Skip to main content

Dividend Policy

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Financial Management Practices

Part of the book series: India Studies in Business and Economics ((ISBE))

  • 2133 Accesses

Abstract

Dividend policy/decision constitutes yet another major financial decision for corporate firms. It relates to the share of dividends to be paid out of profits earned. The company should prefer the decision which has a salutary effect on the wealth of the shareholders. The two major objectives of this chapter are first, to ascertain/identify the practices followed by the sample companies in this regard and second, to assess whether the sample companies follow a stable dividend policy or not.

It is gratifying to note from the 11-year (2001–2011) period of the study that the majority of the sample companies follow stable dividend policy. They seem to follow an approach similar to Lintner’s model. The survey findings on the preference to adopt stable dividend policy (by sectors like oil and gas and ICT amongst others) were in fact more revealing. This practice is in tune with the sound principles of financial management.

The empirical evidence, further, suggests that the sample firms have dividend–payout ratio of much less than 25 % for the entire period of the study perhaps suggesting that the sample consists of companies with good growth opportunities. It is worthwhile to mention here that the dividend–payout ratios have been gradually decreasing over the past two decades (as is evident after comparing results with previous studies, viz., Jain and Kumar (Comparative financial management: practices of India and South East Asia. Hindustan Publishing Corporation, New Delhi, pp 43–44, 1997), Jain and Yadav (Financial management practices in select private corporate enterprises – a comparative study of India. Hindustan Publishing Corporation, India/Thailand/Singapore, 2000, Financial management practices – a study of public sector enterprises in India. Hindustan Publishing Corporation, New Delhi, 2005), perhaps indicating better growth opportunities for companies now, necessitating the ploughing back of cash into the business.

The study has also brought out industry-wise variations, to some extent, as far as dividend policy and practices are concerned. For instance, FMCG and healthcare sectors had high D/P ratios whereas sectors like metals and diversified reported low D/P ratios.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aivazian V, Booth L, Cleary S (2003) Dividend policy and the organization of capital markets. J Multinatl Financ Manage 13:101–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen F, Michaely R (2003) Chapter 7: Payout policy. In: Handbook Econ Finance, vol 1, part 1. Elsevier, Dordrecht, pp 337–429

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaver WH (1968) Market prices, financial ratios, and the prediction of failure. J Account Res 6(2):179–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black FM, Scholes M (1974) The effect of dividend yield and dividend policy on common stock prices and returns. J Financ Econ 1(1):1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brigham EF (1971) Readings in managerial finance. Rinehart and Winston, New York, p 675

    Google Scholar 

  • Chateau JPD (1979) Dividend policy revisited: within and out-of sample tests. J Bus Finance Account 6(3):355–372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins DW, Pincus M, Xie H (1999) Equity valuation and negative earnings: the role of book value of equity. Account Rev 74(1):29–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeAngelo H, DeAngelo L, Stulz RM (2006) Dividend policy and the earned/contributed capital mix: a test of the lifecycle theory. J Financ Econ 81(2):227–254

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Denis DJ, Osobov I (2008) Why do firms pay dividends? International evidence on the determinants of dividend policy. J Financ Econ 89:62–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutta S, Reichelstein S (2004) Stock price, earnings and book value in managerial performance measures. Research paper no. 1873, Research paper series, Stanford Graduate School of Business

    Google Scholar 

  • Fama EF, Babiak H (1968) Dividend policy: an empirical analysis. J Am Stat Assoc 63(4):1132–1161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama EF, French KR (1995) Size and book-to-market factors in earnings and returns. J Finance 50(1):131–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang Lily H, Peress J (2008) Media coverage and the cross-section of stock returns. San Francisco Meetings Paper. J Finance (forthcoming). Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=971202. Accessed April 15, 2011

  • Farinha J (2003) Dividend policy, corporate governance and the managerial entrenchment hypothesis: an empirical analysis. J Bus Finance Account, JEL Classification: G32, G35

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain PK, Kumar M (1997) Comparative financial management: practices of India and South East Asia. Hindustan Publishing Corporation, New Delhi, pp 43–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain PK, Yadav SS (2000) Financial management practices in select private corporate enterprises – a comparative study of India, Thailand and Singapore. Hindustan Publishing Corporation, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain PK, Yadav SS (2005) Financial management practices – a study of public sector enterprises in India. Hindustan Publishing Corporation, New Delhi

    Google Scholar 

  • Jensen GR, Johnson RR, Mercer JF (1997) New evidence on size and price-to-book effects in stock returns. Financ Analysts J 53(6):34–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joy OM (1977) Introduction to financial management. Richard D. Irwin, Skokie, p 274

    Google Scholar 

  • Kester GW et al (1994) Corporate financial policy in the pacific basin; Hong Kong and Singapore. Financ Practice Edu 4(1):118–127

    Google Scholar 

  • Lintner J (1956) Distribution of income of corporations among dividends, retained earnings and taxes. Am Econ Rev 46(2):97–113

    Google Scholar 

  • Menzly L, Ozbas O (2010) Market segmentation and cross-predictability of returns. J Finance 65:1555–1580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller MH, Modigliani F (1961) Dividend policy, growth and the valuation of shares. J Business 34:411–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penman SH (1996) The articulation of price-earnings ratios and market-to-book ratios and the evaluation of growth. J Account Res 34(2):235–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pruitt SW, Gitman LW (1991) The interactions between the investment, financing and dividend decisions of major US firms. Financ Rev 26(33):409–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan TM (1974) Dividend policy and market valuation in British industry. J Bus Finance Account 1(3):57–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shelvin T (1982) Austrian corporate dividend policy: empirical evidence. Account Finance 22(2):1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Short H, Zhang H, Keasey K (2002) The link between dividend policy and institutional ownership. J Corporate Finance 8:105–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon E (1969) Theory of financial management. Columbia University Press, New York, p 142

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter JE (1956) Dividend policies and common stock prices. J Finance 11(1):29–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Appendices

Appendices

Appendix 4.1: Mean, median and quartile values of dividend payout ratio of constituent sectors of the sample companies over phase 1 (2001–2006) and phase 2 (2007–2011)

Sector

Phase 1 (2001–2006)

Phase 2 (2007–2011)

 

Mean

Median

Quartile 1

Quartile 3

Mean

Median

Quartile 1

Quartile 3

Fast-moving consumer goods (FMCG)

43.90

49.89

16.57

68.70

43.55

45.79

18.66

65.90

Transport

28.66

27.56

13.58

38.70

26.62

23.37

15.45

38.26

Healthcare

27.83

25.83

15.16

40.05

26.25

22.51

15.30

32.55

Oil and gas

27.48

31.58

15.27

36.28

23.54

24.78

 9.02

32.36

Miscellaneousa

26.53

23.98

 5.44

41.54

29.70

28.28

16.30

41.21

Capital goods

23.87

19.29

12.27

30.60

19.74

21.03

13.96

24.12

Diversified

20.34

21.44

 5.13

28.20

16.54

17.16

 3.99

23.04

Power

19.33

20.50

 9.50

27.17

20.99

24.93

 2.50

33.53

Internet and communications technology (ICT)

18.39

12.34

 4.58

26.39

20.67

15.73

 5.38

32.40

Housing

16.88

14.87

 2.67

26.17

20.27

11.69

 5.64

24.21

Metals

14.64

13.45

 3.48

20.21

14.72

12.30

 6.25

20.99

  1. aMiscellaneous sectors comprises of the media and publishing sector; agriculture, chemicals and petrochemicals; and tourism, textiles and miscellaneous sectors

Paired samples t-test of constituent sectors of the sample companies based on dividend payout ratio over phase 1 (2001–2006) and phase 2 (2007–2011)

 

Phase 1 and Phase 2

 

t

df

Significance (2-tailed)

Diversified

1.763

8

0.116

Capital goods

1.644

12

0.126

ICT

1.591

17

0.130

Power

−1.095

11

0.297

Housing

1.043

16

0.312

Healthcare

0.881

13

0.395

Oil and gas

0.574

14

0.575

Metals

−0.445

17

0.662

Transport

0.407

16

0.690

Miscellaneous

0.398

15

0.697

FMCG

0.327

11

0.750

Appendix 4.2: Mean, median and quartile values of dividend payout ratio of constituent sectors of the sample companies over phase 3 (2007–2008) and phase 4 (2009–2011)

Sector

Phase 3 (2007–2008)

Phase 4 (2009–2011)

 

Mean

Median

Quartile 1

Quartile 3

Mean

Median

Quartile 1

Quartile 3

FMCG

41.12

44.33

14.78

63.43

44.85

45.79

23.01

66.57

Healthcare

28.00

22.82

12.26

36.34

24.93

22.64

17.62

29.49

Miscellaneous

27.65

25.23

14.49

38.32

31.78

31.37

18.24

43.94

Oil and gas

23.94

22.11

8.82

34.05

22.27

24.43

7.35

30.85

Housing

23.62

 9.24

6.02

21.97

20.43

13.39

7.11

27.12

Transport

23.44

25.36

15.02

31.87

28.26

22.08

14.26

43.11

ICT

22.57

19.01

5.19

33.52

16.27

10.68

2.02

26.66

Power

22.00

26.50

2.00

33.50

19.31

22.20

1.00

32.72

Capital goods

19.97

20.93

11.87

24.58

18.54

21.27

14.17

23.41

Metals

15.78

13.46

5.24

21.34

13.40

10.80

6.52

20.83

Diversified

15.44

14.54

4.03

24.29

17.18

17.31

5.29

22.39

Paired samples t-test of constituent sectors of the sample companies based on dividend payout ratio over phase 3 (2007–2008) and phase 4 (2009–2011)

 

Phase 3 and Phase 4

 

t

df

Significance (2-tailed)

ICT

2.214

17

0.041

Power

2.154

13

0.051

Miscellaneous

−2.040

14

0.061

Capital goods

1.619

12

0.131

Transport

−1.417

17

0.174

Oil and gas

1.136

15

0.274

Metals

0.833

17

0.416

Housing

0.675

17

0.509

Healthcare

0.586

13

0.568

Diversified

−0.525

8

0.614

FMCG

−0.171

11

0.867

Appendix 4.3: ANOVA of the consolidated sample and the constituent sectors of the sample companies based on dividend payout ratio over phase 1 (2001–2006) and phase 2 (2007–2011) and phase 3 (2007–2008) and phase 4 (2009–2011)

Sector

Phase 1 and Phase 2

Phase 3 and Phase 4

 

F

Significance

F

Significance

Consolidated

6.154

0.000

3.392

0.000

Housing

5.544

0.027

0.027

0.871

Capital goods

1.535

0.227

0.485

0.493

ICT

0.547

0.466

0.229

0.636

Diversified

0.335

0.571

0.071

0.794

Miscellaneous

0.272

0.606

0.002

0.961

Metals

0.215

0.647

0.953

0.338

Healthcare

0.071

0.792

0.186

0.670

Oil and gas

0.048

0.828

0.036

0.851

FMCG

0.007

0.935

0.005

0.942

Power

0.000

0.985

0.175

0.679

Transport

0.000

0.989

0.603

0.444

Appendix 4.4: Adherence to stable dividend policy by the constituents sectors of the sample companies (Figures are in percentages)

Sector

2002

2003

2004

2005

2006

2007

2008

2009

2010

2011

Phase1

Phase2

Phase3

Phase4

Capital goods

70.00

90.00

91.67

84.62

53.85

69.23

53.85

41.67

50.00

66.67

78.03

56.28

61.54

52.78

Healthcare

75.00

75.00

83.33

61.54

85.71

78.57

71.43

66.67

69.23

57.14

76.12

68.61

75.00

64.35

Diversified

57.14

85.71

85.71

83.33

66.67

66.67

100.00

66.67

66.67

50.00

75.71

70.00

83.34

61.11

FMCG

37.50

90.00

90.00

80.00

80.00

75.00

58.33

50.00

83.33

33.33

75.50

60.00

66.67

55.55

Metals

58.33

75.00

83.33

92.85

66.67

80.00

62.50

25.00

50.00

56.25

75.24

54.75

71.25

43.75

Housing

70.00

81.82

81.82

83.33

50.00

50.00

92.86

42.86

66.67

43.75

73.39

59.23

71.43

51.09

Miscellaneous

45.45

72.73

76.92

85.71

62.50

43.75

62.50

43.75

87.50

33.33

68.66

54.17

53.13

54.86

Oil and gas

80.00

70.00

70.00

75.00

41.67

76.92

76.92

66.67

75.00

53.85

67.33

69.87

76.92

65.17

Transport

41.67

69.23

85.71

64.29

60.00

81.25

93.75

35.29

76.47

62.50

64.18

69.85

87.50

58.09

Power

50.00

28.57

85.71

75.00

75.00

55.56

77.78

100.00

66.67

77.78

62.86

75.56

66.67

81.48

ICT

54.55

45.45

50.00

50.00

57.14

61.54

78.57

50.00

28.57

33.33

51.43

50.40

70.06

37.30

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer India

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Jain, P.K., Singh, S., Yadav, S.S. (2013). Dividend Policy. In: Financial Management Practices. India Studies in Business and Economics. Springer, India. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-0990-4_4

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics