Risk Management

  • P. K. Jain
  • Shveta Singh
  • Surendra Singh Yadav
Part of the India Studies in Business and Economics book series (ISBE)


The processes of liberalisation and globalisation have seeped into the economic fabric of all nations across the world. Even the countries which were largely closed to the external influence on their economic system have opened up in terms of trade and investment. It is a shared perception of economists and researchers that free market system and liberalisation of business bring about higher growth and widespread development. In such a system, typically, business firms are able to raise resources at a global level as well as market their products across countries.

Before the year 1991, India remained a relatively closed economy, permitting only limited economic transactions with other countries. The macroeconomic policy of 1991 played a major role in India’s economic progress in the 1990s and beyond. But the questions arise: do the processes of liberalisation and globalisation/internationalisation create new risks? If they do, what are these risks? And what is done or can be done to mitigate these risks? The answer to the first question is affirmative, meaning thereby, that international operations have all those risks that are inherent in purely domestic operations and, in addition, they give rise to new risks such as country or political risk, exchange rate risk and interest rate risk. Risk management is the process of identification, assessment and prioritisation of risks followed by coordinated and economical application of resources to minimise probability and/or impact of adverse events or to maximise the realisation of opportunities.

These risks may be encountered more by companies in private sector as they are likely to have greater external orientation. The available literature does not indicate a comprehensive inquiry into globalisation and its resultant risk dynamics on a large corporate data set. Hence, it was necessary to ascertain from the finance managers their current practices of risk management and also perceptions about the future practices in this regard. Consequently, this chapter analyses and discusses the survey findings relating to the management of risks resulting from international operations.

The sample companies are amongst the largest companies in India with substantial international exposure in terms of size of transactions. Yet their holding pattern still remains dominantly domestic. This factor could have been responsible in part for the relative insulation of the Indian economy in the aftermath of the financial crisis originating in the USA in the year 2007–2008. Though the Indian economy has faced a slowdown, the profitability of sample companies has remained at a reasonable level. An overwhelming majority (96.42 %) of companies respond that risk is understood in its entirety by the company and measures are taken to mitigate it. This is an indication of the sophisticated risk assessment and management practices being followed by the sample companies.

The sample companies would like to reduce political or country risk by incorporating a risk premium in the cost of capital. Amongst other measures, creating a joint venture with an enterprise of the host country is the most preferred one. As regards exchange risk management, in case of anticipated depreciation, companies sell local currency forward, borrow locally and invoice exports in foreign currency and imports in local currency. In the case of anticipated appreciation, the most likely ways are to buy local currency forward and to reduce local currency borrowing. From the survey, it is apparent that the sample companies are only using netting and back-to-back swap (internal techniques of exchange risk management) in any significant manner. As regards the use of external techniques, forwards are the most preferred, followed by currency swaps, currency options and currency futures. Exchange risk management is organised by internal teams as well as with the help of outside institutional consultants. The survey revealed that sample companies are faced with interest rate risk and they would like to use newer instruments including derivatives such as interest rate options, swaps and futures as they become more and more prevalent in the market.


Risk Management Foreign Direct Investment Foreign Exchange Risk Premium Foreign Currency 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Acharya S (2001) India’s macroeconomic management in the nineties. Indian Council for Research on International Economic Relations, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  2. Akdogu E, MacKay P (2008) Investment and competition. J Finance Quant Anal 43(2):299–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alexander C (1999) Risk management and analysis, vol 2: New markets and procedures. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  4. Baeka HY, Kwok Chuck CY (2002) Foreign exchange rates and the corporate choice of foreign entry mode. Int Rev Econ Finance 11:207–227CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. BCBS (2003) Sound practices for the management and supervision of operational risk, bank for international settlements, Basel. J Risk Finance 12(2):136Google Scholar
  6. Bhalla GS (2000) Political economy of Indian development in the 20th century: India’s road to freedom and growth. Presidential address at the 83rd annual conference of the Indian Economic Association, University of Jammu, Jammu and KashmirGoogle Scholar
  7. Chandra P (2011) Financial management – theory and practice, 8th edn. Tata McGraw Hill, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  8. Chuppe TM, Haworth HR, Watkins MG (1989) Global finance: causes, consequences and prospects for the future. Global Finance J 1(1):1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Doherty NA (2000) Integrated risk management – technologies and strategies for managing corporate risk. McGraw-Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  10. Duru Bias A, Reeb DM (2002) International diversification and analysts’ forecast accuracy and bias. Acc Rev 77(2):415–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Economic Survey of India 2007: Policy brief. Available at Accessed 20 Apr 2012
  12. Economic Survey of India 2011. Available at,3746,en_2649_33733_48079140_1_1_1_1,00.html. Accessed 13 June 2012
  13. Foster MJ (2000) Evaluating foreign direct investments: new challenges for strategic planners. J Oper Res Soc 51(1):45–52Google Scholar
  14. Fox RJ, Crask MR, Kim J (1988) Mail survey response rate – a meta-analysis of selected techniques for inducing response. Public Opin Q 52(4):467–491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Fratzscher M (2009) What explains global exchange rate movements during the financial crisis? J Int Money Finance 28(8):1390–1407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gupta SP (1999) Development experience of the nineties and search for a new paradigm. A.K. Dasgupta Memorial Lecture at the 82nd annual conference of the Indian Economic Association, Guru Nanak Dev University, AmritsarGoogle Scholar
  17. Gupta PK (2011) Risk management in Indian companies: EWRM concerns and issues. J Risk Finance 12(2):121–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hubbard D (2009) The failure of risk management: why it’s broken and how to fix it. Wiley, New York, p 46Google Scholar
  19. Jain PK, Kumar M (1997) Comparative financial management: practices of India and South East Asia. Hindustan Publishing Corporation, New Delhi, pp 43–44Google Scholar
  20. Jain PK, Yadav SS (2000) Financial management practices in select private corporate enterprises – a comparative study of India, Thailand and Singapore. Hindustan Publishing Corporation, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  21. Jain PK, Yadav SS (2005) Financial management practices – a study of public sector enterprises in India. Hindustan Publishing Corporation, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  22. Joshi V (2001) Capital controls and the national advantage: India in the 1990s and beyond. Oxf Dev Stud 29(3):305–320CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Joshi RM (2009) International business. Oxford University Press, New Delhi/New York. ISBN 0195689097Google Scholar
  24. Karunaratne ND (2001) Revisiting capital account convertibility in the aftermath of the currency crisis. Intereconomics 36(5):264–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Khan MY (2011) Indian financial system, 7th edn. Tata McGraw Hill, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  26. KPMG LLC (2001) Understanding enterprise risk management – an emerging model for building shareholder value. KPMG. Available at: Accessed 10 Mar 2006
  27. Lal AK, Clement RW (2005) Economic development in India: the role of individual enterprise (and entrepreneurial spirit). Asia Pac Dev J 12(2):81Google Scholar
  28. Lam J (2001) Risk management – the CRO is here to stay. Prentice-Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  29. Lane PR, Ferretti-Gian MM (2008) International investment patterns. Rev Econ Stat 90(3):538–549CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lensik R (1995) Foreign exchange constraints and developing countries. Econ Model 12(2):179–191CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. MacDonald R (2000) Is the foreign exchange market ‘risky’? Some new survey-based results. J Multinatl Finance Manage 10:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Magnus D, Goran R (2001) Direct foreign ownership, institutional investors, and firm characteristics. J Finance Econ 59:413–440CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Malik F (2003) Sudden changes in variance and volatility persistence in foreign exchange markets. J Multinatl Finance Manage 13:217–230CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Malliaris AG (2002) Global monetary instability: the role of the IMF the EU and NAFTA. North Am J Econ Finance 13:72–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Morris S (1987) Trends in foreign direct investment from India (1950–1982). Econ Pol Wkly 22(46):1963–1969Google Scholar
  36. Nolte I, Pohlmeier W (2007) Using forecasts of forecasters to forecast. Int J Forecast 23:15–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Obadan MI (2006) Globalization of finance and the challenge of national financial sector development. J Asian Econ 17:316–332CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Oberlechner T (2001) Importance of technical and fundamental analysis in the European foreign exchange market. Int J Finance Econ 6:81–93CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rajkumar, Gupta H (2010) FII flows to India: economic indicators. SCMS J Indian Manage 7(1):104–116Google Scholar
  40. Ranganath MD (2011) Risk management for competitive advantage. India Kellogg Wordpress. Available at Accessed 1 Apr 2012
  41. RBI’s Bulletin (2011) Table No. 44 – foreign investment inflows. Available at Accessed 1 Apr 2012
  42. Rekhi (2011) Do our companies understand financial risk? The Hindustan Business Line. Available at: Accessed 1 Apr 2012
  43. Singh J (2010) Economic reforms and foreign direct investment in India: policy, trends and patterns. IUP J Finance Econ VIII(4):59–69Google Scholar
  44. Srinivasan G (2008) Rise in Indian services exports less than global average: WTO. The Hindu Business Line. Available at: Retrieved 16 Nov 2008
  45. Suryanarayana A (2003) Risk management models: a primer. ICFAI Reader. ICFAI Press, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  46. Tai C-S, Iqbal Z (2011) How important is global industry shock in explaining the relative performance of global industries? Manage Finance 37(5):474–481Google Scholar
  47. Templeton L, Deehan A, Taylor C, Drummond C, Strang J (1997) Surveying general practitioners: does a low response rate matter? J Gen Pract 47(415):91–94Google Scholar
  48. Wahab SBA (2003) Globalization and its implications on national security. J R Malays Police Sr Off Coll 27–36. Available at: Accessed 1 Apr 2012
  49. Yadav SS, Jain PK (2000) Corporate practices of risk management in international business operations in India – a survey. S Asian J Manage (SAJM) 7(1–2):1–14Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. K. Jain
    • 1
  • Shveta Singh
    • 1
  • Surendra Singh Yadav
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Management StudiesIndian Institute of TechnologyNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations