Software Reliability and Operational Profile

  • Ajeet Kumar Pandey
  • Neeraj Kumar Goyal
Part of the Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing book series (STUDFUZZ, volume 303)


Software testing (both development and regression) is costly and therefore must be conducted in a planned and systematic way to optimize overall testing objectives. One of the key objectives is to assure the reliability of software system that needs an extensive testing. To plan and guide software testing, the very first requirement is to find the number of tests (size) and thereafter allocationg the tests to various functions/modules. This chapter presents a model based approach to plan, guide, and allocate test cases to achieve more reliable system.


Function Point Functional Complexity Operational Profile Electronic Control Unit Test Case Generation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Arora, S., Misra, R. B., & Kumre, V. M. (2005). Software reliability improvement through operational profile driven testing. In Proceedings of Annual IEEE Conference on Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (pp. 621–627). Virginia.Google Scholar
  2. Fenton, E., & Neil, M. (1998). Software metrics: Successes, failures and new directions. UK: Centre for Software Reliability, City University.Google Scholar
  3. Jones, C. (1997). Software Productivity Research, Inc. Software Estimating Rules of Thumb, Version 1.Google Scholar
  4. Koziolek, H. (2005). Operational profiles for software reliability. Germany: Seminar on Dependability Engineering.Google Scholar
  5. Musa, J. D. (1993). Operational profiles in software reliability engineering. IEEE Software Magazine.Google Scholar
  6. Musa, J. D. (2005). Software reliability engineering: More reliable software faster and cheaper (2nd ed.). New York: Tata McGraw-Hill Publication.Google Scholar
  7. Musa, J. D., Iannino, A., & Okumoto, K. (1987). Software reliability: Measurement, prediction, and application. New York: McGraw-Hill Publication.Google Scholar
  8. Oligny, S., Desharnais, J., & Abran, A. (1998a). Functional size of real time software: Overview of field test. UAQM’s Software Engineering Management Research Laboratory.Google Scholar
  9. Oligny, S., Desharnais, J., & Abran, A. (1998b). A method for measuring the functional size of embedded software. UAQM’s Software Engineering Management Research Laboratory.Google Scholar
  10. Symons, C. R. (1988). Function point analysis: Difficulties and improvements. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 14(1), 2–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.AECOM India Private LimitedHyderabadIndia
  2. 2.Reliability Engineering CentreIndian Institute of Technology KharagpurKharagpurIndia

Personalised recommendations