Skip to main content

Middle Products Revisited

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Trade, Globalization and Development
  • 1170 Accesses

Abstract

Kalyan Sanyal was a great student in the Ph.D. program at the University of Rochester in the early 1980s. He was interested in the general phenomenon of international trade in intermediate commodities. At an early stage we had many discussions about where trade should be positioned in the productive spectrum, and our answer was: “In the middle” – some production takes place before trade and some afterwards, hence the “middle products” designation. In this paper I review the major points in our earlier work, and place it in position with what could be considered its pre-cursors and then how, in the past 30 years, economists have taken more seriously the importance of trade in “middle products”, both in terms of new theory about fragmentation and outsourcing and in the mounting evidence that trade in parts and components have shown the most rapid rates of growth. Sanyal’s other work continued this investigation, often with an early use of the “continuum” concept, which has received wide use in more recent research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    As noted later, the use of the specific factors model in the Input Tier allows the analysis if many middle products are produced in that Tier to be almost as simple as only having a single production activity in the Input Tier.

  2. 2.

    Any increase in L I would result in an outward shift of the transformation curve in the Input Tier.

  3. 3.

    The elasticity of supply is shown as the coefficient of the relative price change in equation (A7) on p. 29 of our AER article.

  4. 4.

    In equation (A7), the numerator would just be the expression (δ L + δ T).

  5. 5.

    The numerator in (A7) expands to [δ L + δ T + θ LIγI/θ L0], with the θ expressions reflecting distributive factor shares and the expression for the elasticity of demand for labor in the Input Tier given by γ I .

  6. 6.

    See Jones (1975).

  7. 7.

    This supply–demand diagram is Fig. 5 in the original AER article.

  8. 8.

    My own paper developed from the job I had refereeing the Kemp paper.

  9. 9.

    The Dornbusch, Fischer, and Samuelson idea was also adopted at that time by Avinash Dixit and Gene Grossman (1982), 49: 583–594, and has remained popular in the more recent literature on outsourcing and fragmentation, e.g., Gene Grossman and Esteban Rossi-Hansberg (2008).

References

  • Corden, W. M. (1971). The Theory of Protection. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixit, A., & Grossman, G. M. (1982). Trade and protection with multi-stage production. Review of Economic Studies, 49(4), 583–594.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dornbusch, R., Fischer, S., & Samuelson, P. A. (1977). Comparative advantage, trade, and payments in a Ricardian model with a continuum of goods. American Economic Review, 67, 823–839.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grossman, G.M., & Esteban, R.-H. (2008). Trading tasks: A simple theory of offshoring. 98(5).

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R. W. (1967). International capital movements and the theory of tariffs and trade. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 81, 1–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R. W. (1975). Income distribution and effective protection in a multi-commodity trade model. Journal of Economic Theory, 11, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, R. W. & Kierzkowski, H. (1990). Chap. 3: The role of services in production and international trade: a theoretical framework. In R. Jones & A. Krueger (Eds.), The political economy of international trade. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kemp, M. C. (1966). The gain from international trade and investment: A Neo-Heckscher-Ohlin approach. American Economic Review, 56, 788–809.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayer, W. (1974). Short-run and long-run equilibrium for a small open economy. Journal of Political Economy, 82, 955–967.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neary, J. P. (1978). Short-run capital specificity and the pure theory of international trade. Economic Journal, 88, 488–510.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanyal, K. K. (1980). Stages of production: The role of international trade. Ph. D. dissertation, University of Rochester.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanyal, K. K. (1983). Vertical specialization in a Ricardian Model with a continuum of stages of production. Economica, 50, 70–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sanyal, K.K. & Jones, R.W. (1982). The theory of trade in middle products. American Economic Review, 72, 16–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, A. A. (1928). Increasing returns and economic progress. Economic Journal, 38, 527–542.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ronald W. Jones .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer India

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jones, R.W. (2014). Middle Products Revisited. In: Acharyya, R., Marjit, S. (eds) Trade, Globalization and Development. Springer, India. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1151-8_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics