Inequality, Public Service Provision, and Exclusion of the Poor



The rhetoric of inclusive growth has no doubt caught the imaginations of development planners and policy makers almost everywhere in the world. Recent policy and research documents from various institutions, ministries, individual researchers are abound with mention of inclusive as the most important ingredient for development. In India, the country which has observed sustained high growth of GDP for almost a decade now, every recent policy document has a reference to the target of making the growth pro-poor and inclusive. This continuing fascination about inclusive growth on the part of the researchers and policy-makers indicates that the economics community now recognizes the fact that the market-driven growth in some developing countries is not enough for development. In fact, there are now several evidences from individual countries which show that growth elasticity of poverty reduction decreases with high growth. Moreover, that higher income inequality reduces the poverty impact of growth is also well-documented. So inequality enhancing high growth not only may lead to adverse poverty impacts, but also has the potential to reduce the poverty impact of future growth.


Public Service Income Inequality Income Growth Indirect Utility Club Member 


  1. Besley T, Ghatak M (2003) Incentives, choice, and accountability in the provision of public services. Oxf Rev Econ Policy 19:235–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Blank RM (2000) When can public policy makers rely on private markets? the effective provision of social services. Econ J 110:C34–C49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Graham C (1998) Private markets for public goods—raising the stakes in economic reform. Brookings Institution Press, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  4. Gulati N, Ray T (2011) Inequality, neighbourhoods and welfare of the poor. Discussion Paper 11–07, Indian Statistical Institute, DelhiGoogle Scholar
  5. Ireland NJ (1990) The mix of social and private provision of goods and services. J Public Econ 43:201–219CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Motiram S, Nugent JB (2007) Economic and political inequality and the quality of public goods. Int J Dev Issues 6:142–167CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Osberg L, Smeeding T, Schwabish J (2004) Income distribution and public social expenditure: theories, effects and evidence. In: Neckerman K (ed) Social inequality. Russell Sage Foundation, NY, pp 821–859Google Scholar
  8. Tawney RH (1964) Equality. London: Unwin Books, first published in 1931, 4th editionGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of EconomicsUniversity of CalcuttaKolkataIndia

Personalised recommendations