Plant–Microbe Interaction: A Potential Tool for Enhanced Bioremediation



A number of toxic and synthetic organic compounds are a problem worldwide because they can contaminate environmental soil through either local (e.g., industrial) or diffuse (e.g., agricultural) contamination. These pollutants have negative effects on environment as well as human health. In order to clean the polluted sites, the search for alternative methods for excavation and incineration resulted in the application of bioremediation techniques. Rhizoremediation is a specific form of phytoremediation and bioaugmentation that could be applied to solve the problems encountered by the application of these techniques individually. During rhizoremediation, root exudates stimulate the survival and action of bacteria, which subsequently result in efficient degradation of pollutants. The root system of plants can help bacteria to spread through soil and penetrate even impermeable soil layers. The main contributors for rhizoremediation include endophytic and rhizospheric bacteria. These bacteria have potential for improving bioremediation of toxic organic compounds in contaminated sites. The efficiency of phytoremediation or bioaugmentation can be improved by inoculation of pollutant-degrading bacteria on plant seed.


Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Root Exudate Methyl Tertiary Butyl Ether Endophytic Bacterium Plant Growth Promote Rhizobacteria 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Abhilash PC, Powell RJ, Singh HB, Singh BK (2012) Plant–microbe interactions: novel applications for exploitation in multipurpose remediation technologies. Trends Biotechnol 30:416–420PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson TA, Guthrine EA, Walton BT (1993) Bioremediation in the rhizosphere. Environ Sci Technol 2:2630–2636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Atlas RM, Bartha R (1998) Microbial ecology: fundamentals and application, 3rd edn. Benjamin Cummings Publishing Company, Menlo Park, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  4. Banks MK, Mallede H, Rathbone K (2003) Rhizosphere microbial characterization in petroleum-contaminated soil. Soil Sediment Contam 12:371–385CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brazil GM, Kenefick L, Callanan M, Haro A, de Lorenzo V, Dowling DN, O’Gara F (1995) Construction of a rhizosphere pseudomonad with potential to degrade polychlorinated biphenyls and detection of bph gene expression in the rhizosphere. Appl Environ Microbiol 61:1946–1952PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Cai M, Xun L (2002) Organization and regulation of pentachlorophenol-degrading genes in Sphingobium chlorophenolicum ATCC 39723. J Bacteriol 184:4672–4680PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cerniglia CE (1993) Biodegradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Curr Opin Biotechnol 4:331–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chaudhry Q, Blom-Zandstra M, Gupta S, Joner EJ (2005) Utilising the synergy between plants and rhizosphere microorganisms to enhance breakdown of organic pollutants in the environment. Environ Sci Pollut Res 12:34–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Erickson LE (1997) An overview of research on the beneficial effects of vegetation in contaminated soil. N Y Acad Sci 829:30–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Furukawa K (2003) Super bugs for bioremediation. Trends Biotechnol 21:187–190PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Germaine KJ, Keogh E, Ryan D, Dowling DN (2009) Bacterial endophyte-mediated naphthalene phytoprotection and phytoremediation. FEMS Microbiol Lett 296:226–234PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Greenberg BM (2006) Development and field tests of a multi-process phytoremediation system for decontamination of soils. Can Reclam 1:27–29Google Scholar
  13. Hartmann A, Schmid M, Tuinen D, Berg G (2009) Plant-driven selection of microbes. Plant Soil 321:235–257CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hrywna Y, Tsoi TV, Maltseva OV, Quensen JF, Tiedje JM (1999) Construction and characterization of two recombinant bacteria that grow on ortho- and para-substituted chlorobiphenyls. Appl Environ Microbiol 65:2163PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Kielak P, Prieto-Fernandez A, Monterroso C, Acea M (2008) Differences in vegetation composition and plant species identity lead to only minor changes in soil borne microbial communities in former arable field. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 63:372–382PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kuiper I, Lagendijk EL, Bloemberg GV, Lugtenberg BJJ (2004) Rhizoremediation: a beneficial plant-microbe interaction. Mol Plant Microbe Interact 17:6–15PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Licht LA, Isebrands JG (2005) Linking phytoremediated pollutant removal to biomass economic opportunities. Biomass Bioenerg 28:203–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Livhuwani PR (2009) Rhizosphere microbial diversity in PAH’s contaminated and uncontaminated soil. Dissertation, University of Pretoria, PretoriaGoogle Scholar
  19. Lodewyckx C, Vangronsveld J, Porteus F, Moore ERB, Taghavi S, van der Lelie D (2002) Endophytic bacteria and their potential application. Crit Rev Plant Sci 6:583–606CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Louisa WP (2010) Review: in situ and bioremediation of organic pollutants in aquatic sediments. J Hazard Mater 177:81–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Magar CS (2001) Natural recovery of contaminated sediments. J Environ Eng 127:24–29Google Scholar
  22. Marihal AK, Jagadeesh KS, Sinha S (2009a) Biodegradation of PCP by the rhizobacteria isolated from pentachlorophenol-tolerant crop species. Int J Environ Sci Eng 1(4):189–193Google Scholar
  23. Marihal K, Avita KS, Jagadeesh, Sinha S (2009b) Plant growth promotional activities of PCP degrading bacteria. In: First Asian PGPR congress for sustainable agriculture, Hyderabad, p 107Google Scholar
  24. McGuinness M, Dowling D (2009) Plant-associated bacterial degradation of toxic organic compounds in soil. Int J Environ Res Public Health 6:2226–2247PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Morgan P, Watkinson RJ (1989) Hydrocarbon degradation in soils and method for soil biotreatment. Crit Rev Biotechnol 8:305–333PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Panteleyev AA, Bickers DR (2006) Dioxin-induced chloracne – reconstructing the cellular and molecular mechanisms of a classic environmental disease. Exp Dermatol 15:705–730PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Porteus-Moore F, Barac T, Borremans B, Oeyen L, Vangronsveld J, van der Lelie D, Campbell D, Moore ERB (2006) Endophytic bacterial diversity in poplar trees growing on a BTEX-contaminated site: the characterization of isolates with potential to enhance phytoremediation. Syst Appl Microbiol 29:539–556CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Rentz JA, Alvarez PJJ, Schnoor JL (2004) Repression of Pseudomonas putida phenanthrene-degrading activity by plant root extracts and exudates. Environ Microbiol 6:574–583PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Rodriguez-Navarro DN, Dardanelli MS, Ruiz-Sainz JE (2007) Attachment of bacteria to the roots of higher plants. FEMS Microbiol Lett 272:127–136PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Schwab AP, Banks MK (1994) Biologically mediated dissipation of polyaromatic hydrocarbons in the root zone. In: Bioremediation through rhizosphere technology. American Society of Microbiology, Washington, DC, pp 132–141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Segura A, Rodriguez-Conde S, Ramos C, Ramos JL (2009) Bacterial responses and interactions with plants during rhizoremediation. Microb Biotechnol 2:452–464PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Shukla KP, Sharma S, Singh NK, Singh V, Tiwari K, Singh S (2011) Nature and role of root exudates: efficacy in bioremediation. Afr J Biotechnol 10(48):9717–9724Google Scholar
  33. Skaare J, Larsen HJ, Lie E, Bernhoft A, Derocher AE, Norstrom R, Ropstad E, Lunn NF, Wiig O (2002) Ecological risk assessment of persistent organic pollutants in the Arctic. Toxicology 181:193–197PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Susarla S, Medina VF, McCutcheon SC (2002) Phytoremediation: an ecological solution to organic chemical contamination. Ecol Eng 18:647–658CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Van Aken B, Peres C, Doty S, Yoon J, Schnoor J (2004) Methylobacterium populi sp. nov., a novel aerobic, pink-pigmented, facultative methylotrophic, methane-utilising bacterium isolated from poplar trees (Populus deltoids x nigra DN34). Evol Microbiol 54:1191–1196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Van Aken B, Yoon J, Schnoor J (2005) Biodegradation of nitro-substituted explosives 2, 4, 6-trinitrotoluene, hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazine inside poplar tissues (Populus deltoids × nigra DN34). Appl Environ Microbiol 70:508–517CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Weyens N, Van der Lelie D, Taghavi S, Vangronsveld J (2009) Phytoremediation: plant-endophyte partnerships take the challenge. Curr Opin Biotechnol 20:248–254PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Yanhong ZHU, Shuzhen Z, Honglin H, Bei W (2009) Effects of maize root exudates and organic acids on the desorption of phenanthrene from soils. J Environ Sci 21:920–926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Zalesny RS Jr, Bauer EO (2007) Selecting and utilizing populus and salix for landfill covers: implications for leachate irrigation. Int J Phytoremediat 9:497–511CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Agricultural MicrobiologyUniversity of Agricultural SciencesDharwadIndia

Personalised recommendations