Urban Landscapes for Carbon Sequestration in Climate Changing Scenario

  • Holalkere Puttaswamy Sumangala


Increasing concern about climate change and global warming has created immense awareness among society about greenhouse gas and its reduction. Irrespective of the geographical location, population density and economic development of any region, there is a huge scope for addressing the greenhouse gas emission. It is, however, an opportunity for the local body to apply the concept of urban green space management for the reduction of atmospheric CO2. Cities have a key role to play in the global agenda for addressing the challenge of climate change. Today, approximately half of the world’s population lives in cities; by 2050, that proportion will probably have increased to two-thirds. India has the highest rate of change of the urban population and will remain above 2% annually for the next three decades. At this rate, an estimated 854 million people will live in Indian cities by 2050. Urban greenery is one of the ways to bridge this gap between urbanisation and nature. Trees and other ornamental plants are crucial to the sequestration of carbon from atmosphere and play an important role in reducing carbon footprint. Urban green spaces constitute critical biodiversity hotspots in densely crowded, concrete-dominated city environments. Even though green spaces play vital role in mitigating the climate change, they remain little studied. The green space needs to be strategically planned. Cultivating urban green spaces is becoming inevitable for clean and green environment in urban areas.


Soil Organic Carbon Carbon Sequestration Green Space Urban Forest Green Roof 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Action Plan (2009–10) Greening Chandigarh, forest department. Chandigarh administration, ChandigarhGoogle Scholar
  2. Alvey AA (2006) Promoting and preserving biodiversity in the urban forest. Urban For Urban Green 5:195–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aminzadeh B, Khansefid M (2010) A case study of urban ecological networks and a sustainable city: Tehran’s metropolitan area. Urban Ecosyst. doi: 10.1007/s11252–009–0101–3
  4. ASCCUE (2012) Adaptation strategies for climate change in the urban environment work package 5 urban greenspace 5. In: Proceedings of 1st biennial international congress on urban green spaces, New Delhi, 5–7 Mar 2012, pp 17–24Google Scholar
  5. Behera G, Nageshwara Rao PP, Dutt CBS, Manikiam B, Balakrishnan P, Krishnamurthy J, Jagadeesh KM, Ganesha Raj K, Diwakar PG, Padmavathy AS, Parvathy R (1985) Growth of Bangalore city since 1990 based on maps and satellite imagery. Technical report, ISRO EOS-TR-55-85. Indian Space Research Organization, BangaloreGoogle Scholar
  6. Botkin DB, Beveridge CE (1997) Cities as environments. Urban Ecosyst 1:3–19CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bowler DE, Buyung-Ali L, Knight TM, Pullin AS (2010) Urban greening to cool towns and cities: a systematic review of the empirical evidence. Landsc Urban Plan 97:147–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brethour C and Watson G et al (2007) Literature review of documented health and environmental benefits derived from ornamental horticulture products, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada markets and trade, OttawaGoogle Scholar
  9. Broadmeadow M (2006) Presentation to natural England workshop on carbon managementGoogle Scholar
  10. Broadmeadow M, Matthews R (2003) Forest, carbon and climate change: the UK contribution. Forestry Commission Information Note 48Google Scholar
  11. Brown S, Swingland I, Hanbury-Tension R, Prance G, Myers N (2001) Carbon sinks for abating climate change: can they work? Center for environment and society, University of Essex, EssexGoogle Scholar
  12. Chaudhry P (2006) Valuing recreational benefits of urban forestry – a case study of Chandigarh city. Doctorate thesis. FRI Deemed University, DehradunGoogle Scholar
  13. Chaudhry P, Tewari VP (2010a) Managing urban parks and gardens in developing countries: a case from Chandigarh India. Int J Leis Tourism Market 1:248–256CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chaudhry P, Tewari VP (2010b) Environmental education using Nek Chand’s Rock Garden in the City of Chandigarh. Int J Environ Sustainable Dev 9(1):30–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Clarke KM, Fisher BL, LeBuhn G (2008) The influence of urban park characteristics on ant (Hymenoptera, Formicidae) communities. Urban Ecosyst 11:317–334CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Contant RT, Paustian K, Elliott ET (2001) Grassland management and conversion into grassland: effects on soil carbon. App Ecol 11:343–355CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cornelis J, Hermy M (2004) Biodiversity relationships in urban and suburban parks in Flanders. Landsc Urban Plan 69:385–401CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Davies RG, Barbosa O, Fuller RA, Tratalos J, Burke N, Lewis D, Warren PH, Gaston KJ (2008) City-wide relationships between green spaces, urban land use and topography. Urban Ecosyst 11:269–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dubey SK, Pandey DN (1993) The effect of afforestation on the abundance and diversity of birds. In: Dwivedi AP, Gupta GN (eds) Afforestation of arid lands. Scientific Publishers, Jodhpur, pp 313–320Google Scholar
  20. Dwivedi P, Rathore CS, Dubey Y (2009) Ecological benefits of urban forestry: the case of Kerwa Forest Area (KFA), Bhopal, India. Appl Geogr 29(2):194–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fernández-Juricic E, Jokimäki J (2001) A habitat island approach to conserving birds in urban landscapes: case studies from southern and northern Europe. Biodivers Conserv 10:2023–2043CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. FSI (2009) State of forest report 2009. Forest survey of India, Ministry of environment & forests, DehradunGoogle Scholar
  23. Gill S, Pauleit S, Ennos AR, Lindley SJ, Handley JF, Gwilliam J, Ueberjahn-Tritta A (2004) Literature review Impacts of climate change on urban environments. CURE, University of Manchester, ManchesterGoogle Scholar
  24. Gill S, Handley J, Ennos R, Pauleit S (2007) Adapting cities for climate change: the role of the green infrastructure. J Built Environ 33:115–133CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Goode D (2006) Green infrastructure: report to the royal commission on environmental pollutionGoogle Scholar
  26. Gupta RB, Chaudhari PR, Wate SR (2008) Floristic diversity in urban forest area of NEERI Campus, Nagpur, Maharashtra (India). J Environ Sci Eng 50(1):55–62PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Jim CY, Chen WY (2008) Assessing the ecosystem service of air pollutant removal by urban trees in Guangzhou. J Environ Manage 88:665–676PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Jim CY, Chen WY (2009) Diversity and distribution of landscape trees in the compact Asian city of Taipei. Appl Geogr 29:577–587CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jim CY, Liu HT (2001) Patterns and dynamics of urban forests in relation to land use and development history in Guangzhou City, China. Geogr J 167:358–375CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Khera N, Mehta V, Sabata BC (2009) Interrelationship of birds and habitat features in urban greenspaces in Delhi, India. Urban For Urban Green 8(3):187–196CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. LCCP (2006) Adapting to climate change: lessons for London. GLA, LondonGoogle Scholar
  32. Loesner G (1978) An air quality planning program with visible results. Practising PlannerGoogle Scholar
  33. Long AJ, Nair PKR (1999) Trees outside forests: agro, community, and urban forestry. New For 17:145–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. McKinney ML (2008) Effects of urbanization on species richness: a review of plants and animals. Urban Ecosyst 11:161–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mhatre N (2008) Secret lives: biodiversity of the Indian Institute of Science Campus. Indian Institute of Science Press, BangaloreGoogle Scholar
  36. Nagendra H, Gopal D (2010) Street trees in Bangalore: density, diversity, composition and distribution. Urban For Urban Green. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2009.1012.1005
  37. National Urban Forestry Unit (2005) Trees matter: bringing lasting benefits to people in towns.
  38. Nowak DJ, Crane DE, Stevens JC (2006) Air pollution removal by urban trees and shrubs in the United States. Urban For Urban Green 4:115–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Oleyar MD, Greve AI, Withey JC, Bjorn AM (2008) An integrated approach to evaluating urban forest functionality. Urban Ecosyst 11:289–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Patwardhan A, Nalavade S, Sahasrabuddhe K, Utkarsh G (2001) Urban wildlife and protected areas in India. Parks 11(3):28–34Google Scholar
  41. Qian Y, Follett RF (2002) Assessing soil carbon sequestration in turfgrass systems using long-term soil testing data. Agron J 94:930–935CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Qian YL, Follet R (2010) Soil organic carbon input from urban turfgrasses. Soil Sci Soc Am J 74:366–371CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Selhorst AL (2007) Carbon sequestration and emissions due to golf course turfgrass development and maintenance in central Ohio. M.S. thesis, The Ohio state university, ColumbusGoogle Scholar
  44. Singh VS, Pandey DN, Chaudhry P (2010) Urban forests and open green spaces: lessons for Jaipur, Rajasthan, India. RSPCB Occasional paper no. 1/2010, Rajasthan state Pollution Control Board, Rajasthan, India.
  45. Sudha P, Ravindranath NH (2000) A study of Bangalore urban forest. Lands Urban Plan 47:47–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Upmanis (2000) The park has its own climate. Swedish Build Res 2:8–10Google Scholar
  47. Verma SS (1985) Spatio-temporal study of open spaces of part of Jaipur City-Rajasthan. J Indian Soc Remote Sensing 13(1):9–16Google Scholar
  48. Weifeng L, Zhiyun O, Xuesong M, Xiaoke W (2006) Plant species composition in relation to green cover configuration and function of urban parks in Beijing, China. Ecol Res 21:221–237CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Whitford V et al. (2001) City form and natural processes – indicators for ecological performance of urban areas and their application for Merseyside, UKGoogle Scholar
  50. Yang J, McBride J, Zhou J, Sun Z (2005) The urban forest in Beijing and its role in air pollution reduction. Urban For Urban Green 3:65–78CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zerah M-H (2007) Conflict between green space preservation and housing needs: the case of the Sanjay Gandhi ́National Park in Mumbai. Cities 24(2):122–132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zirkle GN (2010) Assessment of carbon sequestration in the U.S. residential landscape. M.S. thesis. The Ohio State University. ColumbusGoogle Scholar
  53. Zirkle G, LAl R, Augustin B (2011) Modeling carbon sequestration in home lawns. Hortic Sci 46(5):808–814Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Indian Institute of Horticultural ResearchBengaluruIndia

Personalised recommendations