Wind Power Scenario Tree Tool: Development and Methodology

  • Colm Lowery
  • Mark O’Malley
Part of the Reliable and Sustainable Electric Power and Energy Systems Management book series (RSEPESM)


The nature of power system operation is changing worldwide. Plans are in place to increase the proportion of demand met through wind power throughout the European continent, Ireland, the Great Britain and the United States.


Forecast Error Scenario Tree Unit Commitment Wind Generation Scenario Reduction 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.



This work was conducted in the Electricity Research Centre, University College Dublin, Ireland, which is supported by the Commission for Energy Regulation, Bord Gáis Energy, Bord na Móna Energy, Cylon Controls, EirGrid, Electric Ireland, EPRI, ESB International, ESB Networks, Gaelectric, Intel, SSE Renewables, UTRC and Viridian Power and Energy.

This publication has emanated from research conducted with the financial support of Science Foundation Ireland under grant number 06/CP/E005.


  1. 1.
    Pure power: wind energy targets for 2020 and 2030, EWEA, (2010) Available:
  2. 2.
    Delivering a sustainable energy future for Ireland, Government White Paper (2007) Available:
  3. 3.
    Meeting the energy challenge, U.K. Government White Paper (2007) Available:
  4. 4.
    Second Quarter 2011 Market Report, AWEA. Available:
  5. 5.
    Directive 2009/72/EC of the European Parliament. Available:
  6. 6.
    Troy N, Denny E, O’Malley M (2010) Base-load cycling on a system with significant wind penetration. IEEE Trans Power Syst 25(2):1088–1097Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Marti I et al. (2006) Evaluation of advanced wind power forecasting model results of the anemos project. Available: pp 1088–1097 (2010)
  8. 8.
    Tuohy A, Meibom P, Denny E, O’Malley M (2009) Unit commitment for systems with significant wind penetration. IEEE Trans Power Syst 24(2):592–601Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Takriti S, Birge J, Long E (1996) A stochastic model for the unit commitment problem. IEEE Trans Power Syst 11(3):1497–1508Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Doherty R, O’Malley M (2005) A new approach to quantify reserve demand in systems with significant installed wind capacity. IEEE Trans Power Syst 20:587–595Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hodge B, Orwig K, Milligan M (2012) Examining information entropy approaches as wind power forecasting performance metrics. In: Proceedings of PMAPS IstanbulGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hodge B, Milligan M Wind Power Forecasting Error Distributions over Multiple Timescales (2011) NREL Report No. CP-5500-50614. Available:
  13. 13.
    Wind Power Integration in Liberalised Electricity Markets (WILMAR) Project. Available:
  14. 14.
    Lowery C, O’Malley M (2012) Impact of wind forecast error statistics upon unit commitment. IEEE Trans Sust Energy 3(4):760–768Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hoyland K, Kaut M, Wallace SW (2003) A heuristic for moment-matching scenario generation. Comput Appl Optim 24:169–185Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hoyland K, Wallace SW (2001) Generating scenario trees for multistage decision problems. Manag Sci 47(2):295–307Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Hasche B (2008) Scenario tree generation for an electricity market model. Available:
  18. 18.
    Meibom P, Barth R, Brand H, Swider D, Ravn H, Weber C (2007) All Island Renewable Grid Study Work stream 2b—Wind Variability Management Studies. Available:
  19. 19.
    Lange M, Focken U (2006) Physical approach to short-term wind power prediction. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lange M (2005) On the uncertainty of wind power predictions: analysis of the forecast accuracy and statistical distribution of errors. J Sol Energy Eng 127:177–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Barth R, Soder L, Weber C, Brand H, Swider D (2006) Methodology of the Scenario Tree Tool. Available:
  22. 22.
    Söder L (2004) Simulation of wind speed forecast errors for operation planning of multi-area power systems. In: Proceedings of 8th international conference on probabilistic methods applied to power systems, AmesGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Dupacova J, Growe-Kuska N, Romisch W (2003) Scenario reduction in stochastic programming: an approach using probability metrics. Math Program Ser. A 95, vol 3, pp 493–511Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Heitsch H, Roemisch W (2003) Scenario reduction algorithms in stochastic programming. Comput Appl Optim 24(2–3):187–206Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Valenzuela J, Mazumdar M (2001) Monte-Carlo computation of power generation production costs under operating constraints. IEEE Trans Power Syst 16:671–677CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Electricity Research CentreUniversity College DublinDublin 4Ireland

Personalised recommendations