Abstract
As a result of multiple issues, alluvial diamond properties are often considered more difficult to evaluate than many other deposit types. This is frequently combined with the perception that only large-scale deposits can be evaluated professionally; that evaluations and, subsequent, valuations of small-medium scale operations are either inherently flawed or cannot be done at all. However, a discussion of resource estimation and valuation methods shows that, despite both real and perceived risks, alluvial diamond projects of all scales can be evaluated to the same international standards in a financially responsible manner. Once the site has been established, bulk-sampling and drilling programmes can be designed to estimate the diamond resources present on the property. It has to be appreciated that, due to the often low, but highly variable, grades and geological inhomogeneity of these deposits, significantly more prospecting may need to be completed to estimate resources when compared with many other commodities, as unsubstantiated assumptions can be misleading. The resource estimation programme is designed to identify the volume of gravel present on the property that may be mineable, the average recoverable grade and the average sales value of the diamonds. This can only be accomplished by the processing of significant volumes of gravel through bulk-sampling. During trial-mining exercises, which are comparable to (pre-) feasibility studies, considerable mining and processing data is obtained—the “modifying factors” required to convert mineral resources to mineral reserves. As with any other commodity, the value of an alluvial diamond deposit changes as market conditions change and according to the amount of information available for the project. Consequently, different valuation approaches will be valid at different stages of the project. Where reserves have been identified, standard Discounted Cash Flow (“DCF”) methods of valuation apply. However, few alluvial diamond deposits get evaluated to this stage and Income-based approaches are not appropriate for properties without mineral resources. By contrast, Cost and Market approaches, which are often used in early stage project valuation, are generally not good indicators of value of alluvial diamond projects either.
An erratum to this chapter can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1173-0_20
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Ashworth PJ, Best JL, Peakall J, Lorsong JA (1999) The influence of aggradation rate on braided alluvial architecture: field study and physical scale-modelling of the Ashburton River gravels, Canterbury Plains, New Zealand. Spec Publs Int Assoc Sediment 28:333–346
Baurens S (2010) Valuation of metals and mining companies. A document produced in collaboration with the University of Zurich, Swiss Banking Institute and Prof T Hens, 81 pp
CIM (2008) Estimation of mineral resources and mineral reserves best practice guidelines. Canadian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy,Westmount, May 4, 2008
Damodaran A (2008) What is the risk-free rate? A search for the basic building block. Stern School of Business, New York University, New York
Germanoski D, Schumm SA (1993) Changes in braided river morphology resulting from aggradation and degradation. J Geol 101:451–466
Jacob RJ (2005) The erosional and cainozoic depositional history of the lower orange river, south-western Africa. Ph.D. thesis, University of Glasgow, 167 pp
Lattanzi CR (2002) Discounted cash flow analysis input parameters and sensitivity. Mining millennium valuation 2000, Special session on valuation of mineral properties, Mar 8, 2000, Toronto, Canada, 13 pp
Lawrence RD (2002) Valuation of mineral properties without mineral resources: a review of market-based approaches. Mining millennium valuation 2000, Special session on valuation of mineral properties, Mar 8, 2000, Toronto, Canada, 7 pp
Lilford EV, Minnit RCA (2002) Methodologies in the valuation of mineral rights. J SAIMM 105:369–384
Lock N (2003) Comparing carats to kilograms. Mining Mirror, Oct 2003, pp 36–38
Macfarlane AS (2002) A Code for the valuation of mineral properties and projects in South Africa. J SAIMM 12:37–48
Mcmahon F, Cervantes M (2011) Survey of mining companies 2010/2011. Fraser Institute Annual, p 100. www.fraserinstitute.org
Oosterveld MM (1972) Ore reserve estimation and depletion planning for a beach diamond deposits. In: Proceedings of tenth international symposium on the application of computers in the mineral industry, Johannesburg, 7 pp
Oosterveld MM (2008) Wouterspan, Holpan and Klipdam, Saxendrift—size frequency and large stones for 2005–2008 period. Internal report for Rockwell Ventures Inc (2008)
Phillips R (1971) A method for estimating the grade of diamond deposits. Inst Min Metall B3:57–362
PWC (2011) Mine 2011. The Game has changed. Review of global trends in the mining industry, p 52. www.pwc.com/mining
Rombouts L (1987) Evaluation of low grade/high value diamond deposits. Mining Magazine, pp 217–220
Roscoe WE (2002) Valuation of mineral exploration properties using the cost approach. Mining millennium valuation 2000, Special session on valuation of mineral properties, Mar 8, 2000, Toronto, Canada, p 11
SAMREC (2009) South African code for reporting of mineral resources and mineral reserves. Prepared by the South African Mineral Resources Committee (SAMREC), under the auspices of the South African Institute of Mining and Metallurgy (SAIMM). 2007 Edition, as amended Jul 2009
Sichel HS (1972) Statistical valuation of diamondiferous deposits. In: Proceedings of tenth international symposium on the application of computers in the mineral industry, Johannesburg, p 9
Smith LD (2002) Discounted cash flow analysis methodology and discount rates. Mining millennium valuation 2000, Special session on valuation of mineral properties, Mar 8, 2000, Toronto, Canada, p 9
Spence K (2002) An overview of valuation practice and the development of a Canadian code for the valuation of mineral properties. Mining millennium valuation 2000, Special session on valuation of mineral properties, Mar 8, 2000, Toronto, Canada, p 9
Thompson IS (2002) A critique of valuation methods for exploration properties and undeveloped mineral resources. Mining millennium valuation 2000, Special session on valuation of mineral properties, Mar 8, 2000, Toronto, Canada, p 12
Acknowledgments
The author would like to express appreciation for the comments by Dr M C J de Wit, an anonymous referee and Dr H Grütter (10IKC Guest Editor), which greatly improved the manuscript. Further, I would like to acknowledge the many formal and informal discussions with prospectors, miners, legislators, academics and other Competent/Qualified Persons held over the years in an attempt to bring the alluvial diamond industry kicking and screaming into the twenty-first century. Finally, many thanks are also due to Mrs Di du Toit (DuoDraft CC) for drafting the diagrams.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Geological Society of India
About this paper
Cite this paper
Marshall, T.R. (2013). Resource Estimation and Valuation of Alluvial Diamond Deposits. In: Pearson, D., et al. Proceedings of 10th International Kimberlite Conference. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1173-0_18
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1173-0_18
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi
Print ISBN: 978-81-322-1172-3
Online ISBN: 978-81-322-1173-0
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)