Mechanism of Removal of Contaminants by Aquatic Plants

  • Bhupinder Dhir


Plants possess highly specific and efficient mechanisms to acquire essential micronutrients from the environment. Uptake and removal of contaminant varies for each category of aquatic macrophyte i.e. free-floating, submerged and emergent. The mode of uptake by plants is also different for organic and inorganic contaminant. Uptake of inorganic compounds (ionic or complexed form) is mediated by active or passive uptake mechanisms within the plant, whereas uptake of organic compounds is generally governed by hydrophobicity (log k ow) and polarity. Uptake of pollutants by plant roots is different for organic and inorganic compounds. Uptake of inorganic contaminants is facilitated by membrane transporters, while uptake of organic contaminants is driven by simple diffusion based on their chemical properties. Assimilated and absorbed contaminant is then transformed and detoxified by a variety of biochemical reactions in the plant system using versatile enzymatic machineries.


Aquatic Plant Organic Contaminant Iron Plaque Inorganic Contaminant Foliar Absorption 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Literature Cited

  1. Abedin MJ, Feldmann J, Medarg AA (2002) Uptake kinetics of arsenic species in rice plants. Plant Physiol 128:1120–1128CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aken BV, Correa PA, Schnoor JL (2010) Phytoremediation of polychlorinated biphenyls. New Trends Promis Environ Sci Technol 44(8):2767–2776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Azqueta A, Shaposhnikov S, Collins AR (2009) DNA oxidation: investigating its key role in environmental mutagenesis with the comet assay. Mutat Res Genet Toxicol Environ Mutagen 674:101–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Best EPH, Sprecher SL, Larson SL, Fredrickson HL, Bader DF (1999a) Environmental behavior of explosives in groundwater from the Milan army ammunition plant in aquatic and wetland plant treatments. Uptake and fate of TNT and RDX in plants. Chemosphere 39:2057CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Best EPH, Sprecher SL, Larson SL, Fredrickson HL, Bader DF (1999b) Environmental behavior of explosives in groundwater from the Milan army ammunition plant in aquatic and wetland plant treatments. Removal, mass balances and fate in groundwater of TNT and RDX. Chemosphere 38:3383CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bhadra R, Spanggord RJ, Wayment DG, Hughes JB, Shanks JV (1999) Characterization of oxidation products of TNT metabolism in aquatic phytoremediation systems of Myriophyllum aquaticum. Environ Sci Technol 33:3354CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Brooks RR (1998) Plants that hyperaccumulate heavy metals. CAB International, Wallingford, 384Google Scholar
  8. Burken JG, Schnoor JL (1997) Uptake and metabolism of atrazine by poplar trees. Environ Sci Technol 31:1399–1406CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Burken JG, Ma XM, Struckhoff GC, Gilbertson AW (2005) Volatile organic compound fate in phytoremediation applications: natural and engineered systems. J Biosci 60:208–215Google Scholar
  10. Calderón-Preciado D, Matamoros V, Bayona JM (2011) Occurrence and potential crop uptake of emerging contaminants and related compounds in an agricultural irrigation network. Sci Total Environ 412–413:14–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cedergreen N, Madsen TV (2002) Nitrogen uptake by the floating macrophyte Lemna minor. New Phytol 155:285–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coleman JOD, Blake-Kalff MMA, Davies TGE (1997) Detoxification of xenobiotics by plants: chemical modification and vacuolar compartmentation. Trends Plant Sci 2:144–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Coleman JO, Frova C, Schroder P, Tussut M (2002) Exploiting plant metabolism for phytoremediation of persistent herbicides. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int 9:18–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cunningham SD, Anderson TA, Schwab P, Hsu FC (1996) Phytoremediation of soils contaminated with organic pollutants. Adv Agron 56:55–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Das N, Chandran P (2011) Microbial degradation of petroleum hydrocarbon contaminants: an overview. Biotechnol Res Int 2011:941810. doi: 10.4061/2011/941810, 13 pGoogle Scholar
  16. Dhir B (2010) Use of aquatic plants in removing heavy metals from wastewater. Int J Environ Eng 2(1/2/3):185–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dhir B, Sharmila P, Saradhi PP (2009) Potential of aquatic macrophytes for removing contaminants from the environment. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 39:754–781CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dietz AC, Schnoor JL (2001) Advances in phytoremediation. Environ Health Perspect 109:63–168Google Scholar
  19. Eapen S, Singh S, D’Souza SF (2007) Advances in development of transgenic plants for remediation of xenobiotic pollutants. Biotechnol Adv 25:442–451CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gao J, Garrison AW, Hoehamen C, Mazur CS, Wolfe NL (2000a) Uptake and phytotransformation of o, p DDT and p, p DDT by axenically cultivated aquatic plants. J Agric Food Chem 48:6121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gao J, Garrison AW, Hoehamen C, Mazur CS, Wolfe NL (2000b) Uptake and phytotransformation of organophosphorous pesticide by axenically cultivated aquatic plants. J Agric Food Chem 48:6114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Garrison AW, Nzengung VA, Avants JK, Ellington JJ, Jones WJ, Rennels D, Wolfe NL (2000) Phytodegradation of p, p′-DDT and the enantiomers of o, p′-DDT. Environ Sci Technol 34:1663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gessler A, Schneider S, von Sengbusch D, Werber P, Hanemann U, Huber C, Rothe A, Kreutzer K, Rennenberg H (1998) Field and laboratory experiments on net uptake of nitrate and ammonium by the roots of spruce (Picea abies) and beech (Fagus sylvatica) trees. New Phytol 138:275–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gobas EAPC, McNeil EJ, Lovett-Doust L, Haffner GD (1991) Bioconcentration of chlorinated aromatic hydrocarbons in aquatic macrophytes. Environ Sci Technol 25:924CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hattink J, Goeij JJM, Wolterbeek HT (2000) Uptake kinetics of 99Tc in common duckweed. Environ Exp Bot 44:9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hattink J, Harns AV, Goeij JJM (2003) Uptake, biotransformation and elimination of 99Tc in duckweed. Sci Total Environ 312:59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Henriksen GH, Raman DR, Walker LP, Spanswick RM (1992) Measurement of net fluxes of ammonium and nitrate at the surface of barley roots using ion-sensitive microelectrodes. Plant Physiol 99:734–747CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jacobson ME, Chiang SY, Gueriguian L, Weshtholm LR, Pierson J (2003) Transformation kinetics of trinitrotoluene conversion in aquatic plants. In: McCutcheon SC, Schnoor JL (eds) Phytoremediation: transformation and control of contaminants. Wiley, New York, pp 409–427Google Scholar
  29. Knuteson SL, Whitwell T, Klaine SJ (2002) Influence of plant age and size on simazine uptake and toxicity. J Environ Qual 31:2090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Komives T, Gullner G (2005) Phase 1 xenobiotic metabolic systems in plants. Z Naturforsch C 60:179–185Google Scholar
  31. Kvesitadze E, Sadunishvili T, Kvesitadze G (2009) Mechanisms of organic contaminants uptake and degradation in plants. World Acad Sci Eng Technol 31:454–464Google Scholar
  32. Lazof DB, Rufty TW, Redinbaugh MG (1992) Localization of nitrate absorption and translocation within morphological regions of the corn root. Plant Physiol 100:1251–1258CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Macek T, Mackova M, Ká J (2000) Exploitation of plants for the removal of organics in environmental remediation. Biotechnol Adv 18:23–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Marschner H (1995) Mineral nutrition of higher plants. Academic, San Diego, p 889Google Scholar
  35. Martinois E, Grill E, Tommasini R, Kreuz K, Amrehin N (1993) ATP dependent glutathione S-conjugate ‘export’ pump in the vacuolar membrane of plants. Nature 364:247–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Maurel C, Verdoucq L, Luu DT, Santoni V (2008) Plant aquaporins: membrane channels with multiple integrated functions. Annu Rev Plant Biol 59:595–624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McCutcheon SC, Schnoor JL (2003) Overview of phytotransformation and control of wastes. In: McCutcheon SC, Schnoor JL (eds) Phytoremediation: transformation and control of contaminants. Wiley, New York, pp 53–58Google Scholar
  38. Medina VF, Larson SL, Bergstedt AE, McCutcheon SC (2000) Phytoremoval of trinitrotoluene from water with batch kinetic studies. Water Res 34:2713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Morant M, Bak S, Moller BL, Werck-Reichhart D (2003) Plant cytochromes P450: tools for pharmacology, plant protection and phytoremediation. Curr Opin Biotechnol 2:151–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Murray BJ, Haddrell AE, Peppe S, Davies JF, Reid JP, O’Sullivan D, Price HC, Kumar R, Saunders RW, Plane JMC, Umo NS, Wilson TW (2012) Glass formation and unusual hygroscopic growth of iodic acid solution droplets with relevance for iodine mediated particle formation in the marine boundary layer. Atmos Chem Phys 12:8575–8587Google Scholar
  41. Ndimele PE (2010) A review on the phytoremediation of petroleum hydrocarbon. Pak J Biol Sci 13:715–722CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Nwoko CO (2010) Trends in phytoremediation of toxic elemental and organic pollutants. Afr J Biotechnol 9(37):6010–6016Google Scholar
  43. Nzengung VA, Jeffers P (2001) Sequestration, phytoreduction and phytooxidation of halogenated organic chemicals by aquatic and terrestrial plants. Int J Phytoremediation 3:13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nzengung VA, Lee NW, Rennels DE, McCutcheon SC, Wang C (1999) Use of aquatic plants and algae for decontamination of waters polluted with chlorinated alkanes. Int J Phytoremediation 1:203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Parvaiz A, Maryam S, Satyawati S (2008) Reactive oxygen species, antioxidants and signaling in plants. J Plant Biol 51:167–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pavlostathis SG, Comstock KK, Jacobson ME, Saunders FM (1998) Transformation of 2,4,6-trinitrotoluene by the aquatic plant Myriophyllum aquaticum. Environ Toxicol Chem 17:2266Google Scholar
  47. Petrucio MM, Esteves FA (2000) Uptake rates of nitrogen and phosphorus in water by Eichhornia crassipes and Salvinia auriculata. Rev Braz Biol 10:229–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Popa K, Palamaru MN, Iordan AR, Humelnicu D, Drochioiu G, Cecal A (2006) Laboratory analyses of 60Co2+, 65Zn2+ and (55+59)Fe3+ radioactions uptake by Lemna minor. Isotopes Environ Health Stud 42:87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rao TP, Ito O, Matsunga R (1993) Differences in uptake kinetics of ammonium and nitrate in legumes and cereals. Plant Soil 154:67–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Reidenbach G, Horst WJ (1997) Nitrate-uptake capacity of different root zones of Zea mays (L.) in vitro and in situ. Plant Soil 196:295–300CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Rice PJ, Anderson TA, Coats JR (1997) Phytoremediation of herbicide-contaminated surface water with aquatic plants. In: Kruger EL, Anderson TA, Coats JR (eds) Phytoremediation of soil and water contaminants. American Chemical Society, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  52. Sandermann H (1992) Plant metabolism of xenobiotics. Trends Biochem Sci 17:82–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Sandermann H (1994) Higher plant metabolism of xenobiotics: the green liver concept. Pharmacogenetics 4:225–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Schnoor JL, Licht LA, McCutcheon SC, Wolfe NL, Carreira LH (1995) Phytoremediation of organic and nutrient contaminants. Environ Sci Technol 29:318–323Google Scholar
  55. Shimp JF, Tracy JC, Davis LC, Lee E, Huang W, Erickson LE, Schnoor JL (1993) Beneficial effects of plants in the remediation of soil and groundwater contaminated with organic materials. Crit Rev Environ Sci Technol 23:41–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Susarla S, Medina VF, McCutcheon SC (2002) Phytoremediation: an ecological solution to organic chemical contamination. Ecol Eng 18:647–658Google Scholar
  57. Tangahu BV, Abdullah SRS, Basri H, Idris M, Anuar N, Mukhlisin M (2011) A review on heavy metals (As, Pb, and Hg) uptake by plants through phytoremediation. Int J Chem Eng 2011:939161. doi: 10.1155/2011/939161, 31 pCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Van Aken B, Correa PA, Schnoor JL (2010) Phytoremediation of polychlorinated biphenyls: new trends and promises. Environ Sci Technol 44(8):2767–2776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Vymazal J, Kropfelova L (2008) Wastewater treatment in constructed wetlands with horizontal sub-surface flow, vol 14, Environmental pollution. Springer, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wallace IS, Choi WG, Roberts DM (2006) The structure, function and regulation of the nodulin 26-like intrinsic protein family of plant aquaglyceroporins. Biochimica Biophyica Acta 1758:1165–1175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Wang C, Liu ZQ (2007) Foliar uptake of pesticides: present status and future challenge. Pest Biochem Physiol 87:1–8Google Scholar
  62. Zhao F, McGrath SP, Meharg AA (2010) Arsenic as a food chain contaminant: mechanisms of plant uptake and metabolism and mitigation strategies. Ann Rev Plant Biol 61:535–559CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zhu T, Sikora FJ (1994) Ammonium and nitrate removal in vegetated and unvegetated gravel bed microcosm wetlands. In: Proceedings of 4th international conference on wetland systems for water pollution control, ICWS’94, Secretariat, Guangzhou, People’s Republic of China, pp 355–366Google Scholar
  64. Zhu YG, Smolders E (2000) Plant uptake of radiocaesium: a review of mechanisms, regulation and application. J Exp Bot 51(351):1635–1645CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Zhu YG, Shaw G, Nisbet AF, Wilkins BT (2000) Effect of potassium starvation on the uptake of radiocaesium by spring wheat (Triticum aestivum cv. Tonic). Plant Soil 220:27–34CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Bhupinder Dhir
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of GeneticsUniversity of Delhi South CampusNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations