Reconceptualizing the Separative Self

  • V. Hari Narayanan


The idea of the self plays a pivotal role in human life. The most common way of conceptualizing the self may be called the free-floating or separative self. This amounts to treating the self as something away from the web of life and as something in need of protection and aggrandizement. Another major characteristic of the free-floating self is the belief in free will. There have been many studies questioning the empirical validity of free will, and this takes cudgels against the free-floating self-conception also. Even though some traits associated with this kind of self-conception might have had evolutionary advantages, it is not difficult to see that the moorings of many human problems can be traced to the separative self-conception. Therefore, efforts need to be made to develop an alternate way of understanding the self. It is contended in this chapter that the conception of the free-floating self is primarily a case of gut feeling of certainty and our present environment is conducive to overcome this inveterate way of understanding ourselves.


Rubber Hand Confirmation Bias Mystical Experience Conscious Thought Unseen Hand 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Albahiri, M. (2007). Analytical Buddhism: The two-tiered illusion of self. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  2. Bohm, D. (2007). On dialogue. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Brass, M., & Haggard, P. (2007, August 22). To do or not to do: The neural signature of self-control. The Journal of Neuroscience, 27(34), 9141–9145.Google Scholar
  4. Burton, R. (2008). On being certain: Believing you are right even when you are not. New York: St. Martin’s Press.Google Scholar
  5. Damasio, A. (2010). Self comes to mind: Constructing the conscious brain. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
  6. Jaynes, J. (1976). The origin of consciousness in the breakdown of the bicameral mind. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.Google Scholar
  7. Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1999). Philosophy in the flesh. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  8. Leary, M. R. (2004). The curse of the self: Self-awareness, egotism, and the quality of human life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Libet, B. (1985). Unconscious cerebral initiative and the role of conscious will involuntary action. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 8, 529–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Metzinger, T. (2010). The ego tunnel: The science of the mind and the myth of the self. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  11. Philips, M. (2008). The undercover philosopher: A guide to detecting shams. Lies and delusions. Oxford: One World Publications.Google Scholar
  12. Wegner, D. M. (2002). The illusion of conscious will. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  13. Wegner, D. M., & Wheatley, T. (1999). Apparent mental causation: Sources of the experience of will. American Psychologist, 54(7), 480–492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Wilson, E. (1999). Consilience: The unity of knowledge. New York: Vintage Books.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Indian Institute of Technology JodhpurJodhpurIndia

Personalised recommendations