Advertisement

“Antitrust Policy” Versus “Industrial Policy”

  • Makoto Yano
  • Takakazu Honryo
  • Fumio Dei
Chapter

Abstract

Put in the context of international trade, what is viewed as an industrial policy in the existing literature may be thought of as a type of antitrust policy to seek for a beggar-thy-neighbor effect by permitting (or promoting) its manufacturing sector to take anti-competitive actions. This study demonstrates that in order to retaliate against such an industrial policy, a country may suppress competition in its service sector. For this purpose, we build a simple partial equilibrium version of the Sanyal-Jones model and demonstrate that a state in which a country suppresses competition in its manufacturing sector at the same time that its trading partner country suppresses competition in its service sector can be supported as a Nash equilibrium. In our setting, antitrust policy on the service sector is an effective policy tool only for retaliation. In other words, perfect competition can be maintained throughout the world unless the exporting country adopts an anti-competitive industrial policy, thereby triggering a retaliatory action.

Keywords

Nash Equilibrium Industrial Policy Competition Policy Final Consumption Cournot Competition 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Brander, J., & Spencer, B. (1985). Exports subsidies and international market share rivalry. Journal of International Economics, 18, 83–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. De Stefano, M., & Rysman, M. (2010). Competition policy as strategic trade with differentiated products. Review of International Economics, 18, 758–771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Feenstra, R. C. (2004). Advanced International Trade: Theory and Evidence. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
  4. Francois, J., & Horn, H. (2006). “Anti-trust in open economies,” Tinbergen Institute discussion paper TI 2006-006/2.Google Scholar
  5. Horn, H., & Levinsohn, J. (2001). Merger policies and trade liberalization. Economic Journal, 111, 244–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Honryo, T., & Yano, M. (2006). Short-run trade surplus creation in a two-sector setting. Japanese Economic Review, 57, 476–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Komiya, R., Okuno, M., & Suzumura, K. (1988). Industrial policy of Japan. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  8. Ma, Y. (2009). Trade theorems in a model of vertical production chain. International Review of Economics & Finance, 18, 70–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Ota, R. (2006). Adjustability in production and dynamic effects of domestic competition policy. Journal of International Trade and Economic Development, 15, 431–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Richardson, M. (1999). Trade and competition policies: concordia discors? Oxford Economic Papers, 51, 649–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Sanyal, K., & Jones, R. (1982). The theory of trade in middle products. American Economic Review, 72, 16–31.Google Scholar
  12. Takahashi, R. (2005). Domestic competition policy and tariff policy compared. Japanese Economic Review, 56, 210–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Takahashi R., Kenzaki, J. & Yano, M. (2008). Competition policy as a substitute for tariff policy. In S. Marjit & E. Yu (Eds.), Contemporary and Emerging Issues in Trade Theory and Policy (pp. 397–415). Bingley: Emerald.Google Scholar
  14. Yano, M. (2001). Trade imbalance and domestic market competition policy. International Economic Review, 42, 729–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Yano, M., & Dei, F. (2003). Trade, vertical production chain, and competition policy. Review of International Economics, 11, 237–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Yano, M., & Dei, F. (2004). Optimal competition policy in a model of vertical production chain. In S. Katayama & H. W. Ursprung (Eds.), International economic policies in a globalized world (pp. 163–175). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  17. Yano, M., & Dei, F. (2007). International game of domestic competition policies. Journal of Economics of Kwansei Gakuin University, 60, 15–27.Google Scholar
  18. Yano, M., & Honryo, T. (2010). Trade imbalances and harmonization of competition policies. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 46, 438–452.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Yano, M., & Honryo, T. (2011a). Fundamental difficulty underlying international harmonization of competition policies. International Journal of Economic Theory, 7, 111–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Yano, M., & Honryo, T. (2011b). A two-country game of competition policies. Review of International Economics, 19, 207–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Yano, M., Takahashi, R., & Kenzaki, J. (2006). Competition policy or tariff policy: Which is more effective? Asia-Pacific Journal of Accounting and Economics, 13, 163–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Economic ResearchKyoto University, Yoshida-Honmachi, Sakyo-kuKyotoJapan
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsUniversity of ManheimMannheimGermany
  3. 3.Graduate School of Business AdministrationKobe UniversityKobeJapan

Personalised recommendations