Telecommunications Industry in the Era of Globalization with Special Reference to India

  • Debabrata Datta
  • Soumyen Sikdar
  • Susmita Chatterjee


Globalization opens up possibilities for gains in efficiency through international exchange based on the principle of comparative advantage. These gains are very significantly augmented with the development of communications system that reduces cost of negotiations, monitoring, and coordination. The advent of telegraph as a communication device in 1839 in Britain marked a signal change in this scenario of cost of communication.


Switching Cost Private Firm Code Division Multiple Access Public Firm Spectrum Allocation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Board S (2007) Bidding into the red: a model of post-auction bankruptcy. J Finance LXII(6):2695–2723Google Scholar
  2. Buehler S, Dewenter R, Haucap J (2005) Mobile number portability in Europe, discussion paper no. 41. Department of Economics, University of the Federal Armed Forces HamburgGoogle Scholar
  3. Buehler S, Haucap J (2004) Mobile number portability. J Ind Competition Trade 4:223–228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bulow J, Levin J, Milgrom P (2009) Winning play in spectrum auctions. NBER working paper no. 14765Google Scholar
  5. Burguet R (2005) License, allocation and performance in telecommunication market. Working paper, Institute for Economic Analysis, Barcelona, SpainGoogle Scholar
  6. Cave M, Valetti T (2000) Are spectrum auctions ruining our grandchildren’s future? Info: J policy regul strategy Telecommun inf 2(4):347–350Google Scholar
  7. Choi K (2012) Cournot and Bertrand competition with asymmetric costs in a mixed duopoly revisited. MPRA paper no. 37704Google Scholar
  8. Datta D (2012) Spectrum auction and investment in telecom industry—a suggested policy. Vikalpa 37(1):19–30, IIM, AhmadabadGoogle Scholar
  9. Datta D, Chatterjee S (2011) Optimal spectrum allocation market structure and subsidization. Telecommun 60(1) BSNL, Sanchar Vikas BhawanGoogle Scholar
  10. Datta D, Chatterjee S (2012) BSNL-consumer perception and necessary remedial measure, forthcoming in Telecommunications 60(6) BSNL, Sanchar Vikas Bhawan Google Scholar
  11. Datta D, Chowdhury SM (2009) Indian telecom: regulation, spectrum allocation and dispute Management. IIMB Mgmt Rev 21(4):287–296Google Scholar
  12. De Fraja G, Delbono F (1989) Alternative strategies of a public enterprise in oligopoly. Oxf Econ Pap 41:302–311Google Scholar
  13. De Fraja G, Delbono F (1990) Game theoretic models of mixed oligopoly. J Econ Surv 4(1):1–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Demsetz H (1968) Why regulate utilities? J Law Econ 11:55–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Economides N (2004) Telecommunications regulation: an introduction. Working paper 04–20, NET InstituteGoogle Scholar
  16. Elliott R (2002) Wireless information management. Inf Mgmt J 36(5):62–66Google Scholar
  17. Ghosh A, Mitra M (2010) Comparing Bertrand and Cournot outcomes in mixed market. Econ Lett 109:72–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goldberg VP (1976) Regulation and administered contracts. Bell J Econ 7:426–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Greve T, Keiding H (2010): Regulated competition under increasing returns to scale. University of Copenhagen, Deptarment of Economics, discussion paper no. 11–01Google Scholar
  20. Haan MA, Toolsema LA (2003) License auctions when winning bids are financed through debt. Working paper no. 200310, University of Groningen, CCSO Centre for Economic ResearchGoogle Scholar
  21. Harmer JA, Friel CD (2001) 3G products—what will they enable? BT Technol J 19:24–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jonason A, Eliasson G (2001) Mobile internet revenues: an empirical study of the mode I- portal. J Internet Res 4:3–27Google Scholar
  23. Kalakota R, Robinson M (2002) M-business vs. M-commerce.
  24. Klemperer P (1987a) Markets with consumer switching cost. Quart J Econ 102(2):375–394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Klemperer P (1987b) The competitiveness of markets with switching costs. RAND J Econ 18:139–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Klemperer P (1988) Welfare effects of entry into markets with switching costs. J Ind Econ 37:159–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Klemperer P (1995) Competition when consumers have switching costs: an overview with applications to industrial organization, macroeconomics, and international trade. Rev Econ Stud 62:515–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lange O (1936) On the economic theory of socialism. Rev Econ Stud 4(1):53–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Liu Z (2005) Stackelberg leadership with demand uncertainty. Manag Decis Econ 26:345–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lu Y, Poddar S (2005) Mixed oligopoly and the choice of capacity. Res Econ 59:365–374CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Malik P (2004) Indian telecommunications policy and regulation: impact on investment and market structure. Discussion paper WDR 0304Google Scholar
  32. Maskin E (2000) Auctions, development and privatizations: efficient auctions with liquidity constrained buyers (Alfred Marshall lecture). Eur Econ Rev 44:667–681CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Matsumura T, Ogawa A (2012) Price vs. quantity in a mixed duopoly. Econ Lett 116(2):174–177Google Scholar
  34. McMillan J (1994) Selling spectrum rights. J Econ Perspect 8(3):145–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Merrill W, Schneider N (1966) Government firms in oligopoly industries: a short run analysis. Quart J Econ 80:400–412CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Milgrom PR, Weber RJ (1982) A theory of auctions and competitive bidding. Econometrica 50:1089–1122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. NERA/Smith (1998) Feasibility study and cost benefit analysis of number portability for mobile services in Hong Kong, Final Report OFTA. NERA/Smith, LondonGoogle Scholar
  38. Nishimori A, Ogawa H (2004) Do firms always choose excess capacity? Econ Bull 12:1–7Google Scholar
  39. Oestmann S (2003) Mobile operators: their contribution to universal service and public access, Intelecon Research & Consultancy Ltd. available at
  40. Oftel (1997) Economic evaluation of number portability in the UK mobile telephony market, a report by Office of Telecommunications, LondonGoogle Scholar
  41. Porter ME (1985) Competitive strategy: techniques for analyzing industries and competitor. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  42. Selten R (1973) A simple model of imperfect competition where four are few and six are many. Int J Game Theory 2(3):141–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Sengupta A, Tauman Y (2011) Inducing efficiency in oligopolistic markets with increasing returns to scale, mathematical social sciences. Elsevier 62(2):95–100Google Scholar
  44. Shy O (2001) The economics of network industries. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sidak JG, Spulber DF (1999) Deregulatory takings and the regulatory contract: the competitive transformation of network industries in the United States. J Comp Econ 27(1):198–201Google Scholar
  46. Singh N, Vives X (1984) Price and quantity competition in a differentiated duopoly. Rand J Econ 15:546–554CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. The Economist (23 Jan 2012) The rise of state capitalismGoogle Scholar
  48. Viard VB (2004) Do switching costs make markets more or less competitive? The case of 800-number portability. Stanford Graduate School of Business research paper series, Paper no. 1773(R1)
  49. Virmani A (2000) A communication policy for the 21st Century. Econ Polit Wkly XXXV(23):1907–1910Google Scholar
  50. Virmani A (2004) Competitive access to telecom: Spectrum policy and M & A. Econ Polit Wkly XXXIX(7):14–20Google Scholar
  51. Vives X (1999) Oligopoly pricing: old idea and new tools. MIT Press, Cambridge and LondonGoogle Scholar
  52. Voice and Data. Cyber Media Publications, Various IssuesGoogle Scholar
  53. Wilson RB (1992) Strategic analysis of auctions. In: Aumann RJ, Hart S (eds) Handbook of Game Theory with economic applications, vol 1. North Holland, AmsterdamGoogle Scholar
  54. Zheng CB (2001) High bid, broke winners. J Econ Theory 100:129–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Debabrata Datta
    • 1
  • Soumyen Sikdar
    • 2
  • Susmita Chatterjee
    • 3
  1. 1.Institute of Management and TechnologyGaziabadIndia
  2. 2.Indian Institute of Management CalcuttaKolkataIndia
  3. 3.Globsyn Business SchoolKolkataIndia

Personalised recommendations