Skip to main content

The Feel Factor: Qualia and the Affective Markers of Experience

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Brain, Self and Consciousness

Part of the book series: Studies in Neuroscience, Consciousness and Spirituality ((SNCS,volume 3))

Abstract

This chapter discusses emotions as the affective markers of experience. The bridge for social interactions is built by emotions which play the role of narrators of physical, mental, and social health for oneself and for others. When from one point of view emotions guide neural mechanisms for physiological and chemical balance, from another viewpoint emotion enhances self-expression and the presentation of the person. The study of emotion bring in the role of the brain, the body, and the self, interspersed by the influence of environment, society, art, and one’s character. In this chapter that focus on emotions I discuss the following questions: Why and for what outcome does the brain generate emotions? How are feelings and emotions different? Are feelings always dependent on sensations? Are there feelings that are not dependent on sensations? Can feelings be considered as discrete cognitive events and understood within the framework of neuroscience? Another pertinent issue that is discussed currently is the ability of emotions to be part of a decision-making process by contributing to the cognitive deciders. Do emotions influence our cognitive capacities and rational processes?

What is it that makes us human? It’s not something you can program. You can’t put it into a chip. It’s the strength of the human heart. The difference between us and the machines.

—From ‘Terminator Salvation’

As Marcus gives his heart to John Connor

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    See PHYSORG.com; http://www.physorg.com/news175417796.html; accessed on 8 June 2011.

  2. 2.

    The ‘Mary’s knowledge’ argument is a thought experiment that refutes physicalism, and states that in spite of the availability of all the objective physical facts of colour vision, the scientist Mary did not know what it was to experience colour vision until she moved to the real world from the confinement of a black-and-white room.

  3. 3.

    Nagel argues in this famous paper that subjective quality is central to consciousness.

  4. 4.

    The word ‘anesthesia’ means ‘no sensation’. ‘Synesthesia’ means ‘joined sensation’ (Greek, syn = together; aisthesis = perception). Synesthesia may also be induced by sensory deprivation, hallucinogens such as LSD and peyote, or direct electrical stimulation of subcortical limbic structures.

  5. 5.

    Phineas Gage (1823–1860) is one of the earliest documented cases of severe brain injury which led to significant findings. An accident destroyed areas of his prefrontal lobe, and consequentially led to loss of his emotional and social capacities. His rational capabilities were intact to some extent. The damage interfered with Gage’s capacity for planning and deciding a course of action. Damasio also narrates the case of Elliot who had a medical condition that affected the frontal lobe. He suffered from poor judgement and lack of insight, though he excelled in IQ tests. Patients like Gage and Elliot, though they perform well in cognitive and intelligence tests, show marked deficits in decision-making in everyday life.

  6. 6.

    See: Zajonc, R. B. (1985, April 5) Emotion and facial efference: a theory reclaimed. Science, 228(4695): 15–21.

References

  • Arbib, M. A. (1989). The metaphorical brain 2: Neural networks and beyond. New York: Wiley-Interscience.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arbib, M. A. (2002). In M. Richardson, R. J. Russell, P. Clayton, & K. Wegter-McNelly (Eds.), The horrors of humanity and the computation of the self. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Armel, K. C., & Ramachandran, V. S. (2003). Projecting sensations to external objects: Evidence from skin conductance response. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London: Biological, 270, 1499–1506.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aydin, K., Ucar, A., Oguz, K., Okur, O., Agayev, A., Unal, Z., et al. (2007). Increased gray matter density in the parietal cortex of mathematicians: A voxel-based morphometry study. American Journal of Neurobiology, 28, 1859–1864.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barkovich, A. J., Millen, K. J., & Dobyns, W. B. (2009). A developmental and genetic classification for midbrain-hindbrain malformations. Brain, 132(12), 3199–3230.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, L. F. (2004). Feelings or words? Understanding the content in self-report ratings of experienced emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 266–281.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, L. F. (2006a). Are emotions natural kinds? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 1(1), 28–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, L. F. (2006b). Solving the emotion paradox: Categorization and the experience of emotion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(1), 20–46.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, L. F., & Wager, T. D. (2006). The structure of emotion: Evidence from neuroimaging studies. Current directions in Psychological Science, 15(3), 79–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, L., Henzi, P., & Rendall, D. (2007). Social brains, simple minds: Does social complexity really require cognitive complexity? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society: Biological Sciences: Social Intelligence: From Brain to Culture, 362, 561–575.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayne, T. A. (2003). What is the unity of consciousness? In E. A. Cleeremans (Ed.), The unity of consciousness: Binding, integration, dissociation (pp. 23–27). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauregard, V., & Paquette, M. (2006). Neural correlates of a mystical experience in Carmelite nuns. Neuroscience Letters, 405(3), 186–190.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bermúdez, J. L. (2000). The paradox of self-consciousness: Representation and mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bitbol, M., & Petitmengin, C. (2011). On pure reflection: A reply to Dan Zahavi. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 18(2), 24–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore, S. (1999). The meme machine. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore, S. (2012). She won’t be me. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 19(1–2), 16–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blakeslee, S., & Blakeslee, M. (2008). The body has a mind of its own: How body maps in your brain help you do (almost) everything better. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bosco, F. M. (1998). Sharedness as an innate basis for communication in the infant. Proceedings of the 20th Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Mahwah: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Botvinick, M., & Cohen, J. (1998). Rubber hand ‘feels’ touch that eyes see. Nature, 391, 756.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brockman, J. (1997). Organs of computation: A talk with Steven Pinker. Retrieved 28 June 2012, from edge third culture: http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/pinker/pinker_p1.html.

  • Bruijn, N. G. (1996). Can people think? Journal of Consciousness Studies, 3(5–6), 425–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruun, H., & Langlais, R. (2003). On the embodied nature of action. Acta Sociologica, 46(1), 31–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castellano, G., Villalba, S., & Camurri, A. (2007). Recognising human emotions from body movement and gesture dynamics. In R. P. A. Paiva (Ed.), Affective Computing and Intelligent Interaction, Second International Conference, ACII 2007, Lisbon (Vol. 4738, pp. 71–82). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castellano, G., Kessous, L., & Caridakis, G. (2008). Emotion recognition through multiple modalities: Face, body gesture, speech. In Lecture Notes in Computer Science: Affect and Emotion in Human-Computer Interaction (Vol. 4868, pp. 92–103).

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers, D. (1995). The puzzle of conscious experience. Scientific American, 273, 62–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chalmers, D. (1999). The scientific American book of the brain. New York: The Lyons Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, H., Cohen, P., Johnson, J., Kasen, S., Sneed, J., & Crawford, T. (2004). Adolescent personality disorders and conflict with romantic partners during the transition to adulthood. Journal of Personality Disorders, 18, 507–525.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Churchland, P. S., & Sejnowski, T. (1997). The computational brain. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, J. (2004). Still lives: Narratives of spinal cord injury. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cole, J. (2009). Impaired embodiment and intersubjectivity. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 8(3), 343–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costantini, M., & Haggard, P. (2007). The rubber hand illusion: Sensitivity and reference frame for body ownership. Consciousness and Cognition, 16, 229–240.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cotterill, R. M. (2001). Evolution, cognition and consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8(2), 3–17.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coulter, J. (1979). The brain as agent. Human Studies, 2(4), 335–348.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crane, E., Gross, M., & Fredrickson, B. (2006). Expression of emotion in body and face. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Intelligent Virtual Agents (p. 452).

    Google Scholar 

  • Crick, F. (1995). The astonishing hypothesis: The scientific search for the soul. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crick, F. H., & Koch, C. (1990). Toward a neurobiological theory of consciousness. Seminars in the Neuroscience, 2, 263–275.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cytowic, R. (2002). Synesthesia: A union of the senses. Cambridge: Bradford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlberg, C. P. (2011). How embarrassing: Researchers pinpoint self-consciousness in the brain. Scientific American.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason and the human brain. New York: G. P. Putnam’s Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. R. (1998). Investigating the biology of consciousness. Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences—The Conscious Brain: Abnormal and Normal, 353(1377), 1879–1882.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. (1999). Feeling of what happens: Body and emotion in the making of consciousness. London: Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Damasio, A. (2003). Looking for Spinoza: Joy, sorrow and the feeling brain. London: William Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daprati, E., Sirigu, A., & Nico, D. (2010). Body and movement: Consciousness in the parietal lobes. Neuropsychologia, 48, 756–762.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • d’Aquili, E., & Newberg, A. (1993). Liminality, trance and unitary states in ritual and meditation. Studia Liturgica, 23, 2–34.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (1872). The expression of emotions in man and animals (1st ed.). London: John Murray.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, R., & McEwen, B. (2012). Social influences on neuroplasticity: Stress and interventions to promote well-being. Nature Neuroscience, 15, 689–695.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. (1976). The selfish gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Hedonia, eudaimonia, and well-being: An introduction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. (1991). Consciousness explained. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennett, D. (1996). Facing backwards on the problem of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 3(1), 4–6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 542–575.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dimaggio, G., Lysaker, P., Carcione, A., Nicolo, G., & Semerari, A. (2008). Know yourself and you shall know the other… to a certain extent: Multiple paths of influence of self-reflection on mindreading. Consciousness and Cognition, 17, 778–789.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dretske, F. (1995). Naturalizing the mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edelman, G. M. (1998). Building a picture of the brain. Daedalus: The Brain, 127(2), 37–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellis, R. D. (2005). The roles of imagery and meta-emotion in deliberate choice and moral psychology. In G. Colombetti & E. Thompson (Eds.), Journal of Consciousness Studies, 12(8–10), 140–157.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elster, J. (1998). Emotions and economic theory. Journal of Economic Literature, 36(1), 47–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson, P. S., Perfilieva, E., Björk-Eriksson, T., Alborn, A.-M., Nordborg, C., Peterson, D. A., et al. (1998). Neurogenesis in the adult human hippocampus. Nature Medicine, 4, 1313–1317.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Feigl, H. (1967). The “mental” and the “physical”. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feinberg, T. E. (2001). Altered egos: How the brain creates the self. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fields, J., Copp, M., & Kleinman, S. (2007). Symbolic interactionism, inequality and emotions. In J. E. Stets & J. H. Turner (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of emotions (pp. 155–178). Berlin: Springer Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foucault, M. (1988). Technologies of the self. In L. H. Martin, H. Gutman, & P. H. Hutton (Eds.), University of Massachusetts Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Franks, D. D. (2007). The neuroscience of emotions. In J. E. Stets & J. H. Turner (Eds.), Handbook of the sociology of emotions (pp. 38–62). Berlin: Springer Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frederickson, B. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56(3), 218–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs, T. (2011). The brain: A mediating organ. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 18(7–8), 196–221.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gait Changes May Signal Cognitive Decline, Presage Alzheimer’s. (2012). Retrieved from Medical News Today: http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/247862.php.

  • Gallagher, S. (2000). Philosophical conceptions of the self: Implications for cognitive science. Trends in the Cognitive Sciences, 4(1), 14–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, S. (2005). How the body shapes the mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, S. (2006). Where’s the action? Epiphenomenalism and the problem of free will. In W. Banks, S. Pockett, & S. Gallagher (Eds.), Does consciousness cause behaviour: An investigation of the nature of volition (pp. 109–124). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, S. (Ed.). (2011). The Oxford handbook of the self. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, S., & Cole, J. (1998). In D. Welton (Ed.), Body and flesh: A philosophical reader. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, S., & Marcel, A. (1999). The self in contextualized action. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6(4), 4–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, S., & Panksepp, J. (2008). How to undress the affective mind: An interview with Jaak Panksepp. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 15(2), 89–119.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallup, G. G. (1977). Self recognition in primates: A comparative approach to the bidirectional properties of consciousness. American Psychologist, 32(5), 329–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gazzaniga, M. (2006). The ethical brain: The science of our moral dilemmas. New York: HarperCollins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gendron, M. (2010). Defining emotion: A brief history. Emotion Review, 2(4), 371–372.

    Google Scholar 

  • Georgieff, N., & Jeannerod, M. (1998). Beyond consciousness of external reality: A “who” system for consciousness of action and self-consciousness. Consciousness and Cognition, 7, 465–477.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Goldie, P. (2005). Imagination and the distorting power of emotion. In G. Colombetti (Ed.) Journal of Consciousness Studies, 12(8–10), 127–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, L. (2002). Emotion-focused therapy: Coaching clients to work through feelings. Washington: American Psychologist Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hanson, R. (2011). Institute of noetic sciences. Retrieved 10 May 2012 from http://www.noetic.org/noetic/issue-nine-april/self-directed-neuroplasticity/.

  • Harman, W. (1994). The scientific exploration of consciousness: Towards an adequate epistemology. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 1(1), 140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harnad, S. (2005, January 13). What is consciousness? Retrieved from The New York Review of Books: http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2005/jun/23/what-is-consciousness/.

  • Head, H. (1920). Studies in neurology (Vol. 2). London: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilman, K. M., Barrett, A. M., & Adair, J. C. (1998). Possible mechanisms of anosognosia: A defect in self-awareness. Philosophical Transactions: Biological Sciences, 353(1377), 1903–1909.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hejmadi, A., Davidson, R., & Rozin, P. (2000). Exploring hindu Indian emotion expressions: Evidence for accurate recognition by Americans and Indians. Psychological Science, 2(3), 183–187.

    Google Scholar 

  • Helmuth, L. (2002). Redrawing the brain’s map of the body. Science, New Series, 296(5573), 1587–1588.

    Google Scholar 

  • How Embarrassing: Researchers Pinpoint Self-Consciousness in the Brain. (2011). Retrieved from Scientific American Mind: http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=how-embarrassing&WT.mc_id=SA_DD_20111013.

  • Hume, D. (1947). In N. K. Smith (Ed.), Dialogues concerning natural religion. Edinburgh: Nelson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey, N. (2006). Seeing red: A study in consciousness. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iacoboni, M., Molnar-Szakacs, I., Gallese, V., Buccino, G., Mazziotta, J., & Rizzolatti, G. (2005). Grasping the intentions of others with one’s own mirror neuron system. PLoS Biology, 3(3), 0529–0535.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iyengar, S. S. (2000a). When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 995–1006.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Iyengar, S. S. (2000b). When choice is demotivating: Can one desire too much of a good thing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 1004.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackendoff, R. (1987). Consciousness and the computational mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, F. (1977). Perception. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1884). What is an emotion? First published in Mind, 9, 188–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. Retrieved 7 Apr 2012, from Classics in the History of Psychology: http://psychclassics.asu.edu/James/Principles/prin10.htm.

  • James, W. (1985). In M. E. Marty (Ed.), The varieties of religious experience: Edited with an introduction. New York: Penguin Classics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, R. (1990). Neuropsychology, neuropsychiatry and behavioural neurology. New York: Plenum Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kandel, E. R., & Squire, L. R. (2000). Neuroscience: Breaking down scientific barriers to the study of brain and mind. Science, 290(5494), 1113–1120.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kaufman, G. F., & Libby, L. K. (2012). Changing beliefs and behavior through experience-taking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103, 1.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, E. F., Kelly, E. W., Crabtree, A., Gauld, A., Grosso, M., & Greyson, B. (2007). Irreducible mind: Toward a psychology for the 21st century. Plymouth: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kircher, T. T., & Leube, D. T. (2003). Self-consciousness, self-agency and Schizophrenia. Consciousness and Cognition, 12(4), 656–669.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Koch, C., & Greenfield, S. (2007). How does consciousness happen? Scientific American, 297, 50–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozart, M. (1998). Religious experience was not correctly defined. Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 10, 475.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kring, A. M. (2010). The future of emotion research in the study of psychopathology. Emotion Review, 2(3), 225–228.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kupperman, J. J. (1991). Character. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kupperman, J. J. (1999). Learning from Asian philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langlitz, N. (2010). The persistence of the subjective in neuropsychopharmacology: Observations of contemporary hallucinogen research. History of the Human Sciences, 23(1), 37–57.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • LeDoux, J. (1998). The emotional brain: The mysterious underpinnings of emotional life. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • LeDoux, J. (2002). Synaptic self: How our brains become who we are. New York: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Legrand, D., & Ravn, S. (2009). Perceiving subjectivity in bodily movement: The case of dancers. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 8, 389–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liviingston, P. (2002). Experience and structure: Philosophical history and the problem of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 9(3), 15–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lopez, C., Halje, P., & Blanke, O. (2008). Body ownership and embodiment: Vestibular and multisensory mechanisms. Clinical Neurophysiology, 38, 149–161.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Luria, A. (1968). The mind of a mnemonist: A little book about a vast memory. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lutz, A., Greischar, L. L., Rawlings, N. B., Ricard, M., & Davidson, R. J. (2004). Long-term meditators self-induce high-amplitude gamma synchrony during mental practice. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences, 101(46), 16369–16373.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lycan, W. G. (1995). Consciousness. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lycan, W. G. (1996). Consciousness and experience. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madell, G., & Ridley, A. (1997). Emotion and feeling. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary (Vol. 71, pp. 147–176). Blackwell Publishing on behalf of the Aristotelian Society.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maguire, E., Gadian, D., & Johnsrude, I. (2000). Navigation-related structural change in the hippocampi of taxi drivers. Proceedings of the National Academy of the Sciences of the USA, (pp. 4398–4403).

    Google Scholar 

  • Majorek, M. B. (2012). Does the brain cause conscious experience? Journal of Consciousness Studies, 19(3–4), 121–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manoussakis, J. P. (2007). God after metaphysics. Bloomington: Indian University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGinn, C. (1997). The character of mind: An introduction to the philosophy of mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menon, S. (2001). Towards a Sankarite approach to consciousness: A discussion in the context of recent interdisciplinary scientific perspectives. Journal of Indian Council of Philosophical Research, 18(1), 95–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menon, S. (2002). Structure of mind and structured mind. Indian Philosophical Quarterly, 2(3), 335–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menon, S. (2003). Binding experiences for a first person approach: Looking at Indian ways of thinking (darsana) and acting (natya) in the context of current discussions on ‘consciousness’. In C. Chakraborti, M. K. Mandal, & R. B. Chatterjee (Eds.), On mind and consciousness (pp. 90–117). Shimla: Indian Institute of Advanced Study, Shimla and Department of Humanities and Social Sciences IIT Kharagpur.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menon, S. (2009). The rain clouds of mind-modifications and the shower of transcendence: Yoga and Samadhi in Patanjali Yoga Sutra. In R. Rao (Ed.), Yoga and parapsychology: Empirical research and theoretical essays (pp. 169–199). Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menon, S. (2011). A first-person approach to aesthetic emotions in Natyasastra. In R. Narasimha & S. Menon (Eds.), Nature and culture (pp. 259–270). New Delhi: PHISPC and Centre for Studies in Civilisations.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menon, S., & Bodhananda, S. (2003). Dialogues: Philosopher meets seer. New Delhi: Bluejay Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merabet, L., Battelli, L., Obretenova, S., Maguire, S., Meijer, P., & Pascual-Leone, A. (2009). Functional recruitment of visual cortex for sound encoded object identification in the blind. NeuroReport, 20(2), 132–138.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1964). The primacy of perception. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metzinger, T. (2003). Being no one: The self-model theory of subjectivity. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Metzinger, T. (2009). The ego tunnel: The science of the mind and the myth of the self. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morison, R. S. (1983). Is there a biological person? The Milbank Memorial Fund Quarterly: Health and Society: Special Issue: The Problem of Personhood: Biomedical, Social, Legal and Policy Views, 61(1), 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Motluk, A. (2005). Seeing with your ears. New York: The New York Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, T. (1974). What is it like to be a bat? Philosophical Review, 83, 435–450.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neisser, U. (1988). Five kinds of self-knowledge. Philosophical Psychology, 1(1), 35–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelkin, N. (1993). What is consciousness? Philosophy of Science, 60(3), 419–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newberg, A., d’Aquili, E., & Rause, V. (2001). Why god won’t go away. New York: Ballantine Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nixon, G. M. (2012). You are not your brain: Against “teaching to the brain”. In D. King, & K. Dyer (Eds.), International Handbook of Academic Research and Teaching: Proceedings of Intellectbase International Consortium (Vol. 22, pp. 298–306). San Antonio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nurius, P. S. (1993). Human memory: A basis for better understanding the elusive self-concept. Social Service Review, 67(2), 261–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberman, L. M., Hubbard, E. M., McCleery, J. P., Altschuler, E. L., Ramachandran, V. S., & Pineda, J. A. (2005). EEG evidence for mirror neuron dysfunction in autism spectrum disorders. Cognitive Brain Research, 24, 190–198.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oltmanns, T. F., Gleason, M. E., Klonsky, E. D., & Turkheimer, E. (2005). Meta-perception for pathological personality traits: Do we know when others think that we are difficult? Consciousness and Cognition, 14, 739–751.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ortony, A., & Turner, T. (1990). What’s basic about basic emotions? Psychological Review, 97(3), 315–331.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paddock, C. (2012). Gait changes may signal cognitive decline, presage Alzheimer’s. Retrieved from Medical News Today: http://www.medicalnewstoday.com/articles/247862.php.

  • Panksepp, J. (2005). On the embodied neural nature of core emotional affects. In G. Colombetti, & E. Thompson (Eds.), Journal of Consciousness Studies, 12(8–10), 158–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Panksepp, J., Asma, S., Curran, G., Gabriel, R., & Greif, T. (2012). The philosophical implications of affective neuroscience. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 19(3–4), 6–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker, E. S., Cahill, L., & Mcgaugh, J. L. (2006). A case of unusual autobiographical remembering. Neurocase, 12, 35–49.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Patten, S. (1976). Hume’s bundles, self-consciousness and Kant. Hume Studies, 2(2), 59–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penfield, W. (1947). Ferrier lecture: Some observations on the cerebral cortex of man. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 134(876), 329–347.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Penfield, W. (1959). The interpretive cortex. Science, New Series, 129(3365), 1719–1725.

    Google Scholar 

  • Penrose, R. (1994). Shadows of the mind. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petranker, J. (2003). Inhabiting conscious experience: Engaged objectivity in the first-person study of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 10(12), 3–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Philippi, C. L., et al. (2012). Preserved self-awareness following extensive bilateral brain damage to the insula, anterior cingulate, and medial prefrontal cortices. PLoS ONE, 7(8), e38413.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pile, S. (1993). Human agency and human geography revisited: A critique of ‘new models’ of the self. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 18(1), 122–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinker, S. (1997). In J. Brockman (Ed.), Organs of computation: A talk with Steven Pinker. Retrieved 28 June 2012, from Edge Third Culture: http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/pinker/pinker_p2.html.

  • Polanyi, M. (1966). The tacit dimension. London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, L. (2000). The bifurcated gift: Love and intimacy in drama psychotherapy. The Arts in Psychotherapy, 7(5), 309–320.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pouivet, R. (2000). On the cognitive functioning of aesthetic emotions. Leonardo, 33(1), 49–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Premack, D. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1, 512–526.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prinz, J. (2005). Are emotions feelings? In G. Colombetti, & E. Thompson (Eds.), Journal of Consciousness Studies, 12(8–10), 9–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandran, V. A. (1998). Phantoms in the brain. New York: William Morrow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandran, V. (2003). The emerging mind. London: The BBC in association with Profile Books Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandran, V., & Blakeslee, S. (1998). Phantoms in the brain. New York: William Morrow.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandran, V. S., & Hirstein, W. (1997). Three laws of Qualia: What neurology tells us about the biological functions of consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 4(5–6), 429–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramachandran, V. S., & Hirstein, W. (1998). The perception of phantom limbs: The D. O. Hebb lecture. Brain, 121(1), 1603–1630.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reber, A. S. (1993). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge: An essay on the cognitive unconscious. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid, T. (1994). In R. E. Beanblossom, & K. Lehrer (Eds.), Inquiry and essays. Indianapolis: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Restak, R. M. (1982). The archaeology of the self. The Wilson Quarterly, 6(3), 98–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Restak, R. M. (1985). The human brain: Insights and puzzles. Theory into Practise: Learning and the Brain, 24(2), 91–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rizzolatti, G., Fadiga, L., Gallese, V., & Fogassi, L. (1996). Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions. Cognitive Brain Research, 3, 131–141.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Robbins, A., Adler, S., Eigen, M., Roland, A., Strahl, L., & Wallace, E. (1979). Dialogue in creative and therapeutic growth. Art Psychotherapy, 6, 221–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roberts, R. C. (1988). What an emotion is: A sketch. The Philosophical Review, 97(2), 183–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, N. (2003). Neurochemical selves. Society, 41(1), 46–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfield, I. (1995). Memory and identity. New Literary History: Narratives of Literature, the Arts, and Memory, 26(1), 197–203.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, D. M. (2003). Unity of consciousness and the self. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, New Series, 103, 325–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudrauf, D., & Damasio, A. (2005). A conjecture regarding the biological mechanism of subjectivity and feeling. In G. Colombetti, & E. Thompson (Eds.), Journal of Consciousness Studies, 12(8–10), 236–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Russell, J. A., & Barrett, L. F. (2009). Editorial. Emotion Review, 1(1), 2.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 1069–1081.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryff, C., Singer, B., & Love, G. (2004). Positive health: Connecting well-being with biology. Philoosphical Transactions, 1383–1394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, O. (1985). the man who mistook his wife for a hat and other clinical tales. New York: Summit Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saks, E. R. (1999). Interpreting interpretation: The limits of hermeneutic psychoanalysis. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandhana, L. (2003, October 7). Blind 'see with sound'. Retrieved September 10, 2013, from BBC News: http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/science/nature/3171226.stm.

  • Saver, J. L., & Rabin, J. (1997). The neural substrates of religious experiences. Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 9(3), 498–510.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schilder, P. (1950). The image and appearance of the human body. New York: International Universities Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, J. M., & Begley, S. (2002). The mind and the brain: Neuroplasticity and the power of the mental force. New York: HarperCollins Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott Haig, M. (2007). The brain: The power of hope. TIME, 58–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. (1995, November 2). The mystery of consciousness. The New York Review of Books, 63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. R. (2006). Minding the brain. The New York Review of Books, LIII(17), 51–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. (2011, June 9). The Mystery of Consciousness Continues. Retrieved from The New York Review of Books: http://www.nybooks.com/articles/archives/2011/jun/09/mystery-consciousness-continues/.

  • Seligman, M. (2002). Authentic happiness. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seth, A. K., Izhikevich, E., Reeke, G. N., & Edelman, G. M. (2006). Theories and measures of consciousness: An extended framework. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103(28), 10799–10804.

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shanahan, D. (2008). A new view of language, emotion and the brain. Integrative Psychological and Behavioural Science, 42, 6–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shear, J. (1996). The hard problem: Closing the empirical gap. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 3(1), 54–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shear, J. (2007). Lecture on “Reflections on Embodiment” at the International Conference Titled “Body, Embodiment and Enworldment”. Bangalore: National Institute of Advanced Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherrington, C. S. (1906). The integrative action of the nervous system. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoemaker, S. (1994). The first-person perspective. Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association, 68(2), 7–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoemaker, S. (2003). Identity, cause, and mind: Philosophical essays. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shoemaker, S., & Strawson, G. (1999). Self and body. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, Supplementary Volumes, 73, 287–332.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simmel, M. L. (1958). The conditions of occurrence of phantom limbs. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society, 102(5), 492–500.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloan, D. M. (2006). The importance of emotion in psychotherapy approaches. Journal of Contemporary Psychotherapy, 36, 59–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, D. L. (2003). In W. Dryden (Ed.), Psychoanalysis in focus. London: Sage Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, R. C. (1986). Emotions, Feelings, Contexts. The Journal of Philosophy, 83(11), 653–654.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, A. W., Camprodon, J. A., Bermpohl, F., Merabet, L., Rotman, S., Hemond, C., et al. (2007). Shape conveyed by visual-to-auditory sensory substitution activates the lateral occipital complex. Nature Neuroscience, 10(6), 687–689.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Strawson, G. (1997). The self. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 4(5–6), 405–428.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strawson, G. (2009). Selves: An essay in revisionary metaphysics. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stuss, D. T., & Alexander, M. P. (2005). Does damage to the frontal lobes produce impairment in memory? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(2), 84–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan, P. R. (2006). Are current philosophical theories of consciousness useful to neuroscientists? Behavior and Philosophy, 34, 59–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tauber, A. I. (2009). Freud’s dreams of reason: The Kantian structure of psychoanalysis. History of the Human Sciences, 22(4), 1–29.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E. (2001). Empathy and consciousness. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 8(5–7), 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tirassa, M., Bosco, F. M., & Colle, L. (2006). Rethinking the ontogeny of mindreading. Consciousness and Cognition, 15, 197–217.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tomasello, M., & Rakoczy, H. (2003). What makes human cognition unique. From individual to shared to collective intentionality. Mind and Language, 8, 121–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tye, M. (1995). Ten problems of consciousness: A representational theory of the phenomenal mind. Cambridge: MIT Press/Bradford Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tye, Q. From Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy First published Wed Aug 20, 1997; substantive revision Tue Jul 31, 2007, http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/qualia/. Accessed on 27th October 2011.

  • Tye, M. (2003). Consciousness and persons: Unity and identity. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varela, F. J., & Shear, J. (1999a). First-person methodologies: What, why, how? Journal of Consciousness Studies, 6(2–3), 1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varela, F., & Shear, J. (Eds.). (1999b). The view from within: First person approaches to consciousness. England: Imprint Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Varela, F., Thompson, E., & Rosch, E. (1991). The embodied mind: Cognitive science and human experience. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vignemonta, F. D. (2007). Habeas corpus: The sense of ownership of one’s own body. Mind and Language, 22, 427–449.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vignemonta, F. D., & Fourneretb, P. (2004). The sense of agency: A philosophical and empirical review of the “Who” system. Consciousness and Cognition, 13, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Washburn, M. (2012). Rethinking the notion of the ego. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 19(3–4), 194–222.

    Google Scholar 

  • Westen, D. (1992). The cognitive self and the psychoanalytic self: Can we put our selves together? Psychological Inquiry, 3(1), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilkes, K. V. (1984). Is consciousness important? The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 35(3), 223–243.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1980). The blue and brown book. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahavi, D. (1999). Self-awareness and alterity: A phenomenological investigation. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahavi, D. (2005). Self and subjectivity: Investigating the first-person perspective. Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahavi, D. (2011). Varieties of reflection. Journal of Consciousness Studies, 18(2), 9–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaner, R. M. (1971). The problem of embodiment: Some contributions to a phenomenology of the body (phaenomenologica). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zarrilli, P. B. (2000). When the body becomes all eyes: Paradigms, discourses and practices of power in kalarippayattu, a South Indian martial art. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sangeetha Menon .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer India

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Menon, S. (2014). The Feel Factor: Qualia and the Affective Markers of Experience. In: Brain, Self and Consciousness. Studies in Neuroscience, Consciousness and Spirituality, vol 3. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1581-3_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics