round covering some topic of current interest. Currently, the survey is conducted by the National Sample Survey Office (NSSO) in the Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation of the Government of India.

  12. 12.

    The Prime Minister of India in 2005 commissioned a High Level Committee under the Chairmanship of Justice Rajinder Sachar (retired) to prepare a report on the social, economic and educational condition of the Muslim community of India. The report is first of its kind revealing the backwardness of Indian Muslims. The report, widely known as Sachar Committee Report, has led to policy initiatives to address educational and occupational backwardness of the community since the report has been publicized.

  13. 13.

    Mumbra is a small town approximately 40 km from Mumbai and falls under the neighbouring Thane Municipal Corporation. The high concentration of Muslims in this area is heavily influenced by the movement of a large number of Muslims from different locations in Mumbai during the 1992–1993 communal riots in the city.

  14. 14.

    Study conducted by Shajahan between 2006 and 2009 on communal expressions and secular engagements in Mumbai and Thane.

  15. 15.

    Enterprises that are not registered with appropriate authorities and do not possess proper licences.

  16. 16.

    Foucault (1984) refers to heterotopia in contrast to utopia as a real space, which is simultaneously mythic and real. Foucault provides two categories of heterotopias such as heterotopia of crisis and deviation, respectively. The first refers to sacred and forbidden places and the second refers to places where people are placed when they do not conform to the norm. The author here tries to explain the neglected space of Muslim settlements as a heterotopia of deviation.

  17. 17.

    Large-scale violent riots broke out in the city of Mumbai following the demolition of a 400-year-old mosque in Ayodhya, called the Babri Masjid, in the northern state of Uttar Pradesh on 6 December 1992 by Hindu fundamentalist groups. The demolition was followed by widespread celebration of the event by Hindu nationalist groups and right-wing political parties such as the Shiv Sena and resultant responses from the Muslim community led to massive and targeted killings of Muslims apparently under the connivance of the state machinery, as reported by Justice B.N. Srikrishna Commission of Inquiry.

  18. 18.

    Mandals are collectives (usually unregistered and informal), in communities mostly formed for celebrating Hindu festivals.

  19. 19.

    Foucault in an interview conducted by a round table of historians (Foucault 1977) defines dispositif as a heterogeneous ensemble consisting of discourses, institutions, architectural forms, regulatory decisions, laws, administrative measures, scientific statements and philosophical, moral and philanthropic propositions. Such are the elements of the apparatus. The apparatus itself is the system of relations that can be established between these elements (see also Foucault ibid).

  20. 20.

    Having a name in the books refers to the entry in the records at the police station about minor or petty offences against anybody in the locality.

  21. 21.

    Report of Solid Waste Management in Class I Cities in India. This eight-member committee was set up by the Supreme Court of India in 1998. It comprised senior bureaucrats and other experts; there was no representation of labour. Among the key recommendations in the report was that solid waste management in cities would improve with privatization.

  22. 22.

    The article refers to the zero garbage targets that the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation (BMC) had set for itself for 3 months beginning from 1 October 2011. The collection of garbage improved only marginally since the drive. The article mentions the quantum collected and not the amount generated each day. With the collection not being 100 %, the figures that we have mentioned are at best estimates.

  23. 23.

    Standard and non-standard workers are broad categories of workers; the terms are also used interchangeably with formal and informal workers, respectively. The former are those who have job security and employment-based social security, while the latter category of workers, employed on contractual basis or on a casual (including daily wage) basis, are in precarious employment. In India, with more than 92 % of the workforce in the informal economy – as wage earners or self employed – the absence of work and of employment-based social security is responsible for an uneven and conflictual relationship of these citizens with the state.

  24. 24.

    Article 341 of the Constitution of India provides for the public notification and listing of castes, races or tribes or parts/groups within them to be deemed as Scheduled Castes in relation to that State or Union Territory.

References

  • Agamben, G. (1998). Homo sacer: Sovereign power and bare life. California: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agamben, G. (2002). Means without end. Minneapolis: University of Minneapolis Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxstrom. (2000). ‘Governmentality, bio-power and the emergence of the Malayan-Tamil subjects on the plantations of colonial Malaya’. Crossroads: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Southeast Asian Studies, 14(2), 49–78, Accessed 6 Sept 2011 10:17

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhan, G. (2009). ‘This is no longer the city I once knew’. Evictions, the urban poor and the right to the city in millennial Delhi. Environment and Urbanization, 21(1), 127–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burra, S. (2005). Towards a pro-poor framework for slum upgrading in Mumbai, India. Environment and Urbanization, 17(1), 67–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Das, P. K. (2003). Slums improvement and development schemes & policies. http://www.pkdas.com/pdfs/Nationalconsultation-Slums.pdf. Accessed 28 Jun 2013.

  • DNA (2010). P. Chidambaram blames migrants for crimes in Delhi, triggers reaction, December 13. http://www.dnaindia.com/india/report_p-chidambaram-blames-migrants-for-crimes-in-delhi-triggers-reaction_1480629. Accessed 4 Sept 2012.

  • Fassin, D. (2001). The biopolitics of otherness. Anthropology Today, 17(1), 3–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1977). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977. New York: Pantheon Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1984). Of other spaces: Utopias and heterotopias. Architecture, Mouvement, Continuité, Vol. 5, 46–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1990). The history of sexuality: An introduction (Vol. 1). New York: Vintage. Originally published 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 102–103). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N. (1992). Rethinking the public sphere. In C. Calhon (Ed.), Habermas and the public sphere (pp. 109–142). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of India. (1999). Solid waste management in Class 1 cities. Report of the committee constituted by the Hon. Supreme Court of India. Available at http://www.karmayog.com/cleanliness/swmcc.htm

  • Harriss, J. (2007). Antinomies of empowerment: Observations of civil society, politics and urban governance in India. Economic and Political Weekly, June 30, 2716–2724.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hindustan Times (2012). Uddhav Thackeray, Shiv Sena leader, wants permit system for migrant Biharis in Mumbai, Mumbai, 4 Sept 2012. http://www.hindustantimes.com/India-news/Mumbai/Uddhav-wants-permit-system-for-Biharis-in-Mumbai/Article1-924181.aspx. Accessed 4 Sept 2012.

  • India Today. (2012). Migrants to blame for rapes: Sheila Dikshit, 12 Apr 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jha, M. K. (2011). Place of poor in urban space. Policies and Practice. No 39. Kolkata: Calcutta Research Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jha, M. K. (2013). The idea of identity card(s) and experiences of subaltern Mumbai. In Atig Ghosh (Ed.), Branding the migrant. Kolkata: Frontpage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jha, M. K., & Shajahan, P. K. (2010). Social topography of delineated others: Muslims in contemporary India. In A. Waheed (Ed.), Minority education in India (pp. 3–19). New Delhi: SERIALS Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kohn, M. (2001). The power of place: The house of people as counterpublic. Polity, 33(4), 503–526.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, A. (2005). Mumbai’s expendable poor. Economic and Political Weekly, 5 Feb, 506–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazzarato, M. (2002). From biopower to biopolitics. Pli: The Warwick Journal of Philosophy, 13, 99–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, H. (1996). Writings on cities. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lemke, T. (2000). Foucault, governmentality and critique. Paper presented at the rethinking Marxism conference, University of Amherst (MA), 21–24 Sept 2000. Retrieved from J Stor.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuwirth, R. (2005). Shadow cities: A billion squatters, a new urban world. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neyazi, T. A. (2007). State, citizenship and religious community: The case of Indian Muslim women. Asian Journal of Political Science, 15(3), 303–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robinson, J. (2002). Global and world cities: A view from off the map. International of Urban and Regional Research, 26(3), 439–653.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (2006). Governing “advanced” liberal democracies. In A. Sharma & A. Gupta (Eds.), The anthropology of the state (pp. 144–162). Malden: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roy, A. (2004). Transnational trespassing: The geopolitics of urban informality. In A. Roy & N. Al-Sayyad (Eds.), Urban informality: Transnational perspectives from the Middle East, Latin America and South Asia. Lanham: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, J. (1998). Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human conditions have failed. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen, S. (2011). Trash collection up, but zero garbage still a dream. Times of India, Mumbai. 5 Nov 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shajahan, P. K. (2009). Demons proselytizers and liquid fear: Communal expressions in contemporary India. In S. Sharma & M. K. Jha (Eds.), Opposition to silence (pp. 169–184). New Delhi: Alter Note Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma, R. N., Vyas, M., Jha, M., & Shaban, A. (2008). Impact assessment of resettlement implementation under Mumbai Urban Transport Project (MUTP). Mumbai: Tata Institute of Social Sciences.

    Google Scholar 

  • The Hindu (2012). ‘Following protests from the Bihar government after an alleged Azad Maidan rioter was picked up from that State, Maharashtra Navnirman Sena chief Raj Thackeray has threatened to brand every migrant from Bihar an “infiltrator”’, 31 Aug 2012. http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/article3845043.ece. Accessed 5 Sept 2012.

  • Vyas, M. (2009). Unionization as a strategy in community organization in the context of privatization: The case of conservancy workers in Mumbai. Community Development Journal, 44(3), 320–335.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manish K. Jha .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer India

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jha, M.K., Shajahan, P.K., Vyas, M. (2013). Biopolitics and Urban Governmentality in Mumbai. In: Mezzadra, S., Reid, J., Samaddar, R. (eds) The Biopolitics of Development. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1596-7_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics