Advertisement

Marker-Assisted Selection

  • N. Manikanda Boopathi
Chapter

Abstract

Conventional plant breeding is largely dependent on selection of desirable plants which is highly decided by the genotype and environment interaction. Selecting plants in a segregating progeny that contain appropriate combinations of genes is a critical component of plant breeding. Usually, breeders improve crops by crossing plants with desired traits, such as high yield or disease resistance, and selecting the best offspring over multiple generations of testing under multi-location trials. Thus, to develop a new variety, it may take 10–15 years. Any technique that may speed up this process or make it more efficient is really a boon to breeders.

Keywords

Recurrent Parent Phenotypic Evaluation Target Trait Background Selection Donor Allele 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Bibliography

Literature Cited

  1. Beckmann JS, Soller M (1986) Restriction fragment length polymorphisms in plant genetic improvement. Oxford Surv Plant Mol Cell Biol 3:197–246Google Scholar
  2. Bonnett DG, Rebetzke GJ, Spielmeyer W (2005) Strategies for efficient implementation of molecular markers in wheat breeding. Mol Breed 15:75–85CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Dreher K, Khairallah M, Ribaut JM, Morris M (2003) Money matters (I): costs of field and laboratory procedures associated with conventional and marker-assisted maize breeding at CIMMYT. Mol Breed 11:221–234CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Morris M, Dreher K, Ribaut JM, Khairallah M (2003) Money matters (II): costs of maize inbred line conversion schemes at CIMMYT using conventional and marker-assisted selection. Mol Breed 11:235–247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  1. Tanksley SD, Nelson JC (1996) Advanced backcross QTL analysis: a method for the simultaneous discovery and transfer of valuable QTLs from unadapted germplasm into elite breeding lines. Theor Appl Genet 92:191–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Further Readings

  1. Beavis WD (1998) QTL analysis: power, precision, and accuracy. In: Paterson AH (ed) Molecular dissection of complex traits. CRC Press, Boca Raton, pp 145–161Google Scholar
  2. Frisch M, Melchinger AE (2001) Marker-assisted backcrossing for introgression of a recessive gene. Crop Sci 41:1485–1494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Frisch M, Bohn M, Melchinger AE (1999a) Minimum sample size and optimal positioning of flanking markers in marker-assisted backcrossing for transfer of a target gene. Crop Sci 39:967–975CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Frisch M, Bohn M, Melchinger AE (1999b) Comparison of selection strategies for marker-assisted backcrossing of a gene. Crop Sci 39:1295–1301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Frisch M et al (2000) PLABSIM: software for simulation of marker-assisted backcrossing. J Hered 91:86–87PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hospital F (2003) Marker-assisted breeding. In: Newbury HJ (ed) Plant molecular breeding. Blackwell Publishing/CRC Press, Oxford/Boca Raton, pp 30–59Google Scholar
  7. Kearsey MJ, Farquhar AGL (1998) QTL analysis in plants; where are we now? Heredity 80:137–142PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Knapp S (1998) Marker-assisted selection as a strategy for increasing the probability of selecting superior genotypes. Crop Sci 38:1164–1174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Knight J (2003) Crop improvement: a dying breed. Nature 421:568–570PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Morgante M, Salamini F (2003) From plant genomics to breeding practice. Curr Opin Biotechnol 14:214–219PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Neeraja C, Maghirang-Rodriguez R, Pamplona A, Heuer S, Collard B, Septiningsih E et al (2007) A marker-assisted backcross approach for developing submergence-tolerant rice cultivars. Theor Appl Genet 115:767–776PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Peleman JD, van der Voort JR (2003) Breeding by design. Trends Plant Sci 8:330–334PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Podlich DW, Winkler CR, Cooper M (2004) Mapping as you go: an effective approach for marker-assisted selection of complex traits. Crop Sci 44:1560–1571CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ribaut JM, Hoisington D (1998) Marker-assisted selection: new tools and strategies. Trends Plant Sci 3:236–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Smith S, Beavis W (1996) Molecular marker assisted breeding in a company environment. In: Sobral BWS (ed) The impact of plant molecular genetics. Birkhauser, Boston, pp 259–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Thomas WTB (2003) Prospects for molecular breeding of barley. Ann Appl Biol 142:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Xu Y (2003) Developing marker-assisted selection strategies for breeding hybrid rice. Plant Breed Rev 23:73–174Google Scholar
  18. Xu Y, Crouch JH (2008) Marker-assisted selection in plant breeding: from publications to practice. Crop Sci 48:391–407CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Young N (1999) A cautiously optimistic vision for marker-assisted breeding. Mol Breed 5:505–510CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Yousef GG, Juvik JA (2001) Comparison of phenotypic and marker-assisted selection for quantitative traits in sweet corn. Crop Sci 41:645–655CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer India 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Plant Molecular Biology & BioinformaticsTamil Nadu Agricultural UniversityCoimbatoreIndia

Personalised recommendations