Capital Budgeting Decisions

  • P. K. Jain
  • Shveta Singh
  • Surendra Singh Yadav
Part of the India Studies in Business and Economics book series (ISBE)


Capital budgeting decisions, being strategic in nature, are likely to have a marked bearing on profitability of corporate business enterprises. The analysis in respect of the sample companies has been carried out on the basis of the two broad parameters: (a) the investment and financing activities of the sample companies and (b) the capital budgeting practices followed by such enterprises.

Capital budgeting practices in India, at least amongst the sample companies, appear to have improved over the past two decades with an increasing number of companies using more sophisticated DCF techniques. A striking finding of the survey is that internal rate of return (IRR) is preferred over the net present value (NPV) method by most of the sample companies, in spite of the superiority of the NPV method. The theory–practice gap is a recurrent theme in the capital budgeting literature, in particular with regard to NPV. Despite the recommendations of the financial literature on using NPV as the primary technique, this research too found that respondent firms indicated a preference for IRR compared to NPV.

As far as the capital expenditure activity is concerned, the sample companies have made substantial investments in acquisition of new fixed assets. It is pertinent as well as satisfactory to note that paucity of funds is not an inhibiting factor in undertaking capital projects by the sample companies. While it is true that the postliberalisation period has witnessed a salubrious effect on their investment activity, the rate of investment in new fixed assets (measured on a year-to-year basis) has been impressive in that it has been at a rate of 18.06 % during the 11-year period (2001–2011) of the study. This is in contrast to the modest figure of less than 5 % recorded for the public sector enterprises (PSEs) over a 13-year period (1991–2003) in a separate study conducted by the authors (Jain and Yadav 2005). Above all, the global recession has not impacted, to a marked extent, the sample companies (representing vital segment of Indian economy).

As far as the financing pattern of long-term investment projects is concerned, it is satisfying to note that the sample companies are following sound policies in this regard – their fixed assets have been financed from long-term sources. Equally commendable is the aspect that their permanent working capital needs have also been financed through long-term sources of finance. This is in conformity with the sound principles of financial management.

Cost of capital constitutes an integral part of capital budgeting proposals. It is encouraging to note that the vast majority of the sample companies follow theoretically sound and conceptually correct basis of computing cost of capital, that is, weighted average cost of capital (WACC). More than two-thirds (67.85 %) of the firms have been following the appropriate WACC basis compared to other methods, suggesting a reduction in the theory–practice gap compared to the past studies. Also, consistent with finance theory, the survey reveals that the sample companies are risk-averse. Sensitivity analysis is the most popular approach used by these companies to incorporate risk in their capital budgeting decisions, followed by shorter payback period method and higher cut-off rate for more risky projects.

Another notable finding is the emergence of new techniques of real options and abandonment options as a part of practice by the sample companies, while evaluating capital budgeting proposals. This perhaps signals the adoption of emerging techniques by the sample companies, an encouraging indication of growing professionalism in their decision-making. Half of the respondent firms (50 %) used real options while evaluating their investment projects. The results are in sharp contrast with other international studies reporting low usages of the same.

Very high fixed-cost components of capital projects and the irregularities in prediction of future cash flows due to decrease in sales and increased competition seem to be the major factors leading to failures of capital budgeting decisions for the sample companies. This is perhaps a reflection of the growing challenges of a volatile global marketplace.


Fixed Asset Capital Budget Discount Cash Flow Discount Cash Flow Sample Company 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Anand M (2002) Corporate finance practices in India: a survey. Vikalpa 27(4):29–56Google Scholar
  2. Antle R, Eppen GD (1985) Capital rationing and organizational slack in capital budgeting. Manage Sci 31(2):163–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bennouna K, Meredith GG, Marchant T (2010) Improved capital budgeting decision making: evidence from Canada. Manage Decis 48(2):225–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Beranek W (1978) Some new capital budgeting theorems. J Finance Quant Anal 13(5):809–823CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berkovitch E, Israel R (2004) Why the NPV criterion does not maximize NPV. Rev Finance Stud 17(1):239–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bierman H (1993) Capital budgeting in 1992: a survey. Finance Manage 22(3):24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Block S (2005) Are there differences in capital budgeting procedures between industries? Eng Econ 50:55–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bombay Stock Exchange (BSE) website., Accessed 1 Apr 2010
  9. Brigham EF, Ehrhardt MC (2002) Financial management: theory and practice, 10th edn. Thompson Learning, Inc., MasonGoogle Scholar
  10. Brounen D, Jong AD, Koedijk CG (2004) Corporate finance in Europe: confronting theory with practice. Finance Manage 33:71–101Google Scholar
  11. Chandra P (1973) Capital budgeting in Indian industries. Indian Manage 12(2):11–15Google Scholar
  12. Chen S (2008) DCF techniques and nonfinancial measures in capital budgeting: a contingency approach analysis. Behav Res Acc 20(1):13–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cherukuri UR (1996) Capital budgeting practices: a comparative study of India and select South East Asian countries. ASCI J Manage 25(2):30–46Google Scholar
  14. Collier PM, Berry AJ (2002) Risk in the process of budgeting. Manage Acc Res 13:273–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cornell B (1999) Risk, duration and capital budgeting: new evidence on some old questions. J Bus 72(2):183–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Economic Surveys of India. Accessed 17 Nov 2011
  17. Fogler HR (1972) Ranking techniques and capital budgeting. Acc Rev 47(1):134–143Google Scholar
  18. Gitman LJ, Forrester JR (1977) A survey of capital budgeting techniques used by major U. S. firms. Finance Manage 6(3):66–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Graham JR, Harvey CR (2001) The theory and practice of corporate finance: evidence from the field. J Finance Econ 60(2–3):187–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hermes N, Smid P, Yao L (2007) Capital budgeting practices: a comparative study of the Netherlands and China. Int Bus Rev 16:630–654CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Jain PK, Kumar M (1997) Comparative financial management: practices of India and South East Asia. Hindustan Publishing Corporation, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  22. Jain PK, Yadav SS (2000) Financial management practices in select private corporate enterprises – a comparative study of India, Thailand and Singapore. Hindustan Publishing Corporation, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  23. Jain PK, Yadav SS (2005) Financial management practices – a study of public sector enterprises in India. Hindustan Publishing Corporation, New DelhiGoogle Scholar
  24. Jog V, Srivastava AK (1995) Capital budgeting practices in corporate Canada. Finance Pract Educ 5(3):387–397Google Scholar
  25. Kester G, Robbins G (2011) The capital budgeting practices of listed Irish companies – insights from CFOs on their investment appraisal techniques. Acc Ireland 43(3):38Google Scholar
  26. Kim DC (1992) Risk preferences in participative budgeting. Acc Rev 67(2):303–318Google Scholar
  27. Kira DS, Kusy MI (1990) A stochastic capital rationing model. J Oper Res Soc 41(9):853–863Google Scholar
  28. Klammer T (1973) The association of capital budgeting techniques with firm performance. Acc Rev 48(2):353–364Google Scholar
  29. Kolb BA (1968) Problems and pitfalls in capital budgeting. Finance Anal J 24(6):170–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kulatilaka N (1985) Capital budgeting and optimal timing of investments in flexible manufacturing systems. Ann Oper Res 3:35–57CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kwan CCY, Yuan Y (1988) Optimal sequential selection in capital budgeting: a shortcut. Finance Manage 17(1):54–59CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lam KC, Wang D, Lam MCK (2007) The capital budgeting evaluation practices of building contractors in Hong Kong. Int J Proj Manage 25:824–834CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lazaridis IT (2004) Capital budgeting practices: a survey of the firms in Cyprus. J Small Bus Manage 42(4):427–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lee Sang M, Lerro AJ (1974) Capital budgeting for multiple objectives. Finance Manage 3(1):58–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mao JCT (1970) Survey of capital budgeting: theory and practice. J Finance 25(2):349–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mohan R (2007) Coping with liquidity management in India: a practitioner’s view. Reserve Bank of India Bulletin. Accessed 19 Oct 2011
  37. Mukherjee TK, Henderson GV (1987) The capital budgeting process: theory and practice. Interfaces 17(2):78–90CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Osborne MJ (2010) A resolution to the NPV–IRR debate? Q Rev Econ Finance 50:234–239CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Pandey IM (1985) The financial leverage in India – a study. Indian Manage 23(3):21–34Google Scholar
  40. Petty JW, Scott DF Jr, Bird MM (1975) The capital expenditure decision making process of the large corporations. Eng Econ 20(3):159–172CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pike RH (1986) The design of capital budgeting processes and the corporate context. Manage Decis Econ 7(3):187–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Pike RH (1996) A longitudinal survey on capital budgeting practices. J Bus Finance Acc 23(1):79–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Pinches GE (1982) Myopia, capital budgeting and decision making. Finance Manage 11(3):6–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Porwal LS, Singhvi SS (1978) A comparative study of capital expenditure evaluation techniques. Long Range Plann 11(5):25–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Reserve Bank of India’s website. Accessed 17 Nov 2011
  46. Ross SA, Westerfield RW, Jaffe JF (2005) Corporate finance, 7th edn. McGraw-Hill Irwin, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  47. Salazar RC, Sen SK (1968) A simulation model of capital budgeting under uncertainty. Manage Sci 15(4):B161–B179CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sandahl G, Sjogren S (2003) Capital budgeting methods among Sweden’s largest groups of companies. The state of the art and a comparison with earlier studies. Int J Prod Econ 84:51–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schall LD, Sundem GL (1980) Capital budgeting methods and risk: a further analysis. Finance Manage 9(1):7–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Schall LD, Sundem GL, William RG Jr (1978) Survey and analysis of capital budgeting methods. J Finance 33(1):281–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Taggart RA (1977) Capital budgeting and the financing decision: an exposition. Finance Manage 6(2):59–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. United Nations Council on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) website. Accessed 17 Nov 2011
  53. Velez I, Nieto G (1986) Investment decision-making practices in Colombia: a survey. Interfaces 16(4):60–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Verbeeten FHM (2006) Do organizations adopt sophisticated capital budgeting practices to deal with uncertainty in the investment decision? Manage Acc Res 17:106–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • P. K. Jain
    • 1
  • Shveta Singh
    • 1
  • Surendra Singh Yadav
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Management StudiesIndian Institute of TechnologyNew DelhiIndia

Personalised recommendations