Abstract
The basic question in the long-standing debate about free will (FW) is not whether FW can be demonstrated to exist nor even whether it exists, but instead how to define it scientifically. If FW is not dismissed as an illusion nor identified with a variety of unpredictability, then logical paradoxes arise that make FW elusive to define. We resolve these paradoxes through a model of FW, in which FW is a new causal primitive empowered to override physical causality under guidance. We develop a simple mathematical realization of this model that when applied to quantum theory suggests that the exercise of FW corresponds to a non-linear positive operator-valued measure (POVM) causing deviations from the Born rule. In principle, these deviations would stand in conflict with known conservation laws and invariance principles, implying that the brain, the presumed seat of FW, may be an arena of non-standard physics. However, in practice, it will be difficult to distinguish these deviations from quantum and neural noise and statistical fluctuations. We indicate possible neurobiological and neurological tests, implications and applications of our proposed model.
aka M. N. Chetan Srinivas
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Bohm, D., & Hiley, B. (1993). The undivided universe: An ontological interpretation of quantum theory. London: Routledge.
Brecht, M., Schneider, M., Sakmann, B., & Margrie, T. W. (2004). Whisker movements evoked by stimulation of single pyramidal cells in rat motor cortex. Nature, 427, 704.
Conway, J., & Kochen, S. (2006). The free will theorem. Foundations of Physics, 36, 1441. arXiv:quant-ph/0604079.
Conway, J., & Kochen, S. (2008). The strong free will theorem. American Mathematical Society, 56, 2. arXiv:0807.3286.
Esposito, S. (2012). A personal point of view about scientific discussions on free will. Eprint arXiv:1202.3395.
Gisin, N. (2010a). The free will theorem, stochastic quantum dynamics and true becoming in relativistic quantum physics. arXiv:1002.1392.
Gisin, N. (2010b). Are there quantum effects coming from outside space-time? Nonlocality, free will and “no many-worlds”. quant-ph/1011.3440.
Hall, M. J. W. (2010). Local deterministic model of singlet state correlations based on relaxing measurement independence. Physical Review Letters, 105, 250404.
Hameroff, S., & Penrose, R. (1996). Orchestrated objective reduction of quantum coherence in brain microtubules: The “Orch OR” model for consciousness. http://www.quantumconsciousness.org/penrose-hameroff/orchOR.html.
Hodgson, D. (2001). Constraint, empowerment, and guidance: A conjectural classification of laws of nature. Philosophy, 76, 341–70. http://users.tpg.com.au/raeda/website/constraint.htm.
Hossenfelder, S. (2012). The free will function. arXiv:1202.0720.
Libet, B., Gleason, C. A., Wright, E. W., & Pearl, D. K. (1983). Time of conscious intention to act in relation to onset of cerebral activity (readiness-potential): The unconscious initiation of a freely voluntary act. Brain, 106(3), 623–642. doi:10.1093/brain/106.3.623.
Maye, A., Hsieh, C.-H., Sugihara, G., & Brembs, B. (2007). Order in spontaneous behavior. PLoS ONE, 2(5), e443. Available freely online from www.plusone.org.
Nikolič, H. (2010). Closed timelike curves, superluminal signals, and “free will” in universal quantum mechanics. arXiv:1006.0338.
O’Connor, T. (2010). Free will. http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/freewill/.
Penrose, R. (1994). Shadows of the mind. Oxford/New York: Oxford University Press.
Puryear, H. B. (1982). The Edgar Cayce Primer: Discovering the path to self-transformation. New York: Bantam Books.
Ramachandran, V., & Blakeslee, S. (1999). Phantoms in the brain. New York: Harper Perennial.
Roskies, A. (2011). Interviewed in ‘Neuroscience vs philosophy: Taking aim at free will’. Nature, 477, 23.
Srikanth, R. (2010). Entanglement, intractability and no-signaling. Physica Scripta, 81, 065002.
Srikanth, R. (2012). Srimadbhagavad Gita in the new age. http://poornaprajna.org/srik/gitopanishad.
Stapp, H. (2001). Quantum theory and the role of mind in nature. quant-ph/0805.0116.
Suarez, A. (2008). Quantum randomness can be controlled by free will – A consequence of the before-before experiment. arxiv:0804.0871.
Suarez, A. (2010a). The general free will theorem. arxiv:1006.2485.
Suarez, A. (2010b). The free will theorem and the flash ontology implicitly assume the before-before experiment and thereby imply free will. Comment on a note by Nicolas Gisin in arXiv:1002.1392v1, arxiv:1006.2485.
’t Hooft, G. (2007). The free-will postulate in quantum mechanics. quant-ph/0701097.
Timpe, K. (2006). Free will. http://www.iep.utm.edu/freewill/.
Trevena, J., & Miller, J. (2010). Brain preparation before a voluntary action: Evidence against unconscious movement initiation. Consciousness and Cognition, 19(1), 447–456. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2009.08.006.
Vedral, V. (2006). Is the universe deterministic? New Scientist, 192, 55.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer India
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Nayakar, C.S.M., Omkar, S., Srikanth, R. (2014). Consciousness, Libertarian Free Will and Quantum Randomness. In: Menon, S., Sinha, A., Sreekantan, B. (eds) Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Consciousness and the Self. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1587-5_23
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1587-5_23
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi
Print ISBN: 978-81-322-1586-8
Online ISBN: 978-81-322-1587-5
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawPhilosophy and Religion (R0)