Advertisement

Genetic Enhancement of Tomato Crop for Abiotic Stress Tolerance

  • Avverahally Thamanna Sadashiva
  • Manohar George Christopher
  • Thilakadavu Krishnamurthy Krithika
Chapter

Abstract

India being the second largest producer of tomato will still fall short of the country’s requirement. The main concern is the decreasing productivity due to negative effects of environmental stresses. Production of tomato is subjected to many abiotic stresses, mainly heat and drought. In order to sustain tomato production with present day challenges, we need to have a thorough knowledge of the plant’s reaction toward the stress and develop sufficient genetically enhanced varieties or hybrids which are tolerant and capable of mitigating the stress. Here we have made an attempt to address the challenge thrown to the breeders by the changing climatic scenario.

Keywords

Drought Stress Heat Stress Fruit Development Tomato Fruit Cherry Tomato 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Abdalla AA, Verkerk K (1968) Growth, flowering and fruit-set of the tomato at high temperature. Neth J Agric Sci 16:71–76Google Scholar
  2. Abdelmageed AH, Gruda N, Geyer B (2003) Effect of high temperature and heat shock on tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum M.) genotypes under controlled conditions. Conference on international agricultural research or development. Deutscher ropentag, Göttingen, Oct 8–10Google Scholar
  3. Abdul-Baki A (1991) Tolerance of tomato cultivars and selected germplasm to heat stress. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 116:1113–1116Google Scholar
  4. Adams P (1990) Effects of watering on the yield, quality and composition of tomatoes grown in bags of peat. J Hortic Sci 65(6):667–674Google Scholar
  5. Adams SR, Valdés VM (2002) The effect of periods of high temperature and manipulating fruit load on the pattern of tomato yields. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 77:461–466Google Scholar
  6. Adams SR, Cockshull KE, Cave CRJ (2001a) Effect of temperature on the growth and development of tomato fruits. Ann Bot 88:869–877CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Adams SR, Valdes VM, Cave CRJ, Fenlon JS (2001b) The impact of changing light levels and fruit load on the pattern of tomato yields. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 76:368–373Google Scholar
  8. Ainsworth EA, Rogers A, Leakey ADB (2008) Targets for crop biotechnology in a future high-CO2 and high-O3 world. Plant Physiol 147:13–19PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Araki T, Kitano M, Equchi H (2000) Dynamics of fruit growth and photoassimilation translocation in tomato plant under controlled environment. Acta Hortic 534:85–92Google Scholar
  10. Bar-Tsur A, Rudich J, Bravdo B (1985) High temperature effects on CO2 gas exchange in heat-tolerant and sensitive tomatoes. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 110:582–586Google Scholar
  11. Berry SZ, Uddin MR (1988) Effect of high temperature on fruit-set in tomato cultivars and selected germplasm. HortScience 23:606–608Google Scholar
  12. Bhagavanthagoudra KH (2000) Studies on water and nutrient management in cabbage (Brassica oleracea var. capitata L.) cv. Pride of India. Ph. D. thesis, University of Agricultural Sciences, DharwadGoogle Scholar
  13. Blum A (1996) Constitutive traits affecting plant performance under stress. In: Edmeades GO, Banziger M, Mickelson HR, Pena-Valdivia CB (eds) Developing drought and low N tolerant maize, pp 131–35. Proceedings of the symposium. Cimmyt, MexicoGoogle Scholar
  14. Bonhert HJ, Gong Q, Li P, Ma S (2006) Unraveling abiotic stress tolerance mechanisms –getting genomics going. Curr Opin Plant Biol 9:180–188CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Boyer JS (1982) Plant productivity and environment. Science 218:443–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bray EA, Bailey-Serres J, Weretilnyk E (2000) Responses to abiotic stresses. In: Gruissem W, Buchannan B, Jones R (eds) Biochemistry and molecular biology of plants. American Society of Plant Physiologists, Rockville, pp 1158–1249Google Scholar
  17. Brock MT, Galen C (2005) Drought tolerance in the alpine dandelion, Taraxacum ceratophorum (Asteraceae), its exotic congener T. officinale, and interspecific hybrids under natural and experimental conditions. Am J Bot 92:1311–1321PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Caird MA, Richards JH, Donovan LA (2007a) Night-time stomatal conductance and transpiration in C3 and C4 plants. Plant Physiol 143:4–10PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Caird MA, Richards JH, Hsiao TC (2007b) Significant transpirational water loss occurs throughout the night in field-grown tomato. Funct Plant Biol 34:172–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Ceccarelli S, Grando S (1996) Drought as a challenge for the plant breeder. Plant Growth Regul 20:149–155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Charles WB, Harris RE (1972) Tomato fruit-set at high and low temperatures. Can J Plant Sci 52:497–506CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Chaves MM, Maroco JP, Pereira JS (2003) Understanding plant responses to drought – from genes to the whole plant. Funct Plant Biol 30:239–264CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Colla G, Casa R, Lo Cascio B, Saccardo F, Leoni C, Temperini O (1999) Response for processing tomato to water regimes and fertilization in central Italy. Acta Hortic 487:531–535Google Scholar
  24. Dalal KB, Salunkhe DK, Olson LE, Do JY, Yu MH (1968) Volatile components of developing tomato fruit grown under field and greenhouse conditions. Plant Cell Physiol 9:389–400Google Scholar
  25. Dane F, Hunter AG, Chambliss OL (1991) Fruit set, pollen fertility, and combining ability of selected tomato genotypes under high temperature field conditions. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 116:906–910Google Scholar
  26. de Koning A (1988) The effect of different day/night temperature regimes on growth, development and yield of glasshouse tomatoes. J Hortic Sci 63:465–471Google Scholar
  27. de Koning A (1989) The effect of temperature on fruit growth and fruit load of tomato. Acta Hortic 248:29–337Google Scholar
  28. de Koning A (1990) Long-term temperature integration of tomato. Growth and development under alternating temperature regimes. Sci Hortic 45:117–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Dinar M, Rudich J (1985) Effect of heat stress on assimilate partitioning in tomato. Ann Bot 56:239–248Google Scholar
  30. Doorenbos J, Kassam AH (1979) Yield response to water. FAO irrigation and drainage paper, vol 33. FAO, Rome, p 157Google Scholar
  31. Dudley SA (1996) Differing selection on plant physio­logical traits in response to environmental water ­availability: a test of adaptive hypotheses. Evolution 50:92–102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. El Ahmadi AB, Stevens MA (1979) Reproductive responses of heat-tolerant tomatoes to high temperatures. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 104:686–691Google Scholar
  33. FAO STAT (2010) http://faostat.fao.org/site/567/default.aspx#ancorGoogle Scholar
  34. Firon N, Shaked R, Peet MM, Phari DM, Zamskı E, Rosenfeld K, Althan L, Pressman NE (2006) Pollen grains of heat tolerant tomato cultivars retain higher carbohydrate concentration under heat stress conditions. Sci Hortic 109:212–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Foolad MR (2005) Recent development in stress tolerance breeding in tomato. In: Ashraf M, Harris PJC (eds) Abiotic stresses: plant resistance through breeding and molecular approaches. The Haworth Press Inc., New York, pp 613–684Google Scholar
  36. Gautier H, Rocci A, Buret M, Grasselly D, Causse M (2005) Fruit load or fruit position alters response to temperature and subsequently cherry tomato quality. J Sci Food Agric 85:1009–1016CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Geisenberg C, Stewart K (1986) Field crop management. In: Atherton JG, Rudich J (eds) The tomato crop. Chapman & Hall, London, pp 511–557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Grimstad SO (1995) Low-temperature pulse affects growth and development of young cucumber and tomato plants. J Hortic Sci 70:75–80Google Scholar
  39. Guichard S, Bertin N, Leonard C, Gary C (2001) Tomato fruit quality in relation to water and carbon fluxes. Agronomie 21:385–392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Hanna YH, Hernandez TP (1982) Response of six tomato genotypes under the summer and spring weather conditions in Louisiana. HortScience 17:758–759Google Scholar
  41. Haque MA, Hossain AKMA, Ahmed KU (1999) A comparative study on the performance of different varieties of tomato. II. Varietal response of different seasons and temperature in respect of yield and yield components. Bangladesh Hortic 26:39–45Google Scholar
  42. Helyes L, Varga C, Dime’ny J, Pe’k Z (1999) The simultaneous effect of variety, irrigation and weather on tomato yield. Acta Hortic 487:499–505Google Scholar
  43. Ho LC, Hewitt JD (1986) Fruit development. In: Atherton JG, Rudich J (eds) The tomato crop. A scientific basis for improvement. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 201–239PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Ho LC (1996) The mechanism of assimilate partitioning and carbohydrate compartmentation in fruit in relation to the quality and yield of tomato. J Exp Bot 47:1239–1243PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Hodges L, Steinegger D (1991) Blossom end rot in tomato, Nebraska cooperative extension NF91-43. University of Nebraska, LincolnGoogle Scholar
  46. Hoekstra FA, Golovina EA, Buitink J (2001) Mechanisms of plant desiccation tolerance. Trends Plant Sci 6:431–438PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hurd RG, Cooper AJ (1970) The effect of early low temperature treatment on the yield of single-inflorescence tomatoes. J Hortic Sci 45:19–27Google Scholar
  48. Hurd RG, Graves CJ (1984) The influence of different temperature patterns having the same integral on the earliness and yield of tomatoes. Acta Hortic 148:547–554Google Scholar
  49. Hurd RG, Graves CJ (1985) Some effects of air and root temperatures on the yield and quality of glasshouse tomatoes. J Hortic Sci 60:359–371Google Scholar
  50. Imada CT, Wagner WL, Herbst DR (1989) Checklist of native and naturalized flowering plants of Hawai’i Bishop. Mus Occas Pap 29:31–87Google Scholar
  51. Ingram J, Bartels D (1996) The molecular basis of dehydration tolerance in plants. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 47:377–403PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Iwahori S (1965) High temperature injuries in tomato. Development of normal flower buds and morphological abnormalities of flower buds treated with high temperature. J Jpn Soc Hortic Sci 34:33–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Iwahori S (1966) High temperature injuries in tomato. Fertilization and development of embryo with special reference to the abnormalities caused by high temperature. J Jpn Soc Hortic Sci 35:55–62Google Scholar
  54. Iwahori S, Takahashi K (1964) High temperature injuries in tomato. Effects of high temperature on flower buds and flowers of different stages of development. J Jpn Soc Hortic Sci 33:67–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Jaleel CA, Manivannan P, Wahid A, Farooq M, Somasundaram R, Panneerselvam R (2009) Drought stress in plants: a review on morphological characteristics and pigments composition. Int J Agric Biol 11:100–105Google Scholar
  56. Johnson SP, Hall WC (1953) Vegetative and fruiting responses of tomatoes to high temperature and light intensity. Bot Gaz 114:449–460CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Juenger TE, McKay JK, Hausmann N, Keurentjes JJB, Sen S, Stowe KA, Dawson TE et al (2005) Identification and characterization of QTL underlying whole-plant physiology in Arabidopsis thaliana: δ 13 C, stomatal conductance and transpiration efficiency. Plant Cell Environ 28:697–708CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Kebede H, Martin B, Nienhuis J, King G (1994) Leaf anatomy of two Lycopersicon species with contrasting gas exchange properties. Crop Sci 34:108–113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Khayat E, Ravad D, Zieslin N (1985) The effects of various night- temperature regimes on the vegetative growth and fruit production of tomato plants. Sci Hortic 27:9–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Kramer PJ, Boyer JS (1995) Water relations of plants and soils. Academic, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  61. Kuo CG, Chen BW, Chou MH, Tsai CL, Tsay TS (1979) Tomato fruit-set at high temperatures, pp 94–109. In: Cowell R (ed) Proceedings of first international symposium on tropical tomato. Asian Vegetable Research Development Centre, ShanhuaGoogle Scholar
  62. Lapushner D, Frankel R, Fuchus Y (1986) Tomato cultivar response to water and salt stress. Acta Hortic 190:247–252Google Scholar
  63. Levin DA (2005) Niche shifts: the primary driver of novelty within angiosperm genera. Syst Bot 30:9–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Levy A, Rabinowitch HD, Kedar N (1978) Morphological and physiological characters affecting flower drop and fruit set of tomatoes at high temperatures. Euphytica 27:211–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Losada HP, Rincaon R (1994) Influence of the crop water status on fruit setting and final fruit number in the processing tomato crop. Acta Hortic 376:333–336Google Scholar
  66. Ludlow MM (1989) Strategies in response to water stress. In: Kreeb HK, Richter H, Hinckley TM (eds) Structural and functional responses to environmental stresses: water shortage. Academic Press, The Netherlands, pp 269–281Google Scholar
  67. Ludlow MM, Muchow RC (1990) A critical evaluation of traits for improving crop yields in water-limited environments. Adv Agron 43:107–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Lurie S, Handros A, Fallik E, Shapira R (1996) Reversible inhibition of tomato fruit gene expression at high temperature. Plant Physiol 110:1207–1214PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Maldonado C, Squeo FA, Ibacache E (2003) Phenotypic response of Lycopersicon chilense to water deficit. Revista Chilena Historia Nat 76:129–137Google Scholar
  70. Martin B, Tauer CG, Lin RK (1999) Carbon isotope discrimination as a tool to improve water-use efficiency in tomato. Crop Sci 39:1775–1783CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. May DM (1993) Moisture stress to maximize processing tomato yield and quality. Acta Hortic 335:547–552Google Scholar
  72. McKay JK, Bishop JG, Lin JZ, Richards JH, Sala A, Mitchell-Olds T (2001) Local adaptation across a climatic gradient despite small effective population size in the rare sapphire rock cress. Proc R Soc London B Biol Sci 268:1715–1721CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. McKay JK, Richards JH, Mitchell-Olds T (2003) Genetics of drought adaptation in Arabidopsis thaliana: I Pleiotropy contributes to genetic correlations among ecological traits. Mol Ecol 12:1137–1151PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Michelakis NG, Chartzoulakis KS (1988) Water consumptive use of greenhouse tomatoes as related to various levels of soil water potential under drip irrigation. Acta Horticulturae 288:127–136Google Scholar
  75. Mulholland BJ, Edmondson RN, Fussell M, Basham J, Ho LC (2003) Effects of high temperature on tomato summer fruit quality. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol 78:365–374Google Scholar
  76. Nakazato T, Bogonovich M, Moyle LC (2008) Environmental factors predict adaptive phenotypic differentiation within and between two wild Andean tomatoes. Evolution 62–4:774–792CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. O’Connell MA, Medina AL, Sanchez-Pena P, Trevino MB (2007) Molecular genetics of drought resistance response in tomato and related species. In: Razdan MK, Mattoo AK (eds) Genetic Improvement of Solanaceouscrops, vol 2, Tomato. Science, Enfield, pp 261–283Google Scholar
  78. Peet MM, Sato S, Gardner RG (1988) Comparing heat stress on male-fertile and male-sterile tomatoes to chronic, sub-acute high temperature stress. J Exp Bot 21(2):225–231Google Scholar
  79. Peet MM, Willits DH, Gardner RG (1997) Responses of ovule development and post pollen production processes in male-sterile tomatoes to chronic, sub-acute high temperature stress. J Exp Bot 48:101–111CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Pressman E, Peet MM, Phar DM (2002) The Effect of heat stress on tomato pollen characteristics is associated with changes in carbohydrate concentration in developing anthers. Ann Bot 90:631–636PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Rahman SML, Natwata E, Sakuratani T (1999) Effect of water stress on growth, yield and eco-physiological responses of four (Lycopersicon esculentum. Mill) tomato cultivars. J Jpn Soc Hortic Sci 68(3):499–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Ramanjulu S, Bartels D (2002) Drought- and desiccation-induced modulation of gene expression in plants. Plant Cell Environ 25:141–151PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Reid JB, Winfield D, Sorensen I, Kale AJ (1996) Water deficit, root demography, and the causes of internal blackening in field grown tomatoes (Lycopersicon esculentum. Mill). Ann Appl Biol 129(1):137–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Richards RA (1996) Defining selection criteria to improve yield under drought. Plant Growth Regul 20:157–166CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Rick CM (1973) Potential genetic resources in tomato species: clues from observation in native habitats. In: Srb AM (ed) Genes, enzymes and populations. Plenum, New York, pp 255–269CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Rudich J, Luchinsky U (1986) Water economy. In: Atherton JG, Rudich J (eds) The tomato crop. A scientific basis for improvement. Chapman and Hall Ltd, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  87. Rudich J, Zamski E, Regev Y (1977) Genotype variation for sensitivity to high temperature in the tomato: pollination and fruit set. Et Gaz 138:448–452CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Rylski I (1979a) Effect of temperatures and growth regulators on fruit malformation in tomato. Scientia Hortic 10:27–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Rylski I (1979b) Fruit set and development of seeded and seedless tomato fruits under diverse regimes of temperature and pollination. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 104:835–838Google Scholar
  90. Samuel K, Paliwal K (1994) Effect of water stress on water relations, photosynthesis, and element content of tomato. Plant Physiol Biochem (New Delhi) 21(1):33–37Google Scholar
  91. Sánchez Peña P (1999) Leaf water potentials in tomato (L. esculentum Mill.) L. chilense Dun. and their interspecific F1. M.Sc., thesis, New Mexico State University, Las CrucesGoogle Scholar
  92. Sanders DC, Howell TA, Hile MMS, Hodges L, Meek D, Phene CJ (1989) Yield and quality of processing tomatoes in response to irrigation rate and schedule. J Am Sco Hortic Sci 114(6):904–908Google Scholar
  93. Santarius KA, Engelbert Weis (1988) Heat stress and membranes. In: Harwood JL, Walton TJ (eds) Plant membranes – structure, assembly and function. The Biochemical Society, London, pp 97–112Google Scholar
  94. Sato S, Peet MM, Thomas JF (2000) Physiological factors limit fruit set of tomato (lycopersicon esculentum mill.) under chronic mild heat stress. Plant Cell Environ 23:719–726CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Sato S, Peet MM, Gardner RG (2001) Formation of parthenocarpic fruit, undeveloped flowers and aborted flowers in tomato under moderately elevated temperatures. Scientia Hortic 90:243–254CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Sato S, Peet MM, Thomas JF (2002) Determining critical pre- and post- anthesis periods and physiological ­processes in Lycopersicon esculentum Mill. exposed to moderately elevated temperatures. J Exp Bot 53:1187–1195PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Sato S, Kamiyama M, Iwata T, Makita N, Furukawa H, Ikeda H (2006) Moderate increase of mean daily temperature adversely affects fruit set of Lycopersicon esculentum by disrupting specific physiological processes in male reproductive development. Ann Bot 97:731–738PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Sauser B (1998) Modeling the effects of air temperature perturbations for control of tomato plant development. M.S. thesis. Rutgers University, NJ, p 106Google Scholar
  99. Sawhney VK, Polowick PL (1985) Fruit development in tomato: the role of temperature. Can J Bet 63:1031–1034CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Schluter D (2001) Ecology and the origin of the species. Trends Ecol Evol 16:372–380PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Schonfeld MA, Johnson RC, Carver BD, Mornhinweg DW (1988) Water relations in heat as drought resistance indicators. Crop Sci 28:526–531CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Scott JW, Volin RB, Bryan HH, Olson SM (1986) Use of hybrids to develop heat tolerant tomato cultivars. Proc Fla State Hortic Soc 99:311–315Google Scholar
  103. Sharma KK, Lavanya M (2002) Recent developments in transgenics for abiotic stress in legumes of the semi-arid tropics. In: Ivanaga M (ed) Genetic engineering of crop plants for abiotic stress, working report no. 23, JIRCAS, Tsukuba, pp 61–73Google Scholar
  104. Shen ZY, Li PH (1982) Heat adaptability of the tomato. HortScience 17:924–925Google Scholar
  105. Shi H, Quintero FJ, Pardo JM, Zhu JK (2002) The putative plasma membrane Na(+)/H(+) antiporter SOS1 controls long-distance Na(+) transport in plants. Plant Cell 14:465–477PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Shilpi Mahajan, Narendra Tuteja (2005) Minireview : cold, salinity and drought stresses: an overview. Arch Biochem Biophys 444:139–158Google Scholar
  107. Shinohara Y, Akiba K, Maruo T, Ito T (1995) Effect of water stress on the fruit yield, quality and physiological condition of tomato plants using the gravel culture. Acta Horticulturae 396:211–218Google Scholar
  108. Silva WLC, Marouelli WA (1996) Evaluation of irrigation scheduling techniques for processing tomatoes in Brazil. In: Proceedings of the international conference on evapotranspiration and irrigation scheduling. ASAE, St. Joseph, pp 522–526Google Scholar
  109. Stevens MA, Rudich J (1978) Genetic potential for overcoming physiological limitations on adaptability, yield, and quality of the tomato. HortScience 13:673–679Google Scholar
  110. Stevens MA, Kader AA, Albright-Holton M, Algazi M (1977) Genotype variation for flavour and composition in fresh market tomatoes. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 102(5):680–689Google Scholar
  111. Sugiyama T, Iwahori S, Takahashi K (1966) Effect of high temperature on fruit setting of tomato under cover. Acta Hortic 4:63–69Google Scholar
  112. Tanaka A, Fujita K, Kikuchi K (1974) Nutrio-physiological studies on the tomato plant: photosynthetic rates of individual leaves in relation to the dry matter production in plants. Soil Sci Plant Nutr 20:173–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. Thomas JMG, Prasad PVV (2003) Plants and the environment /global warming effects. University of Florida, GainesvilleGoogle Scholar
  114. Torrecillas A, Guillaume C, Alarc ó n JJ, Ruizs á nchez MC (1995) Water relations of 2 tomato species under water-stress and recovery. Plant Sci 105:169–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. Veit-Kohler U, Krumbein A, Kosegarten H (1999) Effect of different water supply on plant growth and fruit quality of Lycopersicon esculentum. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 162(6):583–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  116. Villareal RL, Lai SH (1979). Development of heat tolerant tomato varieties in the tropics. In: Proceedings of the first international symposium on tropical tomato, Shanhua, pp 188–200, 23–27 Oct 1978Google Scholar
  117. Walker AJ, Ho LC, Baker DA (1978) Carbon translocation in the tomato: pathway to carbon metabolism and the rate of translocation. Ann Bot 42:901–909Google Scholar
  118. Wang X-Q, Ullah H, Jones A, Assmann S (2001) G protein regulation of ion channels and abscisic acid ­signaling in Arabidopsis guard cells. Science 292:2070–2072PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. Weaver ML, Timm H (1989) Screening tomato for high-temperature tolerance through pollen viability tests. HortScience 24:493–495Google Scholar
  120. Weis E, Berry JA (1988) Plants and high temperature stress. In: Long SP, Woodward FI (eds) Plants and temperature. Symposia of the society for experimental biology, no.42. The Company of Biologists Limited, Cambridgem, pp 329–346Google Scholar
  121. Went FW, Hull HM (1949) The effect of temperature upon translocation of carbohydrates in the tomato plant. Plant Physiol 24:505–526PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Wessel-Beaver L, Scott JW (1992) Genetic variability of fruit set, fruit weight, and yield in a tomato population grown in two high-temperature environments. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 117:867–870Google Scholar
  123. Yakir D, Sadovski A, Rabinowitch HD, Rudich J (1984) Effect of high temperature on quality of processing tomatoes of various genotypes ripened off the vine. Sci Hortic 23:323–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Zhang J, Schurr U, Davies WJ (1987) Control of stomatal behavior by abscisic acid which apparently originates in roots. J Exp Bot 38:1174–1181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. Zushi K, Matsuzoe N (1998) Effect of soil water deficit on vitamin C, sugar, organic acid amino acid and carotene contents of large fruited tomatoes. J Jpn Soc Hortic Sci 67(6):927–933CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Avverahally Thamanna Sadashiva
    • 1
  • Manohar George Christopher
    • 1
  • Thilakadavu Krishnamurthy Krithika
    • 1
  1. 1.Division of Vegetable CropsIndian Institute of Horticultural ResearchBangaloreIndia

Personalised recommendations