The Link with a Home Country

A Comparative Analysis of Host Country Environments for Diaspora Engagement
  • Gabriela Tejada
  • Metka Hercog
  • Christiane Kuptsch
  • Jean-Claude Bolay


The benefits that highly skilled migrants can bring to their home countries are increasingly regarded as being important for development, and consequently, many countries are now looking to take advantage of the experiences of their diasporas. The policies of home countries are usually given a position of prominence whenever diaspora engagement is on the agenda. Nevertheless, migrants who have successfully settled in their host country are in the best position to contribute to their country of origin. Therefore, the institutional environment and policies of the host countries play an equally significant role with regard to the opportunities that diasporas have in terms of gaining relevant expertise and being able to mobilise. This paper looks at host country environments in several European countries, and its aim is to identify good practices of enabling policies to get skilled diasporas involved in the socio-economic development of their home countries. The paper is based on a comprehensive policy review of France, Germany, the Netherlands and Switzerland with respect to their migration and development nexus and on in-depth interviews with key experts in this field. In addition, it provides first-hand information on the subject from skilled Indians in Europe. India is often cited as a positive example of a country that has benefited from skilled migration through reverse investment flows and the world’s highest transfers of remittances and expertise. While several Indian diaspora knowledge networks are present in the USA, we know relatively little about the activities of Indian professionals in Europe. Until recently the countries of continental Europe barely existed on the map of mobile Indian professionals. Therefore, this paper seeks to fill two gaps in the existing literature: first of all, it examines the conditions of Indian professionals in new destination countries, and secondly, it explores the impact of structural differences between host countries and their ability to provide a fruitful environment for diaspora engagement in home-country development.


Host Country Home Country Destination Country Foreign Student Migration Policy 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



We would like to thank B. Girard, V. Castillo, S. Naus and A. Henslin for their contributions to this chapter.


  1. Acosta, P., Fajnzylber, P., & Humberto, L. J. (2007). The impact of remittances on poverty and human capital: Evidence from Latin American household surveys. In M. Schiff (Ed.), International migration, economic development and policy. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  2. Adams, R. (2011). Evaluating the economic impact of international remittances on developing countries using household surveys: A literature review. Journal of Development Studies, 47(6), 809–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Agunias, D. R. (2006). Remittances and development: Trends, impacts and policy options – a review of the literature. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute.Google Scholar
  4. Agunias, D. R., & Newland, K. (2007). Circular migration and development: Trends, policy, routes and ways forward. In Policy brief. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute.Google Scholar
  5. Barré, R., Hernández, V., Meyer, J.-B., & Vinck, D. (2003). Diasporas scientifiques. ¿Comment les pays en développement peuvent-ils tirer parti de leurs chercheurs et de leurs ingénieurs expatriés? Paris: Institute de Recherche pour le Développement.Google Scholar
  6. Bauböck, R., & Faist, T. (2010). Diaspora and transnationalism. Concepts, theories and methods. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). New York: Greenwood Press.Google Scholar
  8. Bruggeman, J. (2008). Social networks, an introduction. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  9. Calhoun, C. (1997). Nationalism. Minnesota: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  10. Cassarino, J. P. (2004). Theorising return migration: A revisited conceptual approach to return migrants (EUI working papers RSCAS, 2004/02).Google Scholar
  11. Castles, S., & Miller, M. J. (2003). The age of migration. London: MacMillan Press.Google Scholar
  12. Cerna, L. (2009). The varieties of high-skilled immigration policies: coalitions and policy outputs in advanced industrial countries. Journal of European Public Policy, 16(1), 144–161.Google Scholar
  13. Chaloff, J., & Lemaitre, G. (2009). Managing highly-skilled labour migration: A comparative analysis of migration policies and challenges in OECD countries. OECD social, employment and migration working papers, no. 79.Google Scholar
  14. Commission of the European Communities. (2002). Proposal for a council directive on the conditions of entry and residence of third-country nationals for the purposes of studies, vocational training or voluntary service, COM (2002) 548 final – 2002/0242 (CNS), Brussels, 7 Oct 2002.Google Scholar
  15. de Haas, H. (2005). International migration, remittances and development: Myths and facts. Third World Quarterly, 26(8), 1269–1284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. de Haas, H. (2006). Engaging diasporas. How governments and development agencies can support diaspora involvement in the development of origin countries. Oxford: International Migration Institute; University of Oxford.Google Scholar
  17. de Haas, H. (2008). Migration and development. A theoretical perspective. International Migration Institute, Oxford: University of Oxford.Google Scholar
  18. de Haas, H. (2011). The migration and development pendulum: A critical view on research and policy. The migration-development nexus revisited: State of the art and ways ahead. University of TrentoGoogle Scholar
  19. de Haas, H., & Fokkema, T. (2011). The effects of integration and transnational ties on international return migration intentions. Demographic Research, 25(24), 755–782.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. de Hart, B., & van Oers, R. (2006). European trend in nationality law. In R. Bauböck, E. Ersboll, K. Groenendijk, & H. Waldrauch (Eds.), Acquisition and loss of nationality. Policies and trends in 15 European countries. Volume 1:Comparative analyses (pp. 317–350). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  21. European Commission. (2006). European Union Labour Force Survey. Eurosat Indicators. coalitions and policy outputs in advanced industrial countries. Journal of European Public Policy, 16(1), 144–161.Google Scholar
  22. Faist, T. (2000). The volume and dynamics of international migration and transnational social spaces. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Faist, T., Fauser, M., & Kivisto, P. (2011). The migration-development nexus. A transnational perspective (Migration, diasporas and citizenship). Basingstoke: Palgrave McMillian.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. GFMD, Global Forum on Migration and Development. (2007). Background paper for Roundtable 1 Human capital development and labor mobility: Maximizing opportunities and minimizing risks.
  25. Ghosh, B. (2006). Migrants’ remittances and development: Myths, rhetoric and realities. Geneva: IOM/The Hague Process on Refugees and Migration.Google Scholar
  26. Goldring, L. (2003). Re-thinking remittances: Social and political dimensions of individual and collective remittances (CERLAC working paper series). York University. Accessed 9 Aug 2011.
  27. Hailbronner, K. (2006). Nationality in public international law and European law. In R. Bauböck, E. Ersboll, K. Groenendijk, & H. Waldrauch (Eds.), Acquisition and loss of nationality. Policies and trends in 15 European countries. Volume 1:Comparative analyses (pp. 35–85). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Hercog, M., & Wiesbrock, A. (2010). The legal framework for highly-skilled migration to the EU: EU and US labour migration policies compared (MGSOG working paper no.01).Google Scholar
  29. Heß, B., & Sauer, L. (2007). Conditions of entry and residence of third country highly qualified and highly skilled workers: The situation in Germany. Study in the framework of the European Migration Network (EMN) by the German National Contact Point, Budesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge and EMN. Accessed 4 May 2011.
  30. Howard, M. M. (2005). Variation in dual citizenship policies in the countries of the EU. The International Migration Review, 39(3), 697–720.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Itzigsohn, J., & Giorguli Saucedo, S. (2002). Immigrant incorporation and sociocultural transnationalism. International Migration Review, 36(3), 766–798.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kapur, D. (2001). Diasporas and technology transfer. Journal of Human Development, 2(2), 265–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Kapur, D. (2010). Diaspora development and democracy; The domestic impact of international migration from India. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Kapur, D., & McHale, J. (2005). Give us your best and brightest: The global hunt for talents and its impacts on the developing world. Washington, DC: Center for Global Development.Google Scholar
  35. Katseli, L., Lucas, R., & Xenogiani, T. (2006). Effects on migration on sending countries. What do we know? OECD working papers.Google Scholar
  36. Ketkar, S., & Ratha, D. (2009). Innovative financing for development. Washington, DC: The World Bank.Google Scholar
  37. Khadria, B. (2008). International migration policy: Issues and perspectives for India (IMDS project working paper series, WP no. 1, pp. 2–20). New Delhi: IMDS Project.Google Scholar
  38. Kumar, P., Sarkar, S., & Sharma, R. (2009). Migration and diaspora formation: Mobility of Indian students to the developed world (IMDS project working papers series, WP no. 8, pp. 29–45). New Delhi: IMDS Project.Google Scholar
  39. Kuptsch, C. (2006). Students and talent flow – the case of Europe: From castle to harbour? In C. Kuptsch & E. F. Pang (Eds.), Competing for global talent (pp. 33–61). Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar
  40. Kuznetsov, Y. (2006). Diaspora networks and the international migration of skills: How countries can draw on their talent abroad. Washington, DC: World Bank Institute Development Studies.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Levitt, P. (1998). Social remittances: Migration-driven local-level forms of cultural diffusion. International Migration Review, 32(4), 926–948.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Levitt, P., & Lamba-Nieves, D. (2011). Social remittances revisited. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 37(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lowell, B. L., & Gerova, S. G. (2004). Diasporas and economic development: State of knowledge. Institute for the Study of International Migration, Georgetown University.Google Scholar
  44. Lucas, R. (2001). Diaspora and development: Highly skilled migrants from East Asia. Report prepared for the World Bank. Accessed 9 Aug 2011.
  45. Mahroum, S. (2003). Brain gain, brain drain. An international overview. Background paper for the Austrian Ministry for Transport, Innovation and Technology (bmvit). Alpbach Technology Dialogue.Google Scholar
  46. Meyer, J.-B. (2011). A sociology of diaspora knowledge networks. In T. Faist, M. Fauser, & P. Kivisto (Eds.), The migration-development nexus. A transnational perspective (pp. 159–181). Basingstoke: Palgrave McMillian.Google Scholar
  47. Newland, K., Agunias, D. R., & Terrazas, A. (2008). Learning by doing: Experiences of circular migration. Washington, DC: Migration Policy Institute.Google Scholar
  48. OECD. (2008). A profile of immigrant populations in the 21st century: Data from OECD countries. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  49. OECD. (2010a). Table C2.7. Number of foreign students in tertiary education, by country of origin and destination (2008), and market shares in international education (2000, 2008) Education at a Glance 2010: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  50. OECD. (2010b). International migration outlook: Annual report 2010. Paris: OECD.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. OECD. (2011). Education at a glance, OECD Indicators.
  52. Portes, A. (2001). Introduction: The debates and significance of immigrant transnationalism. Global Networks, 1(3), 181–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Portes, A. (2003). Conclusion: Theoretical convergencies and empirical evidence in the study of immigrant transnationalism. International Migration Review, 37(3), 874–892.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Saxenian, A. (2005). From brain drain to brain circulation: Transnational communities and regional upgrading in India and China. Studies in Comparative International Development, 40(2), 35–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Saxenian, A. (2006). The new argonauts. Regional advantage in a global economy. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Schneider, J. (2009). The organisation of asylum and migration policies in Germany. Nürnberg: Bundesamt für Migration und Flüchtlinge.Google Scholar
  57. Singh, M. (2010, January 8). Speech by the Prime Minister at Pravasi Bharatiya Divas 2010. New Delhi, India.
  58. Snel, E., Engbersen, G., & Leerkes, A. (2006). Transnational involvement and social integration. Global Networks, 6(3), 285–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Spiro, P. J. (1997). Dual nationality and the meaning of citizenship. Emory Law Journal, 46(4), 1411–1485.Google Scholar
  60. Tejada, G. (2012). Mobility, knowledge and cooperation: scientific diasporas as agents of development. Migration and Development, 10(18), 59–92.Google Scholar
  61. Tejada, G., & Bolay, J.-C. (2010). Scientific diasporas from developing countries in Switzerland: Empirical evidence and policy responses. Skilled migrants from Colombia, India and South Africa in Switzerland as partners in development. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  62. Tejada, G., & Wickramasekara, P. (2010). An action-oriented tool-kit to assess good practices of skilled migrants and scientific diasporas. Lausanne: Cooperation@epfl and International Labour Office.Google Scholar
  63. Vertovec, S. (2004). Migrant transnationalism and modes of transformation. The International Migration Review, 38(3), 970–1001.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Waldrauch, H. (2006). Rights of expatriates, multiple citizens and restricted citizenship for certain nationals. In R. Bauböck, E. Ersboll, K. Groenendijk, & H. Waldrauch (Eds.), Acquisition and loss of nationality. Policies and trends in 15 European countries. Volume 1: Comparative analyses (pp. 359–379). Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Wescott, C., & Brinkerhoff, J. (2006). Converting migration drains into gains harnessing the resources of overseas professionals. Manila: Asian Development Bank.Google Scholar
  66. Wickramasekara, P. (2010). Transnational communities: Reflections on definitions, measurements and contributions. In G. Tejada & J.-C. Bolay (Eds.), Scientific diasporas as development partners. Skilled migrants from Colombia, India and South Africa in Switzerland: Empirical evidence and policy responses (pp. 137–178). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  67. Wickramasekara, P. (2011). Circular migration: A triple win or a dead end. Geneva: ILO.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gabriela Tejada
    • 1
  • Metka Hercog
    • 1
  • Christiane Kuptsch
    • 2
  • Jean-Claude Bolay
    • 1
  1. 1.Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL)LausanneSwitzerland
  2. 2.International Labour Office (ILO)GenevaSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations