Flexibility, Controllability and Risk Measurement Metrics in Changing Pattern of Business Environment

  • Arnab Mitra
Part of the Flexible Systems Management book series (FLEXSYS)


Management Systems has traversed a long way since its inception. The shift is visible from disintegrative mechanistic paradigm to a systemic paradigm. The transformation has followed continua, which is resultant of continuous dynamic interplay between the thesis and the antithesis.

Today’s business environment is more like a white water Kayak race. To succeed in today’s environment, it’s important to have courage in heart with a clear objective to integrate and synthesize the best ideas. Simplicity is a natural instinct in the face of the accelerating pace of change. But in a given situation with so many options, this may be seductive and can cause for destruction. One sign of the struggle for understanding this changing pattern of business is the growing number of organizational change program instituted since the late 1980s. The need is to balance the paradoxes that run through the development, operation, and continual transformation of the enterprises. Managers in the decade ahead will acknowledge and overcome this chaos and complexity not with some set of formulae or rigid management doctrines but by working flexibly and with uncommon intelligence by managing paradox itself.

This chapter is an attempt to identify, select, and establish such flexibility and controllability measurement metrics to understand the paradoxes in a more meaningful manner.


Delphi Method Delphi Study Delphi Process Organizational Flexibility Ground Theory Methodology 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Aaker DA, Mascarenhas B (1984) The need for strategic flexibility. J Bus Strat 5:74–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abernathy WJ, Utterback JM (1978) Patterns of industrial innovation. Technol Rev 80Google Scholar
  3. Adler M, Ziglio E (1996) Gazing into the oracle: the Delphi method and its application to social policy and public health. Kingsley Publishers, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Andrew P, Hatum A (2006) Determinants of organizational flexibility: a study in an emerging economy. Br J Manag 17(2): 115–137. ISSN 1467–8551Google Scholar
  5. Ansoff I (1965) Corporate strategy – an analytic approach to business policy for growth and expansion. McGraw-Hill, New York 2:20–26Google Scholar
  6. Anthony RN (1965) Planning and control systems: a framework for analysis, Graduate School of Business Administration. Harvard University, BostonGoogle Scholar
  7. Anthony RN (1988) The management control function. The Harvard Business School Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  8. Anthony RN, Dearden J, Bedford NM (1989) Management control systems, 6th edn. Richard D. Irwin Inc., IllinoisGoogle Scholar
  9. Anthony RN, Govindarajan V (2004) Management control systems. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Ashton R (1986) Combining the judgments of experts: how many and which ones? Organ Behav Hum Decis Process 38(3):405–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Benner MJ, Tushman ML (2002) Process management and technological innovation: a longitudinal study of the photography and paint industries. Adm Sci Q 47:676–706, Benner and Tushman (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Berry AJ, Broadbent J, Otley DT (eds) (1998) Management control theory – history of management thought. Dartmouth Publishing, AldershotGoogle Scholar
  13. Bolger F, Wright G (1994) Assessing the quality of expert judgment: issues and analysis. Decis Support Syst 11(1):1–24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Carpenter RD (1995) Grounded theory research approach. In: Streubert HJ, Carpenter RD (eds) Qualitative research and in nursing: advancing the humanistic imperative. J.B. Lippincott Company, Philadelphia, pp 145–161Google Scholar
  15. Carroll JJ (1987) Control methodologies for achievement of strategic objectives. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation, Nova University, Fort LauderdaleGoogle Scholar
  16. Chua WF, Lowe T, Puxty T (eds) (1989) Critical perspectives in management control. Macmillan, BasingstokeGoogle Scholar
  17. Coccia R (2006) ERM plans cut costs, help risk managers bring added value. Bus Insur 40(21):4–4Google Scholar
  18. Daft RL, Lewin AY (1993) Where are the theories for the ‘New’ organizational forms? Organ Sci 4(4):i–vi (An editorial essay)Google Scholar
  19. Dalkey NC, Helmer O (1963) An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Manage Sci 9(3):458–467CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Delbecq AL, Van de Ven AH, Gustafson DH (1975) Group techniques for program planning: a guide to nominal and Delphi Processes. Scott, Foresman and Co, GlenviewGoogle Scholar
  21. DuBrin (2000) Fundamentos de administración, Soluciones empresariales, Edition 5. International Thomson Editores, S. A. de C. V.Google Scholar
  22. Ebben J, Johnson A (2005) Efficiency flexibility or both? SMJ 26:1249–1259Google Scholar
  23. Egelkraut TM, Woodard JD, Garcia P, Pennings JME (2005) Portfolio diversification with commodity futures: properties of levered futures. NCR-134 conference on applied commodity price analysis, forecasting, and market risk management, St. LouisGoogle Scholar
  24. Eisenhardt KM, Martin JA (2000) Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strategic Manage J 21:1105–1121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Eppink JD (1978) Planning for strategic flexibility. Long Range Plann 11:9–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fink A, Kosecoff J (1985) How to conduct surveys: a step-by-step guide. SAGE, Beverly HillsGoogle Scholar
  27. Fredman AJ, Wiles R (1998) How mutual funds work. Prentice-Hall, ParamusGoogle Scholar
  28. Garrison RH, Noreen EW (2000) Managerial accounting. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Giddens A (1999) Risk and responsibility. Mod Law Rev 62(1):1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Harrigan (1985) Strategies for joint venture. Lexinton Books, LexintonGoogle Scholar
  31. Hartman F, Baldwin A (1995) Using technology to improve the Delphi method. J Comput Civil Eng 9:244–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hayes RH, Abernathy WJ (1980) Managing our way to economic decline. Harvard Bus Rev 58:67–77Google Scholar
  33. Helfat C, Finkelstein S, Mitchell W, Peteraf M, Singh H, Teece D, Winter S (2007) Dynamic capabilities: understanding strategic change in organisations. Blackwell Publishing, MaldenGoogle Scholar
  34. Kocourek P, Newfrock J, Van Lee R (2005) SOX rocks, but won’t block shocks. Strat Bus 38(Spring)Google Scholar
  35. Kraatz MS, Zajac EJ (2001) How organizational resources affect strategic change and performance in turbulent environments: theory and evidence. Organ Sci 12(5)Google Scholar
  36. Lenckus D (2006) Risk managers name top threats. Bus Insur 3+. ProQuestGoogle Scholar
  37. Linstone HA, Turoff M (1975) Introduction. In: Linstone HA, Turoff M (eds) The Delphi method: techniques and applications. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, pp 3–12Google Scholar
  38. Mason J (1996) Qualitative researching. Sage, LondonGoogle Scholar
  39. Merchant KA (1985) Control in Business Organizations. Ballinger, Cambridge, MA, p 161Google Scholar
  40. Merchant KA (1982) The control function of management. Sloan Manag Rev (Summer):43–55Google Scholar
  41. Nadkarni S, Narayanan VK (2007) Strategic schemas, strategic flexibility, and firm performance: the moderating role of industry clockspeed. Strategic Manage J 28(3):243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Otley DT (1989) A strategy for the development of theories in management control. In: Chua WF, Lowe T, Puxty T (eds) Critical perspectives in management control. Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp 27–45Google Scholar
  43. Otley D (1996) Some issues in management control. In: Vagnuer K, Wilkinson C, Berry AJ (eds) Beyond constraint – exploring the management control paradox. The Management Control Association, LondonGoogle Scholar
  44. Panning WH (2006) Managing interest rate risk: ALM, solvency, and franchise value. Willis Re White Paper, January. Presented to the international conference of actuaries, Paris, May 2006Google Scholar
  45. Parenté FJ, Anderson JK, Myers P, O’Brien T (1984) An examination of factors contributing to Delphi accuracy. J Forecasting 3(2):173–182CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Peterson M (2006) Indeterminate preferences. Philos Stud 130:297–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Prescott PA, Soeken KL (1989) The potential uses of pilot work. Nurs Res 38:60–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rowe, Wright (1999) The Delphi technique as a forecasting tool: issues and analysis. Int J Forecasting 15: 353–375Google Scholar
  49. Sanchez R (2004) Understanding competence-based management: identifying and managing five modes of competence. J Bus Res 57(5):518CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sather (2004) Managerial control of faculty by physical education, Department chairpersons. A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of doctorate of philosophy in the graduate school of the texas woman’s university health science departmentGoogle Scholar
  51. Schmidt R (1997) Managind Delphi surveys using nonparametric statistical techniques. Decis Sci 28(3):763–774CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Simons R (1995) Levers of control – how managers use innovative control systems to drive strategic renewal. Harvard Business School Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  53. Sommer RA (2003) Business process flexibility: a driver for outsourcing. Ind ManagData Syst 103(3):177–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Strauss A (1987) Qualitative analysis for social scientists. Cambridge University Press, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Strauss A, Corbin J (1990a) Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. Sage, Newbury ParkGoogle Scholar
  56. Strauss A, Corbin J (1990b) Grounded theory research: procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qual Sociol 13:3–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Strauss A, Corbin J (eds) (1997) Grounded theory in practice. Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  58. Strauss A, Corbin J (1998) Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory, 2nd edn. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, Street corner society revisited (1992) J Contemp Ethnogr 21(special issue):3–132Google Scholar
  59. Stoner JAF, Wankei C (1986) Management. Prentice-Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  60. Sushil (1999/2000a) Corporate flexibility. Glob J Flex Syst ManagGoogle Scholar
  61. Sushil (2000) SAP-LAP models of inquiry. Manag Decis 38:347–353Google Scholar
  62. Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Manage J 18(7)Google Scholar
  63. Verdu Jover AJ, Llorens-Montes JF, Garcia-Morales VJ (2005) Flexibility, fit and innovative capacity: an empirical examination. Int J Technol Manage 30(1,2)Google Scholar
  64. Volberda HW (1998) Building the flexible firm. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  65. Volberda HW (1996) Toward the flexible form: how to remain vital in hypercompetitive environments. Organ Sci 7(4):359–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.KPMGGurgaonIndia

Personalised recommendations