Skip to main content

Gender and Partial Separability: The Indian Experience

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 444 Accesses

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Economics ((BRIEFSECONOMICS))

Abstract

Before we venture into the empirical exercise, it may be pertinent to consider some statistical aspects of the variables used in our models. First we look at some simple statistical properties. Here all variables are expressed in average state-level figures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   34.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   49.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    It can be genuinely argued that the difference between these two proportions is statistically insignificant. However even then the puzzle remains. Women in traditional society are believed to have comparative advantage in home based activities than their male counterpart.

  2. 2.

    Infact we are trying to estimate the Eq. (4.6) derived earlier. Two types of regressions—linear and log-linear are used in our analysis.

  3. 3.

    We preferred the Cobb-Douglas form instead of other flexible functional forms since the coefficients and shadow price derived from it lends itself to easy interpretation. This interpretation of shadow price is useful because we use it for estimation of female participation function.

  4. 4.

    However Abdulai and Regmi (2000) have found no significant differences in male–female Productivity by incorporating time allocated for household purposes in their estimation of labour supply functions. This may however reflect an inherent heterogeneity between time allocated for household chores and that allocated for productivity effort. For females, the former may include a greater intensity of effort per unit of time allocated.

References

  • Becker G (1985) Human capital, effort and sexual division of labor. J Labor Econ 3(1):33–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abdulai A, Regmi PP (2000) Estimating labor supply of farm households under non-separability: empirical evidence from Nepal. Agric Econ 22(3):309–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Atanu Sengupta .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Sengupta, A., Datta, S.K., Mondal, S. (2013). Gender and Partial Separability: The Indian Experience. In: Productivity, Separability and Deprivation. SpringerBriefs in Economics. Springer, India. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1056-6_6

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics