Advertisement

Agricultural Trade with Production Uncertainty

  • Debasmita Basu
  • Abhirup Sarkar
Chapter

Abstract

Uncertainty in agricultural production resulting in loss of natural insurance works against standard gains from trade through comparative advantage. The strength of these two forces determine the final effect of trade on welfare. Even when comparative advantage effects are not strong enough such that free trade is worse than autarky, there exists a tax-subsidy scheme which with trade always makes the country better off than autarky in the absence of an insurance market. Countries with strong comparative advantage in industrial goods where production is less uncertain have no reason to restrict agricultural trade. Countries with strong comparative advantage for agricultural goods have reasons for government intervention which provides insurance. For all countries, some trade (free or restricted) is better than no trade.

Keywords

Free Trade Comparative Advantage World Trade Organization Insurance Market Small Open Economy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Batra, R. N., & Russel, W. R. (1974). Gains from trade under uncertainty. American Economic Review, 64(6), 1040–1048.Google Scholar
  2. Eaton, J. (1979). The allocation of resources in an open economy with uncertain terms of trade. International Economic Review, 20(2), 391–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Grossman, G. M., & Razin, A. (1985). Direct foreign investment and the choice of technique under uncertainty. Oxford Economic Papers, 37(4), 606–620.Google Scholar
  4. Helpman, E., and Razin, A. The Allocation of Resources in an Open Economy with Uncertain Terms of Trade. Academic Press, 1978Google Scholar
  5. Kemp, M. C., & Liviatan, N. (1973, June). Production and trade patterns under uncertainty. The Economic Record, 49(126), 215–227.Google Scholar
  6. Mayer, W. (1984). Endogenous tariff formation. American Economic Review, 74(5), 970–985.Google Scholar
  7. Miranda, M. J., & Glauber, J. W. (1997). Systemic risk, reinsurance, and the failure of crop insurance markets. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 79(1), 206–215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Newbery, D. M. G., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1981). Pareto inferior trade. The Review of Economic Studies, 51(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ruffin, R. J. (1974). International trade under uncertainty. Journal of International Economics, 4(3), 243–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Shy, O. (1988). A general equilibrium model of Pareto Inferior Trade. Journal of International Economics, 51(1–2), 143–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Swinnen, J. (1994). A positive theory of agricultural protection. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 76(1), 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Turnovsky, S. J. (1974). Technological and price uncertainty in a Ricardian Model of International Trade. The Review of Economic Studies, 41(2), 201–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Economic Research UnitIndian Statistical InstituteKolkataIndia

Personalised recommendations