Abstract
Gender-roles have been undergoing considerable change in India since the last century, although their pace is not the same across different sections of the society. The participation of women in work has gone up, but new jobs are largely confined to low-level occupations. Gendered socialization practices and gender-role stereotypes prevalent in the society limit their role perceptions and identity. Such stereotypes are reinforced by the media as well as by literature. The gender-role of women associates them with competence-abilities and skills related to home and family, but not with competencies required in education or in high-end occupations. The challenges they face in the male-dominated world often makes them develop what has been called “learned helplessness”. However, women who escape gendered socialization develop cross-gendered characteristics. It is argued that masculinity and femininity should not be seen as two ends of gender-roles but as two independent characteristics that obtain within the same person. The consequences of cross-gendered personality and role appropriateness are explored in relation to women’s nurturing role in families. Issues related to gender development, government policies on reservation, the integration of women at all levels of work and efforts to empower them are also critically examined.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Baker, D. R. (1987). The Influence of the Role Specific Self-Concept and Sex-Role Identity on Career Choices in Science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 24(8), 739–756.
Baucom, D. H., & Danker-Brown, P. (1979). Influence of sex role as the development of learned helplessness. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 47, 928–936.
Baucom, D. H. (1983). Sex role identify and the decision to region control among women: A learned helplessness investigation. Journal of Personality Assessment, 44, 262–271.
Baucom, D. H., & Danker-Brown, P. (1984). Cognitive influences on the development of learned helplessness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43, 793–801.
Bem, S. L., & Lenney, E. (1975). Sex-typing and avoidance of cross sex behaviour. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 33, 48–54.
Bieri, J. (1968). Sex differences in cognitive behaviour: Bayley’s paper. In K. W. Schaie (Ed.), Theory and methods of research on aging. Magan Town: West Virginia University Press.
Boldizar, J. P. (1991). Assessing sex typing and androgyny in children: The children’s sex role inventory. Developmental Psychology, 27, 505–515.
Cauce, A. M., & Domenech-Rodriguez, M. (2002). Latino families: Myths and realities. In J. M. Contreras, K. A. Kerns & A. M. Neal-Bar nett (Eds.), Latino children and families in the United States (p. 5–25). Westport, CT: Praeger.
Bussey, K., & Bandura, A. (1984). Influence of Gender Constancy and Social Power on Sex Linked Modeling. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47(6), 1292–1302.
Costello, C. B., & Stone, A. J. (Eds.). (2001). The American women 2001–02: Getting to the Top. New York: Norton.
Crain, R. M. (1966). The influence of age, race and gender on child and adolescent multi dimensional self-concept. In B. A. Bracken (Ed.), Handbook of self-concept: Developmental, social and clinical consideration (pp. 240–280). New York: Oxford University Press.
Crawford, M. (1989). Agreeing to differ : Feminist Epistemologies and Women’s Ways of Knowing. In M. Crawford & M. Gentry. (1989). Gender and thought: Psychological perspective. (pp.128–145). New York: Springer -Verlag.
Crawford, M., & Gentry, M. (1989). Gender and thought: Psychological perspective. New York: Springer -Verlag.
Debacker, T. K., & Nelson, R. M. (2000). Motivation to learn science: Differences related to gender, class type, and ability. Journal of Educational Research, 93, 245–254.
Dutta, S. K., & Ghosh, D. K. (2002). Empowering Rural Women. New Delhi: Akansha Publishing House.
Eccles, J. S. (1994). Understanding women’s educational and occupational choice. Applying the Eccles et al. model of achievement related choices. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 18, 585–610.
Elliot, A. J., & Dweck, C. S. (2005). Handbook of competence and motivation. New York: The Guilford Press.
Fredricks, J. A., & Eccles, J. S. (2002). Children’s competence and value beliefs from childhood through adolescence. Growth trajectories in two male-sex typed domains. Developmental Psychology, 38, 519–533.
Hiroto, D. S., & Seligman, M. E. P. (1975). Generality of learned helplessness in man. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 31, 311–327.
Hoffman, L. W. (1972). Early childhood experiences and women’s achievement motives. Journal of Social Issues, 28(2), 129–155.
Horner, M. (1970). Femininity and successful achievement: A basic inconsistency. In J. Bardwick, E. Douvan, M. Horner, & D. Guttman (Eds.), Feminine personality and conflict. Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
Horner, M. (1968). Sex differences in achievement motivation and performance in competitive and noncompetitive situations. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan.
Johnson, P. B., & Goodchilds, J. D. (1976, October). How women get their way. Psychology Today, 10, 69–70.
Kanhere, U. S. (1987). Women and socialization. Delhi: Mittal Publications.
Lenney, E. (1977). Studies of independence and conformity: A minority of one against unanimous majority. Psychological Monographs, 70(9). Whole No. 416.
Lind, P., & Connole, H. (1985). Sex differences in behavioural and cognitive aspects of decision/control. Sex Roles, 12(8), 813–828.
Lips, H. M., & Colwill, N. I. (1978). The psychology of sex differences. New Jersey: Prentice Hall.
Maccoby, E. E., & Jacklin, C. N. (1974). The psychology of sex differences. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Marks, G. N. (2011). Accounting for the gender gaps in student performance in reading and mathematics: evidence from 31 countries. Oxford Review of Education, 34(1), 89–109.
Mehta, P. H. Pant, D., & Gaur, J. S. (1984). Scholastic ability and socio economic status in educational and vocational planning of class XI boys. Paper presented at All India Educational and Vocational Guidance Conference, Bombay—1984 (Memeo).
Mehta, P. H., Mathur, R. K., & Pant, D. (1987). Influences on level of occupational aspiration of adolescents. Indian Educational Review, 10, 42–62.
Ohbuchi, K. & Yamamoto, I. (1990). The power strategies of Japanese children in interpersonal conflict : Effect of age, gender and target. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 151(3), 349–360.
Overton, W. F., & Mecham, A. M. (1982). Individual differences in formal operational though: Sex—role and learned helplessness. Child Development.
Pandey, A. K. (2002). Emerging issues in empowerment of women. New Delhi : Anmol Publishers.
Pandeya, R. (2007). Women in India: Issues, peers policies and solutions. New Delhi: New Century Publications.
Pant, D, & Sen, A. (1993). Attributional differences in susceptibility among sex role groups to learned helplessness. Indian Educational Review, 28, 88–99. 1 Jan 1993.
Radloff, L. S., & Manroe, M. K. (1978). Sex-differences in helplessness with implications for depression. In L. S. Hansen & R. L. Rapoza (Eds.) Career development and counselling of women. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
Radloff, L. S. (1975). Sex-differences in depression: The effect s of occupation and marital status. Sex- Roles, 1, 249–265. Review of Education, 34(1), 89–109.
Rathod, P. B. (2009). Women and development. Jaipur: A&D Publishers.
Sandberg, D. E., Ehrhardt, A. A., Ince, S. E. & Meyer – Bahlburg, H.F. (1991). Gender differences in children and adolescents career aspirations : A follow-up study. Journal of Adolescent Research, 6(3), 371–386.
Sandberg, D. E., Ehrhardt, A. A., Hellins, C. A., & Inc.,S. A. (1987). The Influence of Individual and Family Characteristics upon Career Aspirations of Girls during Childhood and Adolescents. Sex Role, 16(11–12), 649–668.
Saravia, D. G. (2011). Ensuring inclusion. Bharat Soka Gakkai International Quarterly, 63, 19.
Seligman, M. E. P. (1975). Helplessness: On depression, development and death. San Francisco: Freeman.
Stuart (1973). Vulnerability to learned helplessness and sex-role stereotyping in women. Dissertation Abstracts International, 38, 10-B, 5047.
Thayer, S. M., Updegraff, K. A., & Delgado, M. Y. (2008). Conflict resolution in Mexican American adolescents. Journal of Youth Adolescents, 37(7), 783–797.
Unger, R. K. (1989). Sex, Gender and epistemology. In M. Crawford & M. Gentry (Eds.), Gender and thought: Psychological Perspective. New York: Springer.
Walker, L. E. (1977–78). Battered Women and learned helplessness. Victimology, 2, 525–534.
Walstead, J. J. (1977). The altruistic other orientation. An exploration of female powerlessness. Psychology Women Quarterly, 2(2), 162–176.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer India
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Pant, D. (2014). Gender-Role Socialization, Stereotypes, Government Policies and Development. In: Tripathi, R., Sinha, Y. (eds) Psychology, Development and Social Policy in India. Springer, New Delhi. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1003-0_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-1003-0_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, New Delhi
Print ISBN: 978-81-322-1002-3
Online ISBN: 978-81-322-1003-0
eBook Packages: Behavioral ScienceBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)