Graceful Migration of Agile Systems Across Next-Generation Life Cycle Boundaries

Part of the Flexible Systems Management book series (FLEXSYS)


In this chapter, we explore the nature of migration as it applies to crossing system-retirement life cycle boundaries gracefully, intending to inform purposeful design of would-be, long-lived, always-effective enterprises, and the systems that support them. We use previous work on agile systems and enterprises to define migration as the crossing of a change in basic infrastructure, be it technical, organizational, or strategic. We consider the classic view of the system life cycle and highlight its limitations in a rapidly changing world. We analyze two successful and contemporary large-scale migrations and illuminate the factors that facilitated their success, contributing toward a pattern language for agile-system architecture in the process. Finally, the lessons of the analysis are suggested as potential informants for force transformation in the US military and adoption of service-oriented architectures in the enterprise.


Internet Protocol Pattern Language System Life Cycle System Owner Home Entertainment 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Alexander C, Ishikawa S, Silverstein M, Jacobson M, Fiksdahl-King I, Angel S (1977) A pattern language: towns, buildings, construction. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. Beijnum I (2007) Everything you need to know about IPv6, ars technica. March,
  3. Beijnum I (2008) The night the IETF turned off IPv4, ars technica. March 2008,
  4. Cebrowski AK (2004) Military transformation: a strategic approach. U.S. Department of Defense, Office of Force TransformationGoogle Scholar
  5. Cloutier R (2006) Applicability of patterns to architecting complex systems. Ph.D. Dissertation, Stevens Institute of Technology, HobokenGoogle Scholar
  6. Dove R (1992) What’s all this talk about agility – the 21st century manufacturing enterprise strategy, prevision, Japan management association.
  7. Dove R (2001) Response ability – the language, structure, and culture of the agile enterprise. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. Dove R (2005) Fundamental principles for agile systems engineering, Conference on Systems Engineering Research (CSER), Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken,
  9. Dove R (2007) SDOE 678 and 683 course materials. Stevens Institute of Technology, School of Systems and Enterprises, available by request to rick.dove@stevens.eduGoogle Scholar
  10. Dove R, Turkington G (2008) Relating Agile development to Agile operations. Conference on Systems Engineering Research (CSER), University of Southern California, Redondo Beach, April,
  11. Engel A, Tyson B (2008) Designing systems for adaptability by means of architecture options. forthcoming in Syst Eng 11(2),
  12. Goldman S, Nagel R, Preiss K (1995) Agile competitors and virtual organizations. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. INCOSE (2007) Systems engineering handbook – a guide for system life cycle processes and activities. Version 3.1, International Council on Systems Engineering, Aug
  14. Nagel R, Dove R, Goldman S, Preiss K (1991) 21st century manufacturing enterprise strategy, volumes 1 and 2. DIANE Publishing Company, Collingdale, PAGoogle Scholar
  15. NASCIO (2006) Service oriented architecture: an enabler of the agile enterprise. National Association of State Chief Information Officers,
  16. OASIS (n.d.) Committee Categories: SOA.
  17. Research Evidence Based (2003) Network centric operations conceptual framework. Prepared for John Garstka Office of Force Transformation by Evidence Based Research, Inc., Vienna VA, Nov,
  18. Upton D, Staats B (2008) Radically simple IT. Harvard Business Review, March. W3C, Web Services Activities, World Wide Web ConsortiumGoogle Scholar
  19. W3C (2004) Web Services Architecture, World Wide Web Consortium,

Copyright information

© Springer India 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Stevens Institute of TechnologyHobokenUSA
  2. 2.Paradigm Shift InternationalColumbiaUSA

Personalised recommendations