Geology of the K1 and K2 Kimberlite Pipes at Murowa, Zimbabwe

  • Stephen Moss
  • Kimberley Webb
  • Casey Hetman
  • Ammiel Manyumbu
Conference paper


The Murowa kimberlite field includes three kimberlite pipes and multiple kimberlite dykes that have been emplaced into the Archaen Chibi granite batholith north of the Limpopo Belt in south-central Zimbabwe. Here we describe the geology of the two largest kimberlite pipes: K1 and K2. Observations of drill core, thin section petrography, and mapping of exposed rocks at the Murowa Diamond Mine are used to describe the internal geology and these data form the basis for three-dimensional geological models of each body. The modeled pipe geometries are combined with observed cross-cutting relationships and textural variations among deposits to interpret the nature of emplacement. K1 is an irregular-shaped, multi-lobed kimberlite pipe occupied by volcaniclastic and coherent kimberlite, and enveloped by kimberlite-poor country-rock granite breccias and volcaniclastic rocks. K1 is interpreted to result from multiple emplacement events, involving kimberlite magmas with varying proportions of gas, liquid and solid phases encountering country rock with different amounts of previous fracturing and brecciation, and intruding/erupting over contrasting timescales. K2 is a steep-sided, sub-circular pipe which flares slightly with depth and is dominantly infilled by massive coherent kimberlite. The textural characteristics of the infill preserved in K2 indicate a less explosive emplacement style relative to K1. Observations of pipe shape, deposits along the pipe margins, and textural modification form the basis for interpreting the relative stage of volcanic development, or ‘maturity’, of K1 compared to some other kimberlites. Designations of pipe maturity acknowledge the uniqueness of kimberlite occurrences, and have implications for interpreting the explosivity and duration of kimberlite eruptions, and for resource modeling of kimberlite pipes.


Country Rock Kimberlite Pipe Kimberlite Magma Pipe Shape Volcaniclastic Kimberlite 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



The authors would like to thank Rio Tinto PLC and RioZim for access to resources for this study and for permission to publish. Discussions with Kelly Russell, David Eichenberg, Chris Smith, Andy Davy, and Murray Rayner have greatly benefitted this project. The paper was also greatly assisted from helpful and constructive reviews by Tom Gernon and Hugh O’Brien.


  1. Barnett W (2004) Subsidence breccias in kimberlite pipes—an application of fractal analysis. Lithos 76(1–4):299–316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brady AE, Moore KR (2012) A mantle-derived dolomite silicocarbonatite from the southwest coast of Ireland. Mineral Mag 76(2):357–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Brown R, Kavanagh J, Sparks RSJ, Tait M, Field M (2007) Mechanically disrupted and chemically weakened zones in segmented dyke systems cause vent localization: evidence from kimberlite volcanic systems. Geology 35(9):815–818CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown R, Tait M, Field M, Sparks R (2009) Geology of a complex kimberlite pipe (K2 pipe, Venetia Mine, South Africa): insights into conduit processes during explosive ultrabasic eruptions. Bull Volcanol 71(1):95–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bryant DG (1968) Intrusive breccias associated with ore, Warren (Bisbee) mining district. Arizon Econ Geol 63(1):1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buse B, Sparks R, Field M, Schumacher J, Chisi K, Tlhaodi T (2011) Geology of the BK9 kimberlite (Damtshaa, Botswana): implications for the formation of dark volcaniclastic kimberlite. Bull Volcanol 73(8):1029–1045CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Clement CR (1982) A comparative geological study of some major kimberlite pipes in the Northern Cape and Orange Free State. Unpublished Ph.D., 2 vols, thesis, University of Cape TownGoogle Scholar
  8. Clement CR, Reid AM (1989) The origin of kimberlite pipes: an interpretation based on a synthesis of geological features displayed by southern African occurrences. In: Ross J (ed) Kimberlites and Related Rocks. Geological Society of Australia Special Publication, Geological Society of Australia, pp 632–646Google Scholar
  9. Cloos H (1941) Bau und Tatigkeit von Tuffschloten. Untersuchengen and dem Schabischen Vulkan. Vulkan Geol Rdsch 32:709–800CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Field M, Scott S BH (1999) Contrasting geology and near-surface emplacement of kimberlite pipes in southern Africa and Canada, VIIth international kimberlite conference. Red Roof Designs, Cape Town, South Africa, pp 214–237Google Scholar
  11. Field M, Gibson JG, Wilkes TA, Gababotse J, Khutjwe P (1997) The geology of the Orapa A/K1 kimberlite Botswana: further insights into the emplacement of kimberlite pipes. Russ Geol Geophys 38(1):24–39Google Scholar
  12. Field M, Stiefenhofer J, Robey J, Kurszlaukis S (2008) Kimberlite-hosted diamond deposits of southern Africa: a review. Ore Geol Rev 34(1–2):33–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fitzgerald CE, Hetman CM, Lepine I, Skelton DS, McCandless TE (2009) The internal geology and emplacement history of the Renard 2 kimberlite, Superior Province, Quebec, Canada. Lithos 112 (Suppl 1):513–528Google Scholar
  14. Galloway M, Nowicki T, van Coller B, Mukodzani B, Siemens K, Hetman C, Webb K, Gurney J (2009) Constraining kimberlite geology through integration of geophysical, geological and geochemical methods: a case study of the Mothae kimberlite, northern Lesotho. Lithos 112(Suppl 1):130–141Google Scholar
  15. Gernon T, Gilbertson M, Sparks RSJ, Field M (2008) Gas-fluidisation in an experimental tapered bed: insights into processes in diverging volcanic conduits. J Volcanol Geoth Res 174(1–3):49–56CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hetman CM (2008) Tuffisitic kimberlite (TK): a Canadian perspective on a distinctive textural variety of kimberlite. J Volcanol Geoth Res 174(1–3):57–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hetman CH, Scott Smith BH, Paul JL, Winter F (2004) Geology of the Gahcho Kue’ kimberlite pipes, NWT, Canada: Root to diatreme magmatic transition zones. Lithos 76:51–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jébrak M (1997) Hydrothermal breccias in vein-type ore deposits: a review of mechanisms, morphology and size distribution. Ore Geol Rev 12(3):111–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kurzslaukis S, Buttner R, Zimanowski B, Lorenz V (1998) On the first experimental phreatomagmatic explosion of a kimberlite melt. J Volcanol Geoth Res 80:323–326CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lorenz V, Zimanowski B, Buettner R (2002) On the formation of deep-seated subterranean peperite-like magma–sediment mixtures. J Volcanol Geoth Res 114(1–2):107–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. McCallum ME (1985) Experimental evidence for fluidization processes in breccia pipe formation. Econ Geol 80:1523–1543CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Moss S, Russell J (2011) Fragmentation in kimberlite: products and intensity of explosive eruption. Bull Volcanol 73(8):983–1003CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Moss S, Russell JK, Andrews GDM (2008) Progressive infilling of a kimberlite pipe at Diavik, Northwest Territories, Canada: insights from volcanic facies architecture, textures, and granulometry. J Volcanol Geoth Res 174(1–3):103–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Moss S, Russell JK, Brett RC, Andrews GDM (2009) Spatial and temporal evolution of kimberlite magma at A154 N, Diavik, Northwest Territories, Canada. Lithos 112 Supplement 1(0):541–552Google Scholar
  25. Noguchi S, Toramaru A, Nakada S (2008) Groundmass crystallization in dacite dykes taken in Unzen Scientific Drilling Project (USDP-4). J Volcanol Geoth Res 175(1–2):71–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Porritt LA, Cas RAF, Crawford BB (2008) In-vent column collapse as an alternative model for massive volcaniclastic kimberlite emplacement: an example from the Fox kimberlite, Ekati diamond mine, NWT, Canada. J Volcanol Geoth Res 174(1–3):90–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Scott Smith BH (2008) Canadian kimberlites: geological characteristics relevant to emplacement. J Volcanol Geoth Res 174(1–3):9–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Scott Smith BH, Smith SCS (2009) The economic implications of kimberlite emplacement. Lithos 112:10–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Scott Smith BH, Nowicki TE, Russell JK, Webb KJ, Mitchell RH, Hetman CM, Harder M, Skinner EMW, Robey JV (2012) Kimberlite terminology and classification. 10IKC Long Abstracts, 10IKC-226:5Google Scholar
  30. Sillitoe RH (1985) Ore-related breccias in volcanoplutonic arcs. Econ Geol 80(6):1467–1514CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Skinner EMW, Marsh JS (2004) Distinct kimberlite pipe classes with contrasting eruption processes. Lithos 76(1–4):183–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Smith CB, Sims K, Chimuka L, Duffin A, Beard A, Townend R (2004) Kimberlite metasomatism at Murowa and Sese pipes, Zimbabwe. Lithos 76(1–4):219–232CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Sparks RSJ, Baker L, Brown RJ, Field M, Schumacher J, Stripp G, Walters A (2006) Dynamical constraints on kimberlite volcanism. J Volcanol Geoth Res 155(1–2):18–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Stasiuk MV, Barclay J, Carroll MR, Jaupart C, Ratté JC, Sparks RSJ, Tait SR (1996) Degassing during magma ascent in the Mule Creek vent (USA). Bull Volcanol 58(2):117–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Stoppa F, Rosatelli G (2009) Ultramafic intrusion triggers hydrothermal explosions at Colle Fabbri (Spoleto, Umbria), Italy. J Volcanol Geoth Res 187(1–2):85–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Tuffen H, Dingwell DB, Pinkerton H (2003) Repeated fracture and healing of silicic magma generate flow banding and earthquakes? Geology 31(12):1089–1092CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Wilson L, Head JW III (2007) An integrated model of kimberlite ascent and eruption. Nature 447(7140):53–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Geological Society of India 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephen Moss
    • 1
  • Kimberley Webb
    • 1
  • Casey Hetman
    • 3
  • Ammiel Manyumbu
    • 2
  1. 1.Mineral Services CanadaNorth VancouverCanada
  2. 2.RioTintoLondonUK
  3. 3.SRKVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations