Diaspora in Mauritius: A Recipe for Contested Development



Strategically situated in the Indian Ocean—yet with neither defence forces nor any natural resources to trade—Mauritius relies on FDI, market access and military assistance for its survival. Due to its colonial links, Mauritius has benefited from a series of preferences from the UK (e.g. Commonwealth Sugar Agreement) and from its Francophone membership (e.g. France Telecom investment). Its colonial past, coupled with a consequent ethnically unbalanced demography composed of 68 % of Indian descent, 27 % of African descent, 3 % of Chinese descent and 2 % of Franco-Mauritian, Mauritius is liable to be cautious in its affiliation during exercises of international diplomacy. This is particularly relevant in the interplay between China and India on the Mauritian investment scenario. Aware of the Mahanian conflict between the two regional competitors regarding influence over the Indian Ocean, Mauritius aptly uses its active diaspora links with one as a negotiation leverage to incite investment cooperation from the other. It is in under a similar practice that Mauritius has secured the two biggest investment projects in its history: The Mauritius JinFei Economic and Trade Cooperation Zone by China (2006) and the NeoTown zone project by Indian developers (2010). What is remarkable is that Mauritius adopts a management method allowing it to secure its diaspora loyalty to both home countries; while India is granted investment monopoly in ICT and services, Chinese activism is welcomed in construction and manufacturing. The Mauritian negotiation strategy almost resembles Putnam’s two-level game (Putnam International Organization 42: 427–460, 1988) though in an inverted fashion, whereby the international is harmonized at the domestic level. However, the use of diaspora links as a bait to lure investment from China and India needs to be evaluated as it might become an excuse for Mauritius to overlook more viable investment partnership alternatives.


Political Party Ethnic Community Chinese Immigrant Southern African Development Community Indian Immigrant 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. African Development Bank. (2009, May). Mauritius 2009-201. Country strategy papers (p. 26). http://www.afdb.org/fileadmin/uploads/afdb/Documents/Policy-Documents/MAURITIUS_2009_2013%20COUNTRY%20STRATEGY%20PAPER.pdf. Accessed 25 July 2011.
  2. Bissoondoyal, S. (1991). Concise history of Mauritius (Rev. ed.). Bombay: Bharatiya Vidya Bhavan.Google Scholar
  3. Brautigam, D. (2005, Summer/Fall). Strategic engagement: Markets, transnational networks, and globalization in Mauritius. Yale Journal of International Affairs, 1, 63–78.Google Scholar
  4. Brautigam, D. (2007, March). “Flying Geese” or “Hidden Dragon”? Chinese Business and African Industrial Development (Draft chapter). Prepared for The Politics of Contemporary China-Africa Relations. Google Scholar
  5. Bunwaree, S. (2002). Economics, conflicts and interculturality in a small island state: The case of Mauritius. Polis: Revue Camerounaise de Science Politique, 9(Numéro Spécial), 1–19.Google Scholar
  6. Bunwaree, S. (2005, December). State-society relations: Re-engineering the Mauritian social contract (Draft Paper). CODESRIA General Assembly Conference.Google Scholar
  7. Bunwaree, S., & Kasenally, R. (2005). Political parties and democracy in Mauritius. Johannesburg: EISA.Google Scholar
  8. Cho, A. (2002). The rainbow and the pot of gold: Ethnic diversity and economic development in Mauritius. Centre for International Development at Harvard University. http://www.cid.harvard.edu/cidstudents/cid_thesis_prize.html. Accessed 22 Nov 2013.
  9. Collier, P. (1998, April). The political economy of ethnicity. Paper prepared for the Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics.Google Scholar
  10. Conseil Indien pour les relations culturelles. (1999). Rencontre avec l’Inde: La diaspora Indienne a Maurice. Tome 28. No.1.Google Scholar
  11. Eurostats. (2012, March 21). Mauritius: EU bilateral trade with the world. http://trade.ec.europa.eu/doclib/docs/2006/september/tradoc_122463.pdf. Accessed 25 July 2011.
  12. Gill, G. (2010, August). Understanding the linkages between poverty and ethnicity in Mauritius. A presentation of research findings at the Ministry of Social Integration and Economic Empowerment.Google Scholar
  13. Gillespie, K., et al. (1999). Diaspora interest in homeland investment. Journal of International Business Studies, 30(3), 623–634. 3rd Quarter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Harmon, J. (2009, April 30). What is in stock for the future? Navin, Pravin, Pradeep and Kreol positioning. http://www.montraykreyol.org/spip.php?article2416. Accessed 14 Aug 2011.
  15. Harrison, R. (1988). Economic interdependence, bargaining power, and political influence. International Organization, 42(3), 461–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hugette, L. P. (1985). Chinese diaspora in Western Indian Ocean. Port Louis: Editions de L’Ocean Indien: Mission Catholique Chinoise.Google Scholar
  17. International Finance Corporation-World Bank. (2010). Doing business 2010. http://www.doingbusiness.org/~/media/GIAWB/Doing%20Business/Documents/Annual-Reports/English/DB10-FullReport.pdf. Accessed 26 July 2011.
  18. Lehembre, B. (1984). L’Ile Maurice. Paris: Editions Karthala.Google Scholar
  19. Moller, M. (2009, April). Inbound investment into India through Mauritius incorporated entities. The Jurisdictions, (152), 25.Google Scholar
  20. Putnam, R. (1988). Diplomacy and domestic politics: The logic of two level games. International Organization, 42(3), 427–460.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Reddi, S. (1999). Le rôle des Indiens dans l’économie de Maurice, Conseil Indien pour les relations culturelles, Rencontre avec l’Inde : La diaspora Indienne a Maurice. Tome 28. No.1.Google Scholar
  22. Shenkar, O., & Ronen, S. (1987). The cultural context of negotiations: The implications of Chinese interpersonal norms. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 23, 263–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Srebrnik, H. (1999). Ethnicity and the development of a ‘Middleman’ economy on Mauritius: The diaspora factor. The Round Table, 350, 297–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Subramanian, A., & Roy, D. (2001). Who can explain the Mauritian miracle: Meade, Romer, Sachs or Rodrik? IMF working paper, WP/01/116.Google Scholar
  25. Tuyau, J. (2010, 5 March). Somduth Dulthumun: «C’est nous qui choisissons les vainqueurs des élections». http://www.lexpress.mu/article/somduth-dulthumun-«c’est-nous-qui-choisissons-les-vainqueurs-des-élections». Accessed 14 Aug 2011.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of St AndrewsSt AndrewsScotland

Personalised recommendations