Advertisement

Women, Work and Exploitation: A Binary Perspective

  • Zakir HusainEmail author
  • Mousumi Dutta
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Sociology book series (BRIEFSSOCY)

Abstract

In developing countries, policy makers commonly argue that involving women in paid economic activities is possibly the ‘best’ way of integrating women in development. This argument ignores the fact that the relations through which women are incorporated into the development process is crucial to understanding whether women’s ability to shape and share values in the community is enhanced or inhibited. Pioneering empirical studies by Marxist researchers bring out this point, and are reviewed in this chapter to show how capitalism and patriarchy are interlinked and perpetually reinforce each other to subordinate women workers.

Keywords

Capitalism Patriarchy Export-based industries 

References

  1. Arizpe, L., & Arande, J. (1981). The comparative advantages of women’s disadvantages: Women workers in the strawberry export agribusiness in Mexico. Signs, 7, 455–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Badgett, M., Lee, V., & Folbre, N. (2001). Gender norms and economic outcomes. In M. F. Loutfi (Ed.), Women, gender and work: What is equality, and how do we get there? (pp. 327–341). Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
  3. Banerjee, N. (1985). Women workers in the unorganized sector: The Calcutta experience. Hyderabad: Sangam Books Pvt Ltd.Google Scholar
  4. Banerjee, N. (1991). Indian women in a changing industrial scenario. New Delhi: Sage Publishers.Google Scholar
  5. Banerjee, N. (1992). Poverty, work and gender in urban India. (Occasional Paper No. 133). Kolkata: Centre for Studies in Social Sciences.Google Scholar
  6. Barajas, E., Maria del Rosío, & Yalán, M. S. (1995). Rotación de personal en la industria maquiladora de Tijuana: Mujeres y condiciónes de vida. In S. Gonzalvez, O. Ruiz & O. Woo (Eds.), Mujeres, migracion y maquila en la frontera norte. Tinjuana: El Colegio de la Frontera Norte.Google Scholar
  7. Bell, D. (1981). Women’s business is hard work: Central Australian aboriginal women’s love rituals. Signs, 7(2), 314–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brannon, J. T., & Lucker, G. W. (1990). The impact of Mexico’s economic crisis on the demographic composition of the maquiladora labour force. Journal of Borderland Studies, 4, 39–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Braunstein, E., & Folbre N. (1999). To honour or obey: Efficiency, equity and patriarchal property rights. Unpublished manuscript. Armherst, MA: Department of Economics, University of Massachusets.Google Scholar
  10. Braverman, H. (1974). Labour and monopoly capital. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
  11. Carnoy, M. (2001). The family, flexible work and social cohesion at risk. In: M. F. Loutfi (Ed.), Women, Gender and Work: What is equality, and how do we get there? (pp. 305–325). Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
  12. Centre for Organization Development. (2004). Final report on women in information technology. Report submitted to Department of Women and Child, Ministry of Human Resource Development, Government of India, Hyderabad.Google Scholar
  13. Clarke, A., & Sekher, T. V. (2007). Can career-minded young women reverse gender discrimination? A view from Bangalore’s high tech sector. Gender, Technology and Development, 11(3), 285–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cooper, Cary, & Davidson, Marilyn. (1982). High pressure: Working lives of women managers. London: Walter Fontana.Google Scholar
  15. Coyle, A. (1989). Women in management: A suitable case for treatment? Feminist Review, 31(Spring), 117–125.Google Scholar
  16. Crouter, A. C. (1984). Spillover from family to work: The neglected side of the work-family interface. Human Relations, 37(6), 425–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dilworth, J. E. L. (2004). Predictors of negative spillover from family to work. Journal of Family Issues, 3(25), 241–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Elson, D., & Pearson, R. (1981). Nimble fingers make cheap workers: An analysis of women’s employment in third world export manufacturing, Feminist Review, 7(Spring), 87–107.Google Scholar
  19. England, P., & Folbre, N. (1999). The costs of caring. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 561, 39–51.Google Scholar
  20. Fernandez Kelley, M. P. (1981). Development and the sexual division of labour. Signs, 7(2), 268–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fernandez Kelley, M. P. (1983). For we are sold, I and my people: Women and industry in Mexico’s frontier. Albany: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  22. Folbre, N. (1994). Who pays for the kids? Gender and the structures of constraint. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Folbre, N., & Weisskopf, T. E. (1998). Did Father know best? Families, markets and the supply of caring labor. In A. Ben-Ner & L. Putterman (Eds.), Economics, values and organization (pp. 171–205). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Frobel, F., Heinrich, J., & Kreye, O. (1979). The new international division of labour. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Fussel, E. (2000). Making labour flexible: The recomposition of Tijuana’s maquiladora female labour force. Feminist Economics, 6(3), 59–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gaio, F. J. (1995). Women in software programming: the experience of Brazil. In S. Mitter & S. Rowbotham (Eds.), Women encounter technology: Changing patterns of employment in the third world (pp. 205–232). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  27. Greenhaus, J. H., & Beutell, N. J. (1985). Sources of conflict between work and family roles. The Academy of Management Review, 10(1), 76–88.Google Scholar
  28. Grossman, R. (1979) Women’s place in the integrated circuit. Southeast Asia chronicle and Pacific review (joint issue), 66/9(5), 2–17.Google Scholar
  29. International Labour Organization. (2004). Breaking through the glass ceiling: Women in management, 2004 update. Geneva: International Labour Organization.Google Scholar
  30. Jain, D., & Banerjee, N. (Eds.) (1985). Tyranny of the household. Shakti Books, Delhi.Google Scholar
  31. Jones, G. (2007). Delayed marriage and very low fertility in Pacific Asia, Population Development Review, 33(3), 453–478.Google Scholar
  32. Joshi, H. (1990). The cash opportunity cost of childbearing: An approach to estimation using British evidence. Population Studies, 44(1), 161–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Joshi, H. (1998). The opportunity costs of childbearing: More than mothers’ business. Journal of Population Economics, 11(2), 41–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Kelkar, G., & Nathan, D. (2002). Gender relations and technological change in Asia. Current Sociology, 50(3), 427–441.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Koggel, C. M. (2003). Globalization and women’s paid work: Expanding freedom? Feminist Economics, 9(2–3), 163–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lee, Y.-J. (2006). Risk factors in the rapidly rising incidence of divorce in Korea, Asian Population Studies, 2(2), 113–131.Google Scholar
  37. Lim, L. Y. C. (1978) Women workers in multinational corporations: The case of the electronics industry in Malaysia and Singapore. Michigan Occasional Paper No. 9, Women Studies Program. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan. Google Scholar
  38. Marx, K. (1976). Capital (Vol. I). Hammondsworth: Penguin Books.Google Scholar
  39. Mies, M. (1980). Indian women and patriarchy. New Delhi: Concept Publishing House.Google Scholar
  40. Mies, M. (1986). Patriarchy and accumulation on a world scale. Zed Press: London.Google Scholar
  41. Mitter, S. (1995). Information technology and working women’s demand. In S. Mitter & S. Rowbotham (Eds.), Women encounter technology: changing patterns of employment in the third world (pp. 19–43). New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mitter, S., & Rowbotham, S. (Eds.). (1995). Women encounter technology: Changing patterns of employment in the third world. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  43. NASSCOM and Deloitte. (2008). Indian IT/ITES industry: Impacting Indian economy and society 2007–2008. New Delhi: NASSCOM.Google Scholar
  44. Phillips, A., & Taylor, B. (1980). Sex and skill: Notes towards a feminist economics. Feminist Review, 6, 79–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pleck, J. H. (1977). The work-family role system. Social Problems, 24, 417–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Poonacha, V., & Rajan, P. (1996). Women, telework and development, In Sasikumar and Ramani (Eds.), Workshop Report: Telework and Development, Mumbai: NCST.Google Scholar
  47. Ramsey, N. & McCorduck, P. (2005). Where are the Women in Information Technology?. Report prepared by Anita Borg. Boulder: Institute for Women and Technology for National Center for and Information Technology, University of Colarado.Google Scholar
  48. Rothboeck, S., Vijaybhaskar, M., & Gayatri, V. (2001). Labor in the Indian economy: The case of the Indian software labour market. New Delhi: ILO.Google Scholar
  49. Safa, H. (1981). Runaway shops and female employment. Signs, 7(2), 418–433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schwartz, Felice N. (1989). Management women and the new facts of life. Harvard Business Journal, 67(1), 65–76.Google Scholar
  51. Sen, A. K. (1999). Development as freedom. New York: Anchor Books.Google Scholar
  52. Shanker, D. (2008). Gender relations in IT companies. Gender, Technology and Development, 12(2), 185–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sharpston, M. (1976). International subcontracting. World Development, 4(4), 333–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Shy, O. (1995). Industrial organization. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  55. Sklair, L. (1993). Assembling for development: The maquila industry in Mexico and the United States (2nd ed.). San Diego, CA: Centre for US-Mexico studies, University of California.Google Scholar
  56. Sokoloff, N. (1980). Between money and love. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  57. Soriyan, B., & Aina, B. (1991). Women’s work and challenges of computerisation: The Nigeria case: Understanding and overcoming bias in work and education. In I. V. Erikson, et al. (Eds.), Women, work and computerization. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
  58. Standing, G. (1999). Global feminization through flexible labour: A theme revisited, World Development, 27(3), 583–602.Google Scholar
  59. Sümer, S., Smithson, J., Maria das Dores Guerreiro, & Granlund, L. (2008) Becoming working mothers: Reconciling work and family at three particular workplaces in Norway, the UK, and Portugal. Community, Work & Family, 11(4), 365–384.Google Scholar
  60. Tiano, S. (1994). Patriarchy on the line: Labour, gender and ideology in the Mexican Maquila Industry. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Ullmann-Margalit, E. (1977). The emergence of norms. Clarendon Press: Oxford.Google Scholar
  62. Upadhya, C. (2005). Gender issues in the Indian software outsourcing industry. In A. Gurumurthy, P. J. Singh, A. Mundkur, & M. Swamy (Eds.), Gender in the information society: Emerging issues (pp. 74–84). New Delhi: UNDP-AIDP & Elsevier.Google Scholar
  63. Upadhya, C. (2007). Employment, exclusion and ‘merit’ in the Indian IT Industry. Economic & Political Weekly, pp. 1863–1868.Google Scholar
  64. Van Waas, M. (1981). The multinationals strategy for labour. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Vernon, R. (1966). International investment and international trade in the product cycle. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80(2), 190–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Waldfogel, J. (1997). The effects of children on women’s wages. American Sociological Review, 62(2), 83–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wirth, L. (2001). Breaking through the glass ceiling: Women in management. Geneva: International Labour Organization.Google Scholar
  68. Young, G. (1984). Women, development and human rights: Issues in integrated transnational production. The Journal of Applied Behavioural Science, 20(4), 383–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Young, M., & Willmott, P. (1973). The symmetrical family. London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Humanities and Social SciencesIndian Institute of Technology KharagpurKharagpurIndia
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsPresidency UniversityKolkataIndia

Personalised recommendations